ITT: Films normies will never understand

>>84613157
>Films RLMdrones will never understand

Nice anon, I see you've been following the /tv/ hivemind very closely and now hate RLM.

Every movie with 8/10 or more on IMDb is normie.

Can you stop posting this fucking idiot? I'm amazed that /tv/ has been circlejerking about these pseud capeshit drones for like 7 years

It's iconic because it's a genre rarity done at a time when there wasn't much comparable. It was also produced fairly solidly, and they were able to keep people talking about it over a span of decades via various means.

It's a good movie for it's time. I can understand how some might say great. But it just doesn't do it for me. On an unrelated note the theatrical release is my favourite version, I actually like the voice over though it's a little too dry for me.

>But, muh contradicts the movie
I'm sorry, but how do you expect me to listen to someone that needed the unicorn scene to actually understand the plot, to give insight into the themes of the movie?

Oh and I've been meaning to ask. I'm assuming there are a half dozen or so uber autists who make images like the OP image and obsessively troll/post RLM related things. Are they homegrown /tv/ autists, or is there home base somewhere else? I can't help but think there might be a lolcow or two among them.

>>84613271
I generally find most of the best films are a 6.1 - 6.8 on imdb

File: innocence 2004.jpg (208KB, 1400x572px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1400x572px

Anyone gonna actually contribute to the thread or just argue about blade runner?

>pic related
>to the thread

>>84613157
This is actually a very good answer desu.

Whether or not someone finds this movie 'boring' is the single greatest pleb filter there is