Mind = BLOWN

EPIC NAHUI

Is there a more profound moment in the history of cinema than this, /tv/?

>>84368362
Rowling is a fucking hack

I can't believe that was the best anagram she could think of.
Why didn't she go with something like Tom Devold?

Here for the copypasta

File: 1490031333197.jpg (2MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1623x2886px

More like I am Lord moldy butt in in one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"BRAAAAAAP!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: mind.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

You could say that my Mind = BLOWN that not enough people regard Harry Potter as one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>84368854
>>84368934
There it is

>>84368727
>Tom Devold
Yours is even worse, kill yourself.

>>84368854
>"BRAAAAAAP!"
holy shit...

>>84368997
They're actually both imposters filename. But still doing the lord's work.

File: Untitled.png (4MB, 1414x2080px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1414x2080px

It's a good question to build one of the boring franchises in the history of the franchise, the movie Boy Wizard, and his friends from the Hogwarts Academy. They broke away from each other to fight the villains. The following combinations. One side of the sad fantasy series is the lack of enthusiasm for stabilization and the use of special effects to use all the spells that do not follow the guiding principle seem to be inactive.

Perhaps death was left when Rauling spielberg chanted the idea of directing the series; She believes that the series is a work of art for her book, where everyone is wrong in any way. Cross promotions do not make a nonsense profit. The Harry Potter series may be anti-Christian (or not), but of course it's surprising that the anti-James Bond series in denial of beauty and enthusiasm. No one wants to face such facts. Now, fortunately, they have to do now.

> Gg is a good book at least.
"Not!"
Writing is terrible, this book is awesome. As I have read, I have seen that every time there is a walk, the author rather writes the character. "Spread his legs"

I began to mark that phrase repeatedly at the back of the envelope. I stopped after just after I had marked several dozen envelopes at times. I did not believe Rowling's idea was so chaotic and a stereotype that he had no other writing style controlled by. After I read the grand review, let's review the Harry Potter by Stephen King alike. He said some of the effects were written, "These children are reading Harry Potter books at the age of 11 or 12, so when they grow up, they have to read Stephen King," and he was very upset. He said that irony was not made. In fact, you were trained to read Stephen King when you read "Harry Potter".

>>84369266
Is this written by a spambot?

>>84369266
>Writing is terrible, this book is awesome
>the author rather writes the character "spread his legs"
kek

>>84368854
>>84368934
Meme image, maybe, but Don Quixote is perfectly placed.

It really is a pinnacle of human achievement

>>84368362
Elegant proof that Rowling is nothing more then mediocre writer who got lucky once by coming up with a cool story premise that she'll milk for the rest of her life

File: you.jpg (54KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 720x540px

>>84368854
>i read fiction

>>84368727
Tom Riddle was a normal sounding name to show a normal origin, the real hackness was having an anagram at all.

TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE
DILDO LOVER RAT MAN

>>84368854
my god you are such a faggot

File: 1479258620673.png (970KB, 1600x1330px) Image search: [Google]

970KB, 1600x1330px

>>84368362
>I Am Lord Drumpf