Homecoming reviews come out tomorrow guess the score here!

>>84394345
%91 on RT
70 on Metacritic

100

On Rotten Tomatoes? Probably around a 75% AT BEST

88%
People will consistently say it beats out the Raimi ones

File: Never Ending BTFOing.jpg (744KB, 4096x1828px) Image search: [Google]

744KB, 4096x1828px

>>84394345
98% at least

>>84394345
94% "Best Spidey yet!" and "Best Spidey since 2!"
Negatives will focus on
A) RDJ
B) Not being Miles
C) "WW was the perfect super hero movie and then the patriarchy showed back up."

50%

File: 4726354-demarcus.png (19KB, 503x184px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 503x184px

45%

File: 1459626865467.png (360KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 500x500px

95% RT, 97% Audience score
73 Metacritic
8.3 on IMDb
Like >>84394503 said, negative will be RDJ (The word 'unnecessary' will be used in pretty much every review). Keaton will be praised, but said that he's a bit wasted. Shocker and whatever other villains are there are filler.
Fat asian kid will get praise too.

Cap this

My last 2 d___s

File: IMG_1336.jpg (16KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x168px

>>84394488
>someone gave it 91/100
>people who quantify things as percentages with no mathematical basis

>>84394488

They had shit like this for BvS and Suicide Squad

90% no way it's higher

>>84394745
And Wonder Woman. Did yoy forget that too?

File: 1498329616956.png (486KB, 1080x1483px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1080x1483px

>>84394745
not actual critics tho

>The star is a white male?!? Drop that RT score by 50%!!

>>84394345
93% and it won't need sjw critics to get there.

>>84394360
Also Jay and Mike will love it because of Keaton but Jay will think it had too much Iron Man in it. They'll make some snarky comments about Sony's/Marvel's business arrangement.

>>84394345

89%

File: Andrew_Garfield.jpg (28KB, 290x402px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 290x402px

>yfw The Amazing Spiderman is a retroactive masterpiece and Andrew Garfield is a legitimate actor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpC0z2P1uaY

>>84394345
43%, screencap this

>>84394345
2%
Marvel BTFO forever.
WW won't sell a single ticket more this week and will never surpass Snyder's apex kino.
Josh Whedon will commit suicide and be replaced by Zaddy again, and he'll deliver the 4 .5 hour capekino we all deserve.

>>84394488
>Great plot points
Look who's fresh out of film school and knows so much about film.

File: spiderman-screen-01-ps4-eu-14jun16.jpg (332KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1920x1080px

I'm more hyped for the PS4 Spider-Man game than Homecoming. But i'll see it, whenever it's good or not.

7.5 - it's very shit but disney literally sustains us

still wont beat DCkino Wonder Woman

>>84396277

>qte: the videogame

84%

If we lived in a world where information on every movie studio's business wasn't aired out daily, people would be less cynical and the film would probably be 97%

>>84394345
88%-96%
WHO'S READY FOR SOME SPIDER-KINO?

>>84394345

Will start off as 100%, will end up at 93%

I'm actually edited for this
Fight me fags

>>84394488
>Spider-Man meets CANT HARDLY WAIT.

If they're referring the song I'm all in for this kino

>>84396544
Crop yourself out of this thread then.

It sucks that just another Brit who can't do a proper American accent is playing Spider-Man.Fuck the Hollywood diversity shit with Brits taking American roles.

>>84396595
No :^)

>>84394345
115%

100%, DCucks have been warned

>>84396737
i'm edited for it too tho ;)

>>84394345
82%

75 +/- 5

File: IMG_0726.jpg (153KB, 640x674px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 640x674px

>tokens

>RDJ = $1 billion guaranteed
>Spider-man = most known superhero in the history of superheroes
It will be pretty fucking weird if this doesn't get to $1 billion at the very least, it's a movie tailored to make bank.

That said, it's pretty shitty compared to even the first TASM. Saw it yesterday at a screening in AMC Southdale 16 and was pretty overwhelmed.

>>84397074
Those fucks are all obnoxious. You're gonna hate Zendaya with the fire of a thousand suns.

>>84397074
That last part is true though.

>>84397133
How would does it compare to other MCU films?

>>84397074
false, tom is the token there.

Guaranteed 92% minimum, Marvel is too safe and Spiderman is too popular to fail, especially with the multicultural angle they're pushing
If the movie's a real stinker, the audience rating might be in the 80s or so, but it'll probably be passable and get mid 90s

>>84397133
I meant underwhelmed but overwhelmed at its mediocrity applies I guess.

>>84397165
At least the rest of the MCU movies don't make you feel like you're watching an episode of some Disney tv show.
The acting and CGI are atrocious, especially the latter. No one dies or gets visibly hurt, fuck even Vulture is fine and is in the mid credits scene not wanting to disclose Spider-man's identity.

>>84394954
He's saying it's inconsistent and you can't rely on it, you're saying you're retarded and don't understand how arguments work

Iron Man has more screentime than Spiderman.

>>84396685
The accent is inconsistent throughout the movie. Without RDJ, Tomei and Keaton it would've been unwatchable. It's more or less a long IM/Avengers commercial.

78% by midnight tomorrow
screencap this

>>84397562
He does in a sense. There are very few scenes where Tony isn't mentioned or the Avengers aren't referenced in some way.

How many Zendaya waifu threads can we expect?

>>84397797
She's a very insufferable character hopefully they will retcon her being MJ

>>84397285
>>84397928

Are you the same doofus that said in the other thread they call her MJ without explaining where the J comes from?

>>84397074
That last panel isn't wrong desu. New York City is diverse as fug. Ironically there probably wouldn't be that many whites though in Queens.

>>84398053
No.

>>84397573
Marvel should've brought back Maguire.He could've been as a retired superhero and then become Spider-Man again in Civil War.

>>84394345
82% with some description like, even though the main villain is underdeveloped this entry in the spiderman universe is a breath of fresh air for comic book movies

>>84398349
That would have been cool but i'm open to Holland as Spidey

>>84398384
I refuse to believe Keaton isn't going to steal the screen

>>84394345
92%
>A diverse cast and a strong performance by Tom Holland shows that the third times the charm for this friendly neighborhood summer blockbuster

Company warriors are gonna reeeeee whatever the score

>>84398458
That sounds pretty accurate. Too bad that the "diverse cast" cannot act for shit.

>>84398428
Visually he's pretty cool considering what he had to work with. He's wasted. The green screen is visible whenever it's used (often) and the CGI is pretty poor. Iron Man makes the movie, unironically.

>>84394345
somewhere between 70% - 80%

>>84398142
Yes but the interviewer didn't ask her "is queens for real filled with nignogs". She was asking about the cast chemistry and she just launched into this weird diversity speech.

Almost like she had it saved up or didn't have anything else to say.

File: peterp.jpg (40KB, 202x539px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 202x539px

>>84397797
Tomfu threads are where it's at

How is it possible that Marvel's CGI is getting worse with each movie?

>>84398635
Why must you lie?

https://youtu.be/FaM3HmV8voE
1:30

Seriously, what the heck do people have against this movie, there's so much random vitriol here

File: 9zFjdUL.jpg (87KB, 600x750px)

87KB, 600x750px

>>84398698
<3

>>84398829
Welcome to /tv/

hmm from what i've read from early viewings (bullshit or not) and considering Soney poison influence (regardless of most creative control to Marvel) i'm going for somehwere around the 55-70 mark on this one.

Most critics will enjoy it and consider it a decent summer blockbuster, the Marvel Formula pretty much always makes sure the movie will at least be 'ok' due to the lack of chances and creativity they are willing to take, i suspect some critics may be a bit harder on it because it will bet yet another superhero movie that offers nothing new.

Really hoped that this would have at least some 'freshness' to it like Guardians of the Galaxy had (hater it or not), really wanted a hell uf a ride experience, but this feels just like an average Ironman2/avengers/captainamerika/ageofultron.

>>84394488
>fun
>great
>fun
>hilarious
>fun

Negative infinity

>>84396277
How come movies can spend hundreds of millions on a movie but not $100M on a video game?

>>84398773
The money for this went to RDJ.

File: spiderdick.png (706KB, 1110x895px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 1110x895px

HOLY SHIT THE REVIEWS ARE OUT

>>84399346
All videogames are trash, everyone on /tv/ knows this, meaning you must be a redditer faggot

>>84395796
Pretty close to right

File: comment_GygbTV8vaTeisZ7Q8ZuopnM9spZLKjmu.gif (53KB, 129x111px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 129x111px

>>84401264
ITT: MARVEL KEKS BACKED THE FUCK OUT

B T F O
T
F
O

C U C K S
U
C
K
S

File: ben affleck smug.jpg (38KB, 500x425px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x425px

>>84401264

96% RT

DCfags are gonna be in tears

>>84401507
>Disney
>RDJ
>diversity
Checks out.

>>84397074
>Literally Gloria Grant, Ganke and Michelle
But they had to be racists and steal the characters from white people (Liz, Ned and MJ)

File: 1473433322140.png (66KB, 554x400px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 554x400px

>>84401264
DC ROCKERS IN THE HOUSE TONIGHT

>>84401642
They should've gone all out and use Miles Morales.

File: based disney.png (400KB, 640x358px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 640x358px

Did anyone else think this scene was a bit over the top?

>>84401733
And call him Peter Parker? because that's what they did with Liz, Flash, Ned and MJ they went full Gloria, Randy, Ned and Michelle but renamed them like white characters for extra racism

I don't get why racebending is seen as progressive but using actual characters of color from the comics isn't. I guess stealing is progressive but remembering your roots isn't.

>>84396326
Keep crying Pcuck, Switchshit, or Xnigger.

35% on RT


you can screencap this

>>84402017
Impossible, too progressive and diverse.

>>84394345
It's a Marvel movie, so it has to get glowing reviews in general.

Final RT score: 89% fresh

File: 1498097858085.png (424KB, 482x479px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 482x479px

>>84395725
I hate when people say shit like this. Those two Garfield Spiderman movies were horrible then and they're horrible now. Just because an even worse reboot (i assume) just came out doesn't change that fact. I don't know how that even makes sense to you, you fucking idiot.

>>84394345
>RT 90%
>Marvel's choice of a gay leading actor, and a diverse background cast make this the best Spider-Man film ever.

>>84401865
>>84402040
>>84402201
>>84399289
>>84398458
You just KNOW that diversity and fun will be mentioned. I'd bet my ass.

>>84402201
If only they made spidertwink gay in the film

won't reach raimi's

>>84402275
Zendaya looks like a ladyboy in the movie so it's not a stretch. So progressive.

>>84402414
Well Holland makes a pretty convincing drag-queen so match made in heaven. Harrison be damned.

>Sony Entertainment Pictures is reportedly keeping all of the profits from the box office sales of Spider-Man: Homecoming. The film, which is a collaboration with Marvel Studios, stars Tom Holland as the third and youngest incantation of the web-slinging superhero on the big screen. The film centers on his struggle to settle back in his old life in Queens following his first interaction with some of the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s in Captain America: Civil War.

>The information comes to light courtesy of a recent article published LA Times. The report details that Sony, who funded Homecoming, will pocket its profits. Disney (who owns all of Marvel), on the other hand, will rake in the sales from all the toys and other merchandise tied in with the character. That is on top of Marvel Studios being able to creatively use arguably Marvel’s most popular character in a number of their films.

>97%
>Fun
>Progressive
>Diverse
>A GOOD TIME
It doesn't take a genius to guess this one.

83% on rotten tomatoes and the critical consensus will include the phrase "back to its roots"

It will get 80%+ with an average of 6.5/10 - 7.5/10, while it deserves a 6/10.
The reason for that is >>84402230

>>84403303
"Finally back to its fun roots, the new Spider-man is a breathe of fresh air with its diverse and talented cast who manages to bring new life and a modern, funnier tone in the franchise that was lacking in the previous installments."

>>84403785
I'm already cringing

>>84403785
Holy shit that's perfect.

>>84396326
Honestly, that garbage barely qualifies as a game

Last two digits of my post is RT score

>http://screenrant.com/tag/spider-man-homecoming/
>12 articles in less than 24 hours
Holy shit.

>>84404099
no pls
reroll

File: 4555112[1].gif (682KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

682KB, 500x281px

>>84404099
>99%
holy fuck

>>84404123
The premier is in like an hour, so that isn't that weird.

>>84395725
Spider-Man 3 is a retroactive masterpiece, The Amazing Spider-Man movies are dumpster fires that will always be hated.

>>84394345
They'll be as glorious as Tom's cute rump!

File: 147906055840.jpg (106KB, 400x325px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 400x325px

>>84403785
>>84404099

40%

>>84404099
Sounds legit.
DIVERSE, FUN and BACK TO ITS ROOTS!

>>84404099
Marvelkino is back on the menu boys!

>>84403828
>>84403994
>"Finally back to its fun roots, the new Spider-man is a breathe of fresh air with its diverse and talented cast who manages to bring new life and a modern, funnier tone in the franchise that was lacking in the previous installments."
Can I bet on this to be the consensus with 99% score?

File: EmO4GCL.gif (4MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 320x180px

>>84404099
MAKE MINE MARVEL

>>84404099
last two digits will be the average score

My last 2 digits reversed is the score

File: 1476710681385.jpg (29KB, 357x312px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 357x312px

>>84404366
>>84404099

>>84404099

DC BTFO

>>84394345
100% for at least 24 hours, then it will fall to 94% and Marvelshills will complain about every negative review.

>>84404941
It literally cannot get negative reviews.

Will you fags ever accept that this movie is critics proof?

>>84404941
They will probably bitch about /pol/ because "muh black grilfriend"

>>84397074
What is going through Tom's head here?

>>84405874
He realised he'd signed on for the wrong movie?

File: farron.jpg (9KB, 225x235px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x235px

>>84394360
RT is a pile of shit.
A truly cancerous site.
In fact, all review aggregate sites are.
Find a few reviewers that you like and stick to them.

>>84394345
75%

>>84394488
>literal shills

65 to 75%. It looks mediocre as fuck, and if Disney/Marvel weren't involved would get a smack 50 to 55%. And I speak as someone who generally likes the MCU films, bar TDW, and IM3.

Low. Doesn't look very good

>>84404366
Well, it's possible, technically.

>>84394488
Wait a minute, this is the exact same thing as Force Awakens.

>>84395725
>Andrew Garfield is a legitimate actor
did you not see hacksaw ridge?

>>84398053
>Are you the same doofus that said in the other thread they call her MJ without explaining where the J comes from?

Not that guy but that is what happens. Her name is Michelle, she uses MJ herself at the end. Never says what her middle name is.

File: 1481314569171.png (827KB, 1015x506px) Image search: [Google]

827KB, 1015x506px

>>84398698
>>84398882
;)

>>84398635
>>84398829
BTFO

are there full spoilers yet?

>>84406482
>IM3
am I the only one who thinks this was the best Iron Man. China pandering aside, I thought it was the most entertaining out of all of them

>>84407683

More like HACKsaw Ridge, am I right?

>>84409910
>am I the only one who thinks this was the best Iron Man

Literally yes.

>>84409910
You are not alone.

File: gay retard.mp4 bitch.jpg (17KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x480px

my name is bitch fucker 69 and I like ponies

>>84409871
there is like 40 minutes of promo clips, you could probably piece together the entire movie from them

>>84404099

delet this

https://www.instagram.com/p/BV6GSxFA9z4/

This guy claims its the BvS of the MCU and is going to be really loved or hated

>>84401264
RIP IN PEACE MARVEL
BTFO
JUST BURY IT

>>84409910
>arch villain was just a prank bro! Your enemy is actually Syndrome!
Shit

>>84410581
Thats a huge insult to BvS who is pure visual kino fuck that shit

>>84396586
Talking about the 90s movie

>>84405274
It's cultural appropriation, shitlord.

>>84397074
Tom is thinking "what the fuck am I doing here with these losers? Where is RJD?"

"best Ironman movie ever made" kino/10 -/tv/

Can y'all check out my YouTube channel please? It's "X Sleeker X"

>>84394345
75

>>84398698
Are the Tom threads going to be similar to the Mark Hamill threads?

It's Marvel, I predict an 85%, certified fresh. Not as good as Wonder Woman or the first Rami spiderman but is good enough to make us forget about the amazing spiderman

milf/10

78%

File: 23523626.jpg (94KB, 843x514px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 843x514px

>>84410581

File: 62w46234.png (618KB, 690x633px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 690x633px

>>84410581
>Marketing should just be 1000 faces of Tony Stark

>>84412376
>It's Marvel
And sony and not just any sony
amy pascal sony

Pretty good. Everyone liked in the theaters.

"What the fuck?!?" Just remember that

File: 1484079540470.jpg (102KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 640x480px

You guys think well see a new Mary Jane at the end?

74

File: 1490801350083.jpg (61KB, 620x451px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 620x451px

Wait, hold the fuck up. Didn't they JUST reboot this shit with Emma Stone and what's his face like 3 years ago?

>>84412878
Yes and no

>>84412878

You get to see MJ at the end of Homecoming...

>>84412919
Five years ago, but yes.

>>84394345
Critics are eating it up. 92-95% tomorrow, will probaby go down to 85% by the end.