Lol holy fuck
You got me excited for a blunder
Why do you lie
I really hope thats real.
I love classic Spidey... anything past "MARVEL NOW" is GARBAGE.
Even if it's bad it'll still get a 60+ easily.
It will get 93%
>people actually go to the effort to make these fakes to make themselves feel better
Pathetic.
JUST
>Ironman, Spiderman and Batman in a summer flick
>anything less than 210% certified fresh
Too much diversity not to be fresh.
>>84372346
I doubt Batman will be in it anon.
>>84372581
He means Michael Keaton.
>>84372223
DCcucks are THIS desperate
>>84372619
>the original batman doesn't even want to be in DC movies
BTFO how will DC EVER recover?
>>84372287
unironically this
>>84372325
This is what trolling is nowadays.
i won't watch any Spider-Man movie not directed by Raimi. just doesn't feel right. even with Jewish meddling, SM3 was a good movie.
>>84372325
Fake news like this actually does a lot of damage.
Normie who glanced at fake screenshot: "I hear it got a bad tomato score"
Friend: "Figured. Well I'm not seeing it then"
x 100 down the grapevine.
Will critics finally wake the fuck up for Homecoming?
I just saw Doctor Strange and checked the RT score and it's FUCKING 90%. That movie with pretty cool special effects, Cabbagepatch doing a poor man's RDJ impression, the most bland forgettable villain and love interest in history and a quip a minute is the living embodiment of a C+ and critics put it at 90%. Complete nonsense.
>>84373018
average rating 7.3, though
the 90% is just the amount of reviews that were 5+ (or maybe 6+) out of 10
>>84373000
>normies
>not saying "well if some pretentious critic didn't like it I better go see it twice xDD"
reminder
>>84373118
>what could've been
DELETE THIS
>>84373000
>implying a screenshot of a bad review score will do any damage to normies seeing mother fucking SPIDERMAN
literally everybody knows Spider-Man and everybody is going to see it.
>>84373018
I turned it off. When he woke up in the hospital and McAdams said 'no one could've done better', talking about his hands, I guessed his reply with 100% accuracy. Did the same thing twice after that. These superhero movies are insanely formulaic and it's getting fucking depressing.
>>84372223
WW was fucking dogshit and that got a 92. this isn't going to get anything loser than an 80.
>>84373018
>and critics put it at 90%
How are there people that still don't understand how RT works? All a 90% score means is that at least 90% of the critics thought it was at least a 6/10 movie.
>trusting Sony
>>84372223
>Marvel shit
>anything but certified fresh with the amount of shekels Disney is paying for reviews
>>84373875
No that's a recommendation to watch it. There been good reviews that went rotten and the same the other way around.
>>84372298
This. If Dr. Strange can 90% on RT this sure as shit can.
>>84372223
Bring back Raimi!
>>84372223
>>84373018
That film had a villian?
>>84374946
Trailers were a mistake
>>84373018
i actually got so fucking bored that i kept ordering beer. i had to go outside and smoke a cigarette.
came back and that bald head chick was atral projecting some stupid shit that didnt make any sense. what a waste. dont get me started on gotg2
>>84372670
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK-OSTfpdMA
???
Even Keaton knows the Marvel movies are trash and he's fucking in one
>>84373018
The movie was if house and iron man 1 had a baby.
>>84372223
Add 90% to that score and you'll be close
Could you at least make the numbers a little more believable? Are DCucks acting out this badly these days?
You should have give it more believable scores, even trash Marvel movies get good ratings.