>Ever since the Motion Picture Association of America started providing descriptions for their film ratings, it's been kind of funny to read why films are given the labels that they've been bestowed. Though in the case of films like the two-part adaptation of Stephen King's IT, it also helps give us a clue as to just how brutal the film might be. And sure enough, with the film's confirmed R rating being handed down today, the description aligns with almost everything you'd expect to see in an IT movie. So why is IT rated R? It's for the following aspects:
>Violence/horror, bloody images, and for language.
>For those of you who were still somehow worried that New Line and Warner Bros. would chicken out and deliver a PG-13 to the IT remake, you can be assured that's not happening any time soon. In fact, based on IT's description above, the Andres Muschetti film sounds like it'll stay in line with a lot of the more dark and gruesome aspects that Stephen King included in his original book. Though seeing as even the film's producers have been hyping up an R rating from the script level, it's not too much of a surprise.
/tv/ btfo
Horror masterpiece incoming
>>84154075
computer, delete this failure of a thread.
end program
>>84154075
We're not going to see your flick, shill