Inherent Vice

Another pleb filtered. Sad!

it was all a dream he imagined when he was high.

>>84638409
What don't you get about it?

Pretty understandable, I don't know if I would have if I hadn't read the book first. Imo it's a movie that really improves on repeat viewings.

>>84638409
there's nothing to get. it's incoherent and boring

>>84638409
>post-modern literature

not even once senpai

you gotta get wicked blazed hash dope smoke smack dat gold bowl white tiger yee haw smick smackadoo yep

>>84638409
it's so funny, seen it 3 times always have a good time even though it's not a great adaptation

>>84638560
Pynchon's novels aren't about clear cut, easy to follow narratives.

>>84638409
Literaly AMSR: the movie.

>>84638540
Nothing happens

>>84638512

>>84638536
Where was this suggested in the film?

It is a waste of time. It is supposed to be an incoherent mess.

>>84638830
when he is high.

File: pancake.png (3MB, 2002x1078px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2002x1078px

MOTTO PANUKEIKU

>>84638512
the most lazy thing you can say

Really love the movie, but dislike the changed ending. Well, maybe not dislike, but I wish it was kept the same, because I love the book ending.
It's a small change, but it changes the entire tone of the ending. In the movie Doc driving away with Shasta is nice, and happy. Unsure of the future, but happy. But the book has Doc driving through the fog by himself, not sure where he is or how to get home, hoping that when the fog clears "something else will be there instead" which suggests Doc's exhaustion with his culture and lifestyle, which has left him alone in the fog.

>>84638862
It's supposed to be incoherent, but not too incoherent.
If you couldn't follow it that's your fault.