What are some good Vice documentaries /tv/?

File: cumbasket.jpg (150KB, 367x493px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 367x493px

>alt right gets butthurt about fake news
>literally creates fake news like pic related

cool thread OP

File: 1498954135419.jpg (56KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1200x675px

>>84587165
>Islamaphobia

>>84587206
fox news owns vice
nice try

>>84587165
>we don't stand behind what we say

>Vice
>Good

>>84587165
>be jew jounalist
>working for vice, writing clickbait
>crafty goys bypass my scheme, denying me my g*d given shekels
>make a post attacking these evil goys by associating them with racists

That one about Liberia where the niggers try running a country

>>84587165
This can't be real
"without giving us a chance to update, remove or edit"

This is the whole idea! this can't be real. It fits perfectly the stereotype.

File: shes fine oh.jpg (41KB, 744x582px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 744x582px

>Right wing archiving sites

whaaaaaaaaaaat

you didn't see NOTHIN, GOY
also
>internet archive is "right wing"
nigga what

>>84587349
See for yourself, make an archive.is link to a new Vice article

>we disable archives so you can't catch our lies

File: 1232404888445.jpg (10KB, 247x248px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 247x248px

>>84587165
so they are butthurt that someone archives their articles????????

>>84587165

>go to check it on their FB page
>no such post exists
>https://web.archive.org/web/*/vice.com

why does the fault-right make up "news"?

>>84587165
From when is that. Post the link to that facebook post.

>>84587282
>site crawlers are literally hitler!
>curl is goebbels! wget is mengele!

>archive services
>right-wing

did i miss something or are they just mad people with right-wing agendas use those services? like..anyone can use it. if a public library lends a book to a nazi that doesn't mean the library is supporting nazis.

>>84587390

holy shit it won't let me archive

>>84587165
Nice fake news Ishmael.

>>84587506
Liberals are running a huge disassociation campaign where being seen with the other side is considered just as bad as being one.

>>84587506
Obsession with history is right wing in and of itself, look at Trump's obsession with the 1950s or the NRA types who jerk off around some kind of sacred infallible text passed by a bunch of scurvy ridden slave rapists in powdered wigs. People are supposed to look to the future, not the past.

>>84587623
The fact the some people (left and right wing) legitimately think thoughts like these depresses me.

I welcome the next extinction level event.

>>84587623
Lol this post is retarded

File: 1480560819339.gif (2MB, 695x392px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 695x392px

>>84587692
>I welcome the next extinction levelevent

This to be quite honest with you family.

File: Screenshot (89).png (75KB, 1899x915px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1899x915px

>>84587206
>>84587462

I have checked their facebook for posts within the past 24 hours and haven't come across anything. However, when I do try to make an archive of the first article on Vice, it gives me a 404 instead. I'll try again with a different article and post a screenshot of that as well. Anyone can do this and see for themselves.

>>84587165
Fine, i'll do it.

-the CZW tournament of death one.
-the one with old people and rednecks shooting at things in the desert.(my fav)

Aand the one covering compensated dating in tokyo.

>>84587838
>https://web.archive.org/web/20140306173720/http://www.vice.com:80/read/food-that-is-bigger-than-food

From Feb 2014

>>84587858
Thanks. It's nice to see some people still give a fuck about the topic of a thread.

Japanese suicide forest one
Abandoned Chinese cities

Google must be the most 1488 of all, with their caches and whatnot.

File: Meistarinn.jpg (29KB, 500x563px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x563px

>>84587165
Giants of Iceland

>>84587623
>Obsession with history is right wing in and of itself,

THIS.

File: 1491352076697.jpg (10KB, 236x237px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 236x237px

>>84587903
Confirmed for not knowing what the topic of the thread is.

File: Screenshot (90).png (62KB, 1919x991px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1919x991px

>>84587838

Here's a screenshot of me using waybackmachine to grab an instance of their site a few days ago. Another 404. Interesting.

>>84587901

Interesting...

File: 83bd0cde12473086f27a08eac618cbf1.jpg (39KB, 718x404px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 718x404px

>>84587623
>Obsession with history is right wing in and of itself

>>84588017
>>84587901
>>84587838
bravo vice

>>84588017

Here's the URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20170630125421/https://www.vice.com/en_us

Turns up 404

Here's one from 2014: http://web.archive.org/web/20140503005349/http://www.vice.com/en_us

Goes through

Perhaps they just disabled archiving of any recently made article?

>>84588134
>major global news organizations spouting falsehoods isn't as bad as some random fuck on youtube doing the same
hm

>>84588084

Perhaps I'm not using this site correctly, but every archive version doesn't return anything for another recently made article:
https://megalodon.jp/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vice.com%2Fen_us%2Farticle%2F3knnmb%2Ftrump-is-turning-americas-back-on-the-world

So, it does appear to be true, that they have disabled archiving, but only for recently made articles. Perhaps they deleted that facebook post as well, as it was being spread on /pol/. What better way to make them look like idiots than delete it? No one's going to trouble themselves to see if it's actually true by going to those sites, archiving a vice article, and seeing for themselves that it 404s. Calling right-wingers stupid is enough to satisfy their curiosity

>>84588084

You get 404s back in the early 2000's too. Aren't these snapshots hosted by Internet Archive and not Vice? Even if Vice deletes a story, the WBM would still have it stored. So a 404 is on WBM's end, right?

Plus Vice has subscriptions and they have their own archives. They could have started blocking third party archive services so people would have to buy subscriptions to access on-site archives. That would explain why you don't have snapshots past Jan 1 2017.

File: SHUT IT DOWN.png (29KB, 1580x264px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1580x264px

It's even happening in this very thread

>>84588197
>hm

As if a random youtuber has the platform, prestige, pedigree, repute, or influence of a major, corporate, media conglomerate broadcasted on millions of TVs and reported daily in the most widely read journalistic publications.

>>84588238
yes i know you are agreeing with me

>>84588213
>You get 404s back in the early 2000's too.

That could possibly be due to other factors.

> Aren't these snapshots hosted by Internet Archive and not Vice? Even if Vice deletes a story, the WBM would still have it stored. So a 404 is on WBM's end, right?

I'm not sure, exactly, but maybe Vice can make a request for those sites to block archival of their content?

>Plus Vice has subscriptions and they have their own archives. They could have started blocking third party archive services so people would have to buy subscriptions to access on-site archives. That would explain why you don't have snapshots past Jan 1 2017.

That is likely, though the articles I pulled didn't require a subscription.

>>84588199

Yeah but someone on /pol/ could have searched for a vice article on WBM to bitch about and discovered it was 404. Then being the conspiracy minded people they are, they figured it was some kind of cover up happening and then said "Wouldn't it be funny if they did it because leather daddy trump is spanking their fake news so hard!?" then someone made a fake FB post to troll cuck libtards on non-/pol/ boards.

At the very least that's as likely as Vice making a FB post, deleting it because the cunning detectives at /pol/ discovered the dastardly plot.

>>84588292
>That could possibly be due to other factors.

Well if it could be other factors then, it could be other factors now.

kek, imagine going from a skateboard/punk group to an international journalist group to a fucking clickbait group? SAD!

File: no comment.png (248KB, 964x662px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 964x662px

Is "LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" really a sustainable business model or are news agencies just going to shout it louder and louder as they go out of business?

>>84588310
>Yeah but someone on /pol/ could have searched for a vice article on WBM to bitch about and discovered it was 404. Then being the conspiracy minded people they are, they figured it was some kind of cover up happening and then said "Wouldn't it be funny if they did it because leather daddy trump is spanking their fake news so hard!?" then someone made a fake FB post to troll cuck libtards on non-/pol/ boards.

Alright, but those articles I pulled did in fact return 404'd, so there is some truth to this; the question is why, as that image cannot necessarily be trusted. At the same time, I'm growing bored of this as there's nothing really all that dastardly about Vice; they're just ass-kissing, kool-aid drinking, butt-plug-wearing cum farts.

>At the very least that's as likely as Vice making a FB post, deleting it because the cunning detectives at /pol/ discovered the dastardly plot.

Perhaps you're mocking me but considering the kind of people that work at places like Vice, Buzzfeed, Gawker, etc. I'm sure they'd relish any opportunity to make /pol/acks (who they seem to have the greatest hatred and contempt for) look like idiots.
\

If you use Vice's full current-day address

https://www.vice.com/en_us

instead of

vice.com

You can now access some snapshots from earlier this year. Jan 9 2017

https://web.archive.org/web/20170109081804/https://www.vice.com/en_us

So it's obviously some kind of URL/redirect fuckery. Perhaps a migration to a new domain or a new directory structure.

File: vice.png (636KB, 862x774px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 862x774px

>we'll never be able to keep articles like this for posterity

Wasn't xenophobia a joke word in early 2000s?

File: norm_macdonald.jpg (73KB, 375x281px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 375x281px

>>84588536
However, it's still rumored Hollywood is a Child Sex Ring.

File: occupy.jpg (629KB, 4302x2274px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 4302x2274px

>>84588536

Kind of blood boiling how common this variety of skepticism is on the millenial left.

>"There's no such thing as a conspiracy,"
>"The elites would never do something so wicked!" >"People in power, with immense wealth, IN A CAPITALISTIC SOCIETY, WITH CAPITALISTIC DIVISIONS AND CLASSES, WOULD NEVER FEEL ABOVE THE COMMON PEOPLE AND THEIR SOCIAL MORES/VALUES!"

Kind of a cognitive dissonance, right?

File: image-of-expanded-progressive-stack.png (12KB, 723x248px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 723x248px

>>84588720
Economic leftism is dead. Racial leftism buried it.

Now you can steal as much money as you want, bomb as many countries as you want, exploit as much labor as you want, enslave as many immigrants as you want, pollute as much as you want and as long as you're loudly condemning the Fucking White Males you're golden.

>>84588410
i don't understand why the entire western establishment seems so allergic to objectivity and discourse.

Funny that they've acted like cunts for years and then pretend to be the victims

File: 29608040-3e27-11e5-a580-5d86ec2e3b6f-1020x784.jpg (150KB, 1019x784px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1019x784px

>>84588764
It's almost as if these divisions were artificially sown by the robber barons in the first place!

>>84587165
>"This way, we can continue to poison the internet with a lot of fucking bullshit, then bait and switch again with impunity once the damage has been done"

They won't be able to keep this up. A.) Much of their previous trash has already been archived. b.) There will always be a workaround. Always. It is just a matter of time.

>>84587623
>Obsession with history is right wing in and of itself
That's true and that's good. Right wingers have a better sense of their cultural past, their place in the world, and their self as a result. It's why they're politically more resilient.

>>84588764
This is pretty accurate

Look at all the Liberals sucking up to the CEO of Goldman Sach's just because he attacked Trump

Disgusting

>>84588410
It's quite simple to kill this shit, honestly: just make the "mean girls" energy that these sites use, uncool. Remind everyone that the women and men of today who subscribe to it are not unlike the "kewl kid cliques" of yesterdecade, who are now the suburban burnouts and loser pariahs of today.


You can only be so catty and vile until everyone finally drops you like a bag of shit.

File: Know whom to criticize.jpg (222KB, 1239x1147px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1239x1147px

There are so many sites removing comments. I hate it because it doesn't allow for critical voices to be heard.

>>84588764

>>84587858
Tournament of Death has really gone downhill, I hope that's about older ones. Those were actually pretty decent shows.

File: 1486152082680.png (2MB, 3308x1888px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3308x1888px

>>84589122
>I hate it because it doesn't allow for critical voices to be heard.
That's the point, though

IMDB deleted their entire message board, literal tens of millions of posts over two decades, because they were getting frustrated with the number of Trump supporters complaining about movies.

>>84587165
The one where they go to North Korea was pretty good. Same with the one where they were shooting guns in the desert.

>>84589500
vice hasnt done cool shit like that since like 2013

>>84587165
What the fuck happened to Vice? I used to like some of their documentaries back in the day. ..

File: tc0naxgit67y.jpg (52KB, 960x954px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 960x954px

lmao why do leftists get so butthurt easily

fucking faggots lol

>>84589869
They're grown children

>>84587623
kek what the fuck? do people actually think like this?

>>84589178
It actually delves on how Hyde prepares the event than the tourney itself. It's still fascinating tho.

This one is the best.

https://youtu.be/uCppmoZiXUY