Just re-watched Spider-Man 1 and 2 back to back. First one is

use the //archive for over 9000 answers for that very same question

File: The only good part of Spider-Man 3.webm (3MB, 640x264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x264px

>About to watch the third one, was it that bad?

Yes, only the first two films in Raimi's white power masterpiece are worth watching,

3 is bad because they felt the need to cram three villains into one movie when one villain only previously worked for the last two films

Pros
>Hottest Gwen Stacy
>great action sequences
>genuinely funny moments
>anything involving Aunt May

Cons
>almost everything involving MJ
>Gwen Stacy is not so much a character as she is a piece of eye candy to make MJ jealous
>Venom
>Harry isn't the main villain
>too many villains (3)
>too many characters in general
>too many subplots, many of which barely get any development because of how cramped the movie is

I'd still deem it rewatchable though, despite all that.

>>84255099
>doesn't like SM3
>posts the best scene of the raimi trilogy

File: 1497791485800.jpg (73KB, 1280x690px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1280x690px

>>84255014
>First one is a bit rough
What the FUCK?
DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH I SACRIFICED?

The only good thing that came out of it were the dancing Peter and the "oh so good" pie eating gifs

THE HUMAN HOLOCAUST

>>84255014
It's just okay, but better than any ines that came after

>Both the Amazing Spider-Man and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has higher IMDB score than Spider-Man 3

>>84255994
To be fair, TASM 2 has 60,000 fewer ratings than spiderman 3 does. If it had an equal number it's rating would probably be about the same, maybe .1 lower. Then again, TASM 2 doesn't deserve more than 4.