Just came back from this movie. It sucks. Only r9k posters can

>it sucks
>6/10
what kind of retarded fucking rating system is this

>>84601678
Its not as good as tv was making out to be.

>>84601718
i don't care about the film. you said it sucks, but you also said it's a 6/10. in what world is 6/10 a negative score? by rights, it's above average.

>>84601730
If you think a 6/10 is worth watching you are not a true kino connoisseur tbqh

>>84601817
the very definition of 6/10 is "watchable, but definitley not a masterpiece" you fucking faggot

>>84601817
holy fuck could you possibly be more fucking retarded

if you're rating movies on a weighted scale, a 6/10 would be above the mean (5.5) and thus an above average, if not good or great, film.

>>84601839
4u
>>84601845
found the r9k poster

>>84601862
>found the r9k poster
what the fuck about that post was r9k? you're literally beyond stupid.

>>84601845
to be fair yeah its watchable but its not as good as you people were making out to be. like i said.

>>84601884
>you people
i've already established that i don't give a fuck about Baby Driver. but seriously, you need to develop a less retarded system for rating films, if you're going to do it at all.

File: images.jpg (18KB, 507x290px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 507x290px

>>84601671
No us from /r9k/ don't have gf