name one flaw. protip its not possible

MARTHA?!

>>84143443

A character's name is not a flaw.

Overestimated its audience

>>84143418
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5tSpgU96WY

even with the ultimate cut its extremely bloated. Horrendously edited. Poorly cast. Baldly acted. Lazily written. Painstakingly dull. Unbelievably boring. Unnecessarily broody. Terribly paced. And that is just the first hour, there is still two more hours left.

The shear number of pointless subplots are simply staggering. Plot holes? You mean mystery elements. The fact that someone read the script and decided it was worthy of spending over 250 million to bring it to the screen boggles my mind. This is what happens when you take five different scripts that have no sense of correlation. Did editing and streamlining the story not cross anyone's mind.

The production is big on making terrible decisions and this is clearly evident in the casting. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luther is laughably bad giving his rejected Social Network performance as twitching Mark Zuckerberg. Gal Gadot is by far the biggest miscast. Most people complained when she cast due to her poor physicality and zero resemblance to Wonder Woman. Those points are fine, but the biggest drawback is that she's frankly not a good actress. She has the emotional range of a potato. Her big reveal in costume is complete with a 'cool' guitar rift like it's some Robert Rodriguez film. During action scene she is replaced by her cgi double which obviously looks bigger and muscular in comparison to Gal Gadot's actual physical appearance. I just couldn't help by have a good chuckle at that.

File: 1497886819789.jpg (184KB, 814x960px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 814x960px

>bad acting
>bad script
>incoherent story
>shallow as fuck "themes"
>unlikable characters all around
>one of the worst villains in the history of comic book movies
>movie doesn't follow its own pre-established rules (why could Superman hear Lois but not his own mother?)
>killing off the series' most important character in the second movie
>ultra-grimdark (i.e. blowing up congress for no reason)
>batman kills dozens of people
>superman kills dozens of people
>obvious ripoff of Iron Giant in that one scene
>Amy Adams and Henry Cavil have no chemistry at all
>Lois does a bunch of pointless shit in the second half to "give her something to do"
>CGI looked terrible
MoS started this franchise out with a rotten core; it's really no surprise that the same characters collapsed again in another shitty movie.

>>84143532
The biggest misstep in the entire production is the appointment of Zack Snyder as director. It seem like he just walked of the set of making Watchmen and nobody seemed to tell him that he wasn't contracted to direct a lackluster patchwork Watchmen sequel. An opening scene that features Jeffrey Dean Morgan being killed with a slo-mo shot of a shell casing exiting a gun; the government against masked vigilantes, a powerful god-like superhuman figure; a man that dresses in a black costume and fights crime with gadgets coming out of retirement; the death of a famous hero; not one, but three funeral scenes. How is this not recycling elements of Watchmen.

Zack Snyder has the inability to direct scenes where no action takes place and he can't mask it with stylish cgi backgrounds like he did in 300. Simply put when there's no explosions it dull and boring. Simple character interactions prove to be a struggle for a director who still gets his philosophy for his movies from teenage web forums. Religious references that completely lack subtlety and elegance doesn't make you movie 'intellectual'.

Other grievances include: a scene and a plot point that revolves around urine; Lex Luther's so called evil plan; Knightmare; a hyped fight that just ends up being a normal fistfight; and actual teaser trailers for future movies in the franchise.