Confirmation Kubrick worked on the moon landing

I think we need to ask ourselves why it is that Kubrick attracts autists like this. Why do people feel the need to make conspiracy theories involving him, when they don't with Tarkovsky or Antonioni, for instance? Does it point to a limitation in his work that loser males living in box rooms gravitate to it?

Always a good watch any time starts with the moon landing hoax bunk

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

>>84471076
>>>/x/

>>84471415
>Tarkovsky
>Antonioni

Yeah, I wonder why a conspiracy theory invented and promoted by Americans isn't attributed to foreign film directors.

Retard.

explain how i can see the flag with a telescope then

>>84472186
its a hologram

>>84471076
>mfw there are people who take Alex Jones seriously

You literally can't make this up

>>84472186
do you know how to read

>>84472186
did you even read the OP? he says people went to the moon, but the footage was fukd so they made some in case the mission failed

I post this every moon landing thread and people still come in, ignore it and claim the moon landing was obviously faked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU

If it was faked, refute this video. Cause the reality is that it would have been impossible to fake with the available technology. But it would have been technically possible to actually go there.

>>84471512
thread's over. yea?

>>84471076
>the moon landing was live-streamed continuously
So, uh, when was this supposed footage used apparently?

>>84471415
It's the complete opposite. Kubrick actually made entertaining films so his audience is much wider.

If any of those names attract box dwellers it's not him.

>>84472291
>it isn't a conspiracy, b-b-but it could have been!
You kids are retarded.

>>84472366
It was the Lizzard People of Mars who pumped flouride into the water to make you think the moon landing happened of course! I won't spoonfeed you the details though, connect the dots!

File: IMG_2527.png (497KB, 900x450px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 900x450px

>>84471076
Nah it's fake bro it's all fake

>>84472366
Have he heard about the movie 2001 released in 1968? Because it has the special effects supposed to be impossible to do in 1969.

>>84472669
>Because it has the special effects supposed to be impossible to do in 1969.

Apparently they weren't.

>>84472257
I know, these people need some water filters.

>>84471076
>I've talked to the President

Imagine how much the intel agencies freak out when they see Jones on the White House phone logs.

Even if conspiracies aren't true there's still plenty of secret stuff Trump can accidentally let slip.

>>84472669
>Because it has the special effects supposed to be impossible to do in 1969.
No it doesn't. In fact, there are very detailed analyses of how the special effects in that film were done.
What would make the moon landing impossible to fake back then are not the special effects, but the technical limitations of recording on film stock. Watch the video and stop shitposting

>>84471076
>today, Alex said some bullshit for views.
Yes, and?

>>84472669
Are you for fucking real?

>>84472186
No you can't. Nice job attracting so many retards eager to defend the narrative though.

>>84472751
>Even if conspiracies aren't true there's still plenty of secret stuff Trump can accidentally let slip.
The absolute moron was giving his personal number to everyone in the G20, that basically is against of protocols of security.

>>84472751
>Let me tell you about the heroes of Roswell New Mexico, great guys I tell you.
>There was a whole campaign administered by the old regime and supported by that disastrous president, Kennedy, to have these heroes, these American heroes, to have their names tarnished. And why?
>Cause they were scared. They didn't want you, the American people, the hard-working average Joes, to be able to be involved in intergalactic trade.
>But I can't really talk about all that because it's classified. I mean, I can talk about it; because I'm the president. But we shouldn't talk about that

>>84472186

Flag will have been blown away by now.

>>84471415
Because he made 2001? Because he is famous for being overly obsessive with every little detail of his work? Because he was not outspoken to the public so much? That makes him the go-to name to yell when you're looking for someone to fake the moon landing.
I'm not a believer in this dumb ass theory I'm just saying

Gotta love the typical Jones pattern.

>guys, I've discovered this vast conspiracy!
>they're trying to keep the truth down, but we know better!
>Well, it's clear we don't have the whole story!
>ok, so maybe some of it happened like how they said, but there's definitely something being covered up!
>look, I'm not trying to say this never happened, just that we don't have all the facts!
>I want to talk to you about a new conspiracy against you folks!

Again and again and again. How do people eat this shit up, year after year?

>>84472751
>there's still plenty of secret stuff Trump can accidentally let slip

Accidentally? He's bragging about state secrets.

>>84471076

The mission was a success. This is all that matters. If it was not, the SOVIET UNION, who had their shit together when it came to intel and space, would have said something. They didn't. It happened.

>>84473096
>How do people eat this shit up, year after year?

Wishful thinking. Some people just can't cope with reality.

>>84471415
>I think we need to ask ourselves why it is that Kubrick attracts autists like this
Right? Hideaki Anno prolly faked the Moon Landing and everyone is confusing one autist for another autist.

>>84473504
Anno faked the Eva ending and has been playing cover up ever since.

>>84473096
Lol this. Remember how he pretended that he recorded the entire NBC debate when all he had was a phone call with Kelly? Remember how he posted hour long videos talking about how he "exposed" NBC and never released the full interview from his end? Then a day later, he ranted about the start of WW3.

Alex jones isnt even a "proper" conspiracy theorist anymore. Hes a money grubbing shill. When he had Trump on his show he just agreed with Trump on the official narrative of 9/11 and the dancing "muslims" narrative which is used to deflect from the dancing israelis. He just plays the conservative go to guy and shills all his shitty products. Bill Cooper was right about him all those years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7jJMYJbAKc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCeUoKMSl3o

>>84472922
Kek

>>84472186
They flew up there and stuck it in the ground to make sure no one would catch on

>>84475366
Israelis didn't dance either, bud.

File: 1497033543515.jpg (118KB, 1200x684px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1200x684px

>moon landing
Yeah you probably believed that ships can "orbit" the earth too. Take the red pill people, stop believing (((their))) round earth lies.

>>84477135
nice try
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XHm56O2NTI

File: 1497719564060.jpg (37KB, 692x633px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 692x633px

If you belive that he faked the moon landing (something which was confirmed by even the US's biggest enemy the Soviet Union) or the "hurrr Kubrick was killed for making EWS" you need to kill yourself.

>>84477174
>some autist made a video on YouTube
Yeah, this isn't evidence matey. That didn't happen. Don't be crazier than Jones please...

YouTube videos made by retards isn't evidence.

>>84477284
>the Soviet Union said it
Well shit comrade, why didn't you say so? Wtf, I hate moon landings now!

>>84477165
Why doesn't the sun leave scorch marks or heat signatures as it passes the disc if it is only a few thousand miles away?

>>84477174
>here is my Youtube video
Every time.

File: images (12).jpg (8KB, 306x165px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 306x165px

CHECK

>>84477349
Haven't you ever seen your lawn get burnt in the summer? That wouldn't happen if the sun was way far out in space. It's so obvious when you think about it.

>>84477297
>Oy vey we can pretend it never happened by repeating it enough times and memeing it into other people

>>84477414
Or you know, you could produce credible evidence that isn't just the crazy ramblings of some retard on a Youtube video?

>>84477396
>Haven't you ever seen your lawn get burnt in the summer
No?

>>84477471
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1

okay so why did kubric admit to doing it in the shining?

are we supposed to believe he was just lying?

>>84471076
>>We've got the contacts, it's all well known, I've talked to the President, I don't need to go any further."
>a known bullshitter
>citing sources from another known bullshitter

SHIT MAN IT'S GOTTA BE THE TRUTH

regardless I'm watching the Shining tonight

>>84477604
Did you even fucking read this? There was no "mob of Israelis dancing and cheering", they were 5 kids in their early 20s who were Israeli citizens who were acting suspicious. There is also no video evidence outside of a single testimony that they were cheering in the first place.

You people take one story and extrapolate the most autistic shit from it. You're a useful idiot reactionary. Read your own links, shitbrains.

>>84477917
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVXrvOMPS2o

Alex says he thinks they actually went to the moon but had backup/alternate footage for PR done by the SFX people Kubrick used according to Kubrick's daughter.

.t listened to the show today

>>84477972
Jesus you are dense, what's the timecode that shows the actual footage of Israelis dancing because the towers are falling??? Where is it? I'm not watching 28 minutes of this shit.

So either you are baiting me or you know there is no actual footage and you can't come to terms with that.

>TRUST ME GOYS! WE WENT TO THE MOON!!!!

There are people who strongly belive men hasn't set foot on the moon

File: 1498834034785.png (86KB, 337x441px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 337x441px

>>84477972
>Fox news story gets pulled for mostly being bullshit and fear mongering lies off the heels of a national tragedy
>anon digs this clip up after a decade of it being irrelevant and factually wrong in most instances
>still can't show me footage of "dancing Israelis"
Gee, it's almost as if you fell for bullshit.

>>84478084
They took the red pill anon

>>84478131
I feel bad for anyone who needs to communicate through Matrix lingo.

>>84472537
>I'm goint to mention lizard people so nobody takes you seriously

>>84478749
Nobody was taking you seriously anyway, since the moon landings aren't fake.

>>84471076
Philippe Lheureux's theory presented in his book Lumieres sur la Lune is that, in order not to give out the real photos containing scientific information about the Moon which could be used by rival countries, photos and video taken during the training stages was substituted. That satisfied the American taxpayer and that left no real possibility for the other countries to make scientific use of them.

>>84479500
So what? You can theorize anything to be true. There is no proof to any of those claims.

>>84479581
Have you read Lumieres sur la Lune by Philippe Lheureux? The bibliography is 20 pages long. I'm not sure why you decided to post this absurd claim of no proof when it's clear you haven't read the book, which literally contains 20 pages of lists of sources.

>>84473096
Because Jones is a showman. He's entertaining as fuck.

>>84479747
>if he lists sources, then it must be true
Any nutbag that pretend they have sources champ. Doesn't make their sources credible. Alex Jones is a source, doesn't make him credible in the slightest.

The moon landing wasn't faked and neither were any of the pictures. If you most you can produce is one autist "theorizing" something, then I'm pretty confident in what I know to be true.

>>84479911
*can pretend

>>84471076
So the new story is "We really went to the Moon but we also faked it"?

>>84479747
>HE'S GOT A LOT OF SOURCES! TRUST ME!

>>84480054
It's a published work, not a secret. You are free to review it and come to your own conclusions.

>>84479911
>Any nutbag that pretend they have sources champ.
The whole point of citing sources is to give the person you're talking to the chance to review what you're basing your argument on and from there they can form their opinions on the information provided. That's what discussion is supposed to be, you retard.

>>84480164
Then post the sources, faggot. This isn't really something that deserves a discussion in the first place but everyone here is just humoring you and how autistic it is to debate this. It's like talking to flat earthers. You are arguing that the government faked moon landing videos... And now you are doing that "secret knowledge" shtick and prob won't post any info because then you know how hard your "sources" are going to get btfo. Of course, that just serves to strengthen your persecution complex and you'll same some bullshit like "I'm afraid of the teuth" or some such other faggoty thing.

>>84480117
There are "published" works on the Holocaust being a ruse game devised by Jews. You can publish anything you gullible fuck.

>>84480357
*say
*truth

>>84480117
Why don't you take your shit to /x/? That's more your IQ level and I'm sure you will convince literal autists there.

>>84472186
ROFL
>>84472845
This guy is correct. You'd need a telescope lens the size of UofM stadium to see the flag.

>>84480476
Philippe Lheureux's theory presented in his book Lumieres sur la Lune is similar in nature to OP's suggestion. Thought it was worth a mention. Didn't realise it would engender false hostility with the purpose of provoking others.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-01-00-10-11.png (947KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

947KB, 1440x2560px

>>84480492
>Update from Ann: It's still the case that the relatively small telescopes we have on Earth, and orbiting Earth, can't see these tiny features on the Moon. But in 2009 NASA launched the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) probe to orbit the Moon, study the landscape in detail, and characterize the environment (mostly focused on checking for radiation, with which future astronauts would have to contend).

>In addition to carrying out this scientific mission, LRO was able to take images of the Apollo landing sites (for the Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 missions) and could identify the flags and other equipment. Read more about that here or here, and check out NASA's multimedia image archive from LRO including this stunning image of the Apollo 11 site.

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/45-our-solar-system/the-moon/the-moon-landings/122-are-there-telescopes-that-can-see-the-flag-and-lunar-rover-on-the-moon-beginner

https://www.space.com/16798-american-flags-moon-apollo-photos.html

>>84480554
Anon, do you go out of your way to study Holocaust denial and give denier "theorists" a critical ear despite lack of any hard evidence?

>>84471076

They dropped this truth bomb in fargo s3 too.

>>84480554
>false hostility
What does this even mean? Buddy, we are asking you to prove your claims or the claims of whoever you keep memeing about. Post evidence or shut the fuck up.

File: cd4c57c32c86bb2613a26bac559907a9.jpg (104KB, 736x919px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 736x919px

>>84471076
Reminder that black people were on the fucking moon, but evil whiteys made their own version of moon landing with pathetic white people and now everyone thinks it was the WHITE MAN who conquered the moon. but it's FALSE. IT WAS THE BLACK MAN WHO CONQUERED THE MOON.

>>84480722
Technically a monkey did go into space before Yuri Gagarin

>>84480787
also all the other cosmonauts that went into space and died and were covered up

BUZZ ALDRIN'S INSTAGRAM

>>84471076
The moon-landing it's pure ideology.

>>84480859
Why does Buzz go antifa when presented with information or questions he doesn't like?

>>84480930
Because that nigga went to the fucking moon and he probably gets basement dwellers like yourself bugging him constantly about conspiracy theories, so I don't blame him if he punches a few NEETS here and there who think they are rocket scientists after watching an Alex Jones video.

>>84480930
There's this phenomena that happens to some astronauts once they leave the atmosphere were seeing how small the earth is totally fucks their life perspective. Buzz has been walking around with that for decades.

>>84480930
>only antifafags are violent

>>84471512

What a crock of shite. Most of those arguments regarding dust and what not can be applied to the eventuality that the moon landing wasn't a fake.

>>84481210
Some disagree.

>>84483094
People are basically stupid. They believe a lot of stupid shit. We're barely past chimpanzees. It took us 5000 years to invent the wheel. Yes we're the most intelligent life form on this planet, but compared to what? Dolphins? Face it humanity isn't capable of handling the complexities of the world.

>>84471076
It's true that Kubrick filmed it. However, Kubrick was an infamously meticulous perfectionist, and so he demanded that it be shot on location.

True. This is why moon landing hoaxes were easily executed in primitive decades of the 20th century. Harder to pull off these days, but it's still possible to fool this planet full of stupid people, see 9/11

>>84483215
The 9-11 planes were holograms, everyone knows that. Also no Jews died on 9-11. They were all alerted of the attack through (((their))) network. It's so obvious come on

>>84483146
>It took us 5000 years to invent the wheel.

What a fucking stupid metric to go with. The invention of the wheel happened after we'd domesticated enough draught animals to make them worthwhile. It didn't take us thousands of years to invent it, it took us thousands of years to domesticate wild animals and have the practice spread.

>>84483146
I forgot to give your (You). Accident bro, please don't hold it agin me.

>>84483215
You really have to be quite the retard to think the moon landings were faked. I honestly hope you are laughed out of every public forum when you eventually bring it up.

>>84483215
9-11 wasn't a conspiracy either, pal.

>>84483419
9/11 literally was a criminal conspiracy, that's the whole premise behind the war on terror. It's a mythologized RICO case.

>>84483499
Yeah, yeah whatever faggot. We've heard the same truther arguments for over a decade. Bush fucked up and lied about WMDs based on shit info, that's it. The towers were not a false flag, we just sucked at intel and didn't act on the tips like we should have. But I'm sure this answer won't satisfy you. I'm sure explaining to you how a controlled demolition would have been impossible to hide on that scale won't satisfy you...nothing will.

>>84483499
I'm sure any day now you will prove it and crack the case...almost 20 years later.

>>84483623
>we just sucked at intel and didn't act on the tips like we should have.
An interesting followup to that is that up until the famous "Axis of Evil" speech, Iran was actually working in tandem with the IC to hunt bin Laden and provided the only usable intelligence on bin Laden. They were totally blindsided when GW declared them to be terrorists and then it magically took another eight years of occupation to "find" bin Laden in a military complex protected by our allies Pakistan. I totally get why people are skeptical of 9/11.

>>84483743
None of that logically follows that you should then jump to thinking that the government staged some elaborate false flag to blow up our own buildings just to go into the Middle East, despite us already having a presence there. I've heard the cookiest shit on here over the years.

>>84483909
Within a few hours of the first plane hitting, Rumsfeld sent cables to every agency asking for any and every connection to Iraq. They planned the narrative, maybe after the fact, but it was crafted intentionally by the government. While they may not have planned the Saudi funded and executed terror attacks, they certain found a way to justify a hundred year occupation of the Middle East all in the name of MUH TERROR

>>84483981
I'm sure they planned a narrative of who they wanted to blame...that doesn't make 9/11 a conspiracy. That doesn't mean they orchestrated the towers falling. It's believable that they freaked the fuck out and then blamed Iraq.

>>84484046
That was my over all point >>84483743. The CIA enlisted retired generals and government contractors to go on tv and espouse their "unbiased opinions" about how the invasion of Iraq wasn't just a good idea it was a necessity to safe guarding the American way of life. That sort of new world order bullshit calls the whole scenario into question, which again, I don't blame the skepticism for. Is it a coincidence that one of the largest military exercises in North America was being conducted on the morning of 9/11? Sure. Was it also a coincidence that that specific scenario involved hijacked planes and terrorists? A long shot, but sure. Also a coincidence. The person on the ground, the one in charge of the FAA, it was his first shift and he had to make the call to ground all air travel in the CONUS. That's a coincidence too. It's just when you look at all this macro, when you see everything that came after as a direct result of 9/11, you can see how the bias begins to form.

>>84471076
YA WANNA QUICK RUNDOWN ON THAT WHOLE ENCHILADA

>>84471076
>alex flip flopping like this

this cannot be happening

>>84480787
>Yuri Gagarin
who?

>>84484176
>Is it a coincidence that one of the largest military exercises in North America was being conducted on the morning of 9/11? Sure
Pretty sure that didn't happen and it was a made up meme by conspiracy tards. You also forget that there were just general tips about a vague attack, somewhere. So even if that did happen, it would have been in response to that.

You should check some of these facts, mate.

>>84484176
It seems a bit much to call it "new world order bullshit". You aren't one of those faggots that think there is a literal illuminati or something...right?

>>84484348
http://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Article/578022/norad-maintains-northern-vigilance/

>>84484408
This coupled with the CIA tips doesn't make this mobilization seem too crazy though.

>>84484378
I called it bullshit because it's exactly the kind of thing that NWO/Illuminati faggots would point to as collusion if they ever bothered to google anything ever.
>>84484433
Again. It's about the coincidence. it's not hard to understand the misgivings. That being said, most 9/11 falseflaggers are focused on that one plane that "landed" that was also one of the hijacked planes due to a computer error as opposed to the other published elements that could arouse suspicion.

>>84484176
You are going to need more than circumstantial bread crumbs and coinicdences to build a real foundation to justify a conspiracy though.

>>84471076
>Today Alex stated that he knows the moon landing was real
Stopped right there. Wanna try again?

>>84484481
It's like I was saying. There are actual, credible pieces of news you can point to as questionable as to the Fed's handling of 9/11 and the subsequent GWOT that don't involve basically the entirety of Loose Change which most 9/11 false flaggers hold up as their bible. Build the theory around that.

>>84484551
>Build the theory around that.
But that isn't how research works. You don't start with what you think is true and work backwards from lack of evidence. The evidence has just never been really there to justify believing it was a false flag. It's been almost 20 years, I don't think they will ever let up though. These people aren't usually rational.