Theory

>>84323721
>implying /tv/ know the Ginger Snaps trilogy
Too much kino

>>84323837
Shit there was 3 of them?
I only knew of 2. But Emily Perkins was the only reason I watched the first one and that's only because she was in IT.

File: ginger snaps.png (323KB, 590x339px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 590x339px

I like the twins best.
The pooinloo was a blatant self-insert, though.

>>84323936
I have always meant to rent that 3 in local rental but never did until it closed

>>84323936
perkins is in all 3. the 3rd is the least interesting and magically transports the story to the wild west. watch it at your own peril.

>>84324081
this
the third is the weakest one with the highest budget

>>84324081
Oh yeah I think I remember reading that somewhere now. Wasn't interested after that

>>84323936
>>84324047
Three was set in on the frontieer of colonial America. When you get past the gimmicky aspects of the franchise it was a decent fantasy/horror period peice.

>>84323721
She looks strangely like a guy I knew
Long face and comically emo

>>84324472
Lana Rain?

File: 19.jpg (661KB, 3011x2001px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 3011x2001px

Ginger Snaps came out before Donne Darko

File: 1268891287892.jpg (30KB, 337x404px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 337x404px

>>84323721
which are a pleb's idea of good movies

File: 3.jpg (715KB, 2001x3011px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 2001x3011px

>all these Ginger Snaps thread lately

Did you watch it for the first time, OP, and just want to talk about it, but don't know how to start up a discussion?

File: 1498423728409.jpg (3MB, 3035x3932px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3035x3932px

Wasted years...