Blade Runner 2049

>>84388975
Both. Villeneuve has a good track record, but Scott is going senile and in ultra-hack mode.
It could go both ways, masterpiece or piece of shit. At least it won't be mediocre.

>>84388975
you should be both for sure

>>84389089
i'll agree with this except that prisoners was complete trash - so he can make a bad film

essited

You should be throwing it in the trash because American film and vidya is cancer.

If its kino, remove from trash, and pretend America is capable of kino in 2017.

>>84388975
You should be uninterested
cause its another sequel cashgrab

>>84388975
If they just gave Scott a title and he keeps his retardation away - Movie is fine
If he's involved in any real capacity - Shit sucks

File: 20170626194134~2.jpg (1MB, 3232x2424px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3232x2424px

Pure cashgrab despite Villeneuve. The trailer is a dead give away

>>84390929
A cash grab sequel to a film that failed at release? The second trailer did focus on action though to be fair

File: thirst.jpg (149KB, 918x1224px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 918x1224px

>>84391028
You don't think a movie with flashy effects appealing to nostalgia manchildren with big, current, names attached to it is a cash grab? This will be an action movie with some stupid pseudo philosophy smeard in your face.

>>84390929
the trailer was absolute kino
it gets you hooked but doesnt reveal anything about the plot (unlike 99% of the trailers nowadays)

File: 20170627200756.jpg (1MB, 2424x2424px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2424x2424px

>>84391251
>it gets you hooked
subjective
>doesnt reveal anything about the plot
Fair enough, it's not a recap trailer. But we know there's a girl, the joker is super-tyrell, the driver has only one emotion and harrison is old af

File: jif9a5qdecoy.jpg (47KB, 656x656px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 656x656px

Blade Runner is one of my favorite movies and I am absolutely not looking forward to this. Neon lights with synthwave music and Ryan Gosling looking autistic isn't enough to convince me
Also it looks too clean and fake
Take a look at this shit and weep
https://imgur.com/a/mv8qf

>>84391028
>that failed at release?
What does it matter, it became a cult classic, thus a perfect cashgrab for the modern era of popculture craze retardation

>>84391418
Are you me?
I first saw the movie in 94, when I was 12. I fell in love.
https://youtu.be/90MKJsa9BIQ