Was this show a little too violent for children? Why are 80's

Whats shonen mean

>>84380051
fuck off weeaboo
>>>/a/

File: 1392624033727.jpg (107KB, 960x636px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 960x636px

>>84380051
because children back then could handle it. shame about the new generations

>>84380104
basically the japanese equivalent of super heroes

shonen manga =/= DC/marvel

>>84380120
>that ring

this dude is fucking married what the actual fuck

>>84380104
shonen should be manga for teenage boys if i remember correctly
and no, it was not too violent. Go Nagai mangas and even Tiger mask animer were more violent, even tho the last one had a different kind of violence

>>84380104
aimed at young boys

Anime is anigay

File: apu apustaja paitta pänle.png (21KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 657x527px

>watch whole hokuto no ken for the first time last year
>enjoyed it alot
>learn that it was aimet for kiddies
>people say that they grew up with hokuto no Ken.
makes me feel weird

>>84380298
its manliness kino. every man should watch it sooner or later.

>>84380130
You are clinically retarded

>>84380051
>too violent for children
there is literally no such thing. Some things could be too scary or horrific for children (as long as it has a happy end they don't seem to mind that much, tough), but never too violent.
You can traumatize a kid more with some mildly scary ghost show than with all the cartoon violence in the world

File: April.jpg (91KB, 526x770px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 526x770px

>>84380051
Wasn't meant for kids, just like the original TMNT.