Why aren't news sites talking about how bad Rough Night flopped?
>>84145992
>a bunch of liberal fucknuts are in it
>media doesn't report on its failure
Colour me shocked
>>84145992
>30-40 years old kikes partying all night
>Nobody is interested
wow
>>84146157
then what about Ghost in the Shell
>>84146234
is this about a lesbian bridal party?
Anything that doesn't have a Marvel, DC, or Star Wars logo flops. It's a foregone conclusion.
>>84145992
Apart from this thread, OP, I've never even heard of it.
>still managed to get 49% on RT
lol how can anyone take that shit seriously
>>84146283
It didn't have the lefts national sweetheart Kate McKinnon in it
>>84146234
This they are all Jew!!! women
>>84146372
You have to remember that the jew is highly over represented in the industry, critics are no exception.
>remake very bad things
>but put silly music in it so the seriousness of the situation never sets in
>but also make it with women
yikes
>>84145992
Every once in a while (roughly annually) the Jews accidentally make a movie way too Jewish for literally anyone else to enjoy.
>>84146372
Let me guess: all the negative reviews downplay the film as bad but praise the funny female talent
>>84145992
Didn't cost much to make so the studio isn't taking a big hit on it.
>>84147187
Exactly this
Its odd how in male-driven movies the critics wont go off about how "talented the main cast was" yet in every one of these all female cast flicks the reviewer has to add the obligatory, "The girls are great! A revelation!" as if actresses are owed some sort of consolation prize saying "You are in a movie. Hooray you!"
>>84145992
Ive never even heard desu
>>84147187
>vaginas want equality
>equality = coddling ie special treatment
>this isn't every special interest group ever
Grats m8. You're waking up
>Movie looks like shit
>Is shit
>Makes shit
>"A SONY PICTURES PRODUCTION"
Every Fucking Time
>>84146374
Jesus you'll find excuses for anything
>>84147541
The real reason is that people were interested in how GitS would do. First big budget live-action anime since Dragonball, and that shit was horrendous. No one cares about OP'S movie, which I already forgot the name of
Why does a japanese company produce the most sjw shit in america?
>>84146372
That's still a pretty bad score, but the flopping and the score aren't really related. It failed because nobody bothered to see it, which isn't represented by the RT score. It's probably also mediocre to bad, but some people didn't hate it.
>>84146157
>complains about jewish liberal movies
>on a hollywood tv and film board
what the fuck lmao
>>84145992
illana glazer looks just like this hairy jewish QT i banged for a few months in yosemite. that was 4 years ago. im a neet again now and sometimes i have dreams about her tits bumping into my face while she rid me or her butthole right in front of me while she sucked my dick. i miss you katy.
>>84145992
>less than 10 million on opening weekend
guess you could say they has a *puts on sunglasses* rough night
>>84146283
That was culturally appropriating. It was morally right to report it's failure.
>>84150854
jesus christ finally
>>84148952
The film division is Western arm.
The company as a whole is embarrassed by it.
>>84145992
this made my day anon thank you from the bottom of my heart
so glad no one thought this was worth their time especially with that hack mckinnon doing an accent because shes not funny in the slightest even with a wacky accent
Any female nudity? I'll support the film if its got tits.
>capeshit
>ghost in the shell
>rough night
i didn't realize mannequins could do so well in hollywood
I'm glad it failed. It was extremely problematic, treating the death of a male sex worker as a joke.
>>84145992
Because nobody expected otherwise.
>>84145992
I've never even heard of this movie until this thread
>>84150589
Really bad release date for one thing. I guess they were hoping for a Bridesmaids style sleeper hit.
>>84150905
what if the japanese just want to ruin america?
>>84150819
>>illana glazer looks just like this hairy jewish QT
How hairy was she exactly, please post a detailed description.