BBC news malfuction.

>>84136910
i bet you enjoy watching the bbc huh

Any breakfast bros catch a glimpse of that fat tits weather ladies feet this morning
Bloody hell

File: kek (2).jpg (48KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 490x490px

>>84136910
Its like an adult swim skit or something

File: watto.png (7KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 501x585px

>>84136910
>bongs are forced the pay for this shit or they will be jailed

BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

>>84136935
I love malfunctioning BBC

Did this actually happen, or was this edited together?

>>84137233
This happened 10pm last night

File: DudeWhat.jpg (43KB, 255x191px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 255x191px

>paying for a tv licence
>not just putting up a little antenna inside of your house and getting dozens of channels for free like literally everyone else

Ayy

>>84136910
jus do anything???

>>84137342
But they have vans to detect that

File: license.jpg (41KB, 468x286px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 468x286px

>>84137342
>not just putting up a little antenna inside of your house

That's how they get you

(((BBC NEWS)))

Watch the BBC drones squirm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8nDDyoTqec

File: 1497654515642.gif (459KB, 480x610px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 480x610px

>when the BBC malfunctions

File: huw.webm (3MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x450px

>>84136983
Her nudes leaked a month or so ago btw.

>>84137233
Actually happened, I watched it live and captured it for Brit/pol/.

>>84137549
>captured it for Brit/pol/.

Christ you people are bored

>>84137567
I mean, it really was no effort at all. All you need is half a brain (and a copy of OBS).

File: IMG_5883.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>84136983
Just look at her actual fat tits & meaty pussy. The leaks are on phun.

The AI controlling the UK needs firmware updates

File: nat.png (236KB, 714x940px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 714x940px

News at Ten having such serious malfunctions is actually a fairly big deal 2bf.

>>84137586
This is /tv/ just turn off your brain bro XD

>>84137588
Who is this and what is phun?

>>84137627
>people panicking about the world ending because the mandatory government propaganda they have to pay for doesnt tell them what to think for 4 minutes

Sad! Britain was a mistale

Similar to that Russian ambassadors assassination in the art gallery, the universe is providing us with avant garde artistic masterpieces just by accident. Most patrician timeline

>>84137663
>Britain was a mistale

What did he mean by this?

>>84136910

This is a skit, right?

>when news is breaking so fast you can't even report it

File: 1443908927995.gif (2MB, 448x252px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 448x252px

>bongs have to pay for this

>>84136910
absolute kino, wish news in the US was like this

>>84137391
>>84137384
you can't detect a fucking receiving antenna you retards only transmitters

File: nekrassov.jpg (159KB, 915x479px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 915x479px

>>84137438
I like the cut of this guy's jib.

File: mong-schafernacker.jpg (23KB, 238x286px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 238x286px

>>84137588
I believe that's what's known in the trade as an "occluded front".

>I've never worked in media of any sort
Shit malfunctions so frequently that it's a miracle things ever work at all.

>>84137438
>ywn be paid to shitpost on TV

>>84137750
Woah calm down with the technical language, you're speaking like a man who really knows what he's talking about!

>>84136910
>Drawing penises on his notes.

>>84137661
It's Carol Kirkwood. Phun is a website.

Now fuck off and learn how to use AltaVista.

>>84137796
Cute. You can have all of the cords snugly connected into the right ports and something will still manage to go wrong. It's just the nature of working with lots of tech. Sound systems for concerts are the same way. Even with lots of testing beforehand something can malfunction.

wtf I hate liberals now

>>84137342
The legality isn't about owning a TV, but receiving broadcasts. So, no, that's still illegal.

>>84136984
Are you talking about Tim and Eric, Eric andre, or the failed world peace? Be specific

>>84137549
FOKIN LEGEND M8

>>84137823
What's AltaVista?

>>84137834
What's a cord? Can you dumb it down a bit more for us, person who has worked in media?

If you watch the BBC you have to pay some money for it. Why cannot people understand this?

does anyone of the scottish news cip when it keeps going to nazi clips?

>>84137524
who?

>>84138008
nevermind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLQqKm9GEng

File: Joel-ItStinks.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>84136910

>the solemn ticking of the clock
>the perfect timing of the breaking news bump
>camera panning
>the lock of disgust and disappointment the anchor has

he makes me feel like I just walked in on him masturbating

>>84138029
Allie Sin

>>84137879
Why don't you Ask Jeeves to find out pleb.

>>84136935
>Pass user since 2012

>>84138070
Just Lycos that shit

File: goodjerb.gif (2MB, 158x158px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 158x158px

>>84138082
This guy gets it.

>>84138032
The funniest news glitch of all time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QVzKihKiYI

>>84137438

>THIS IS FAKE NEWS!

the madman, voice of reason

EPIC FAIL XD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6Y2uQn_wvc

>>84136910
Can you even imagine being a britcuck?

>>84138164
>It's appropriate because she's Indian so she'd be dick-in-shit
What did he mean by this?

>>84138227
He meant Poo in Loo.

>one technical hiccup that EVERY CHANNEL ON THE PLANET gets from time to time invalidates the entire licence system

Get over yourselves children

>>84138183
cringe

>>84136910
wtf I love the bbc now

>>84138270
cringe at your newfaggotry

>>84138306
double cringe

File: 1476990136008.jpg (107KB, 501x443px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 501x443px

>>84137438
Absolutely fantastic.

>>84138032
this is fucking gold

>>84137233
It actually happened.
Look at 2:30 when everyone in the background starts panicking looking at him and at the screens

>>84138266
Yeah this lol

>>84138227

He's a Kiwi so he doesn't give a fuck. I think he got his own show after this. If he were in the UK he would be lynched

>>84136910

The new Twin Peaks is a lot more experimental this time around.

>>84136910
it's fucking brass eye

File: George-Costanza-9.jpg (27KB, 605x454px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 605x454px

>>84136910
>RobinHoodUKIP

this is kino

Brexit is taking its toll on the bong

>>84138728
Need to dub Green Onions over the footage.

File: 18670734_10155162539283046_8679314940593300421_n.jpg (18KB, 284x423px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 284x423px

>>84136910

File: 1430372491363.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>84136910
>PANIC slowly escalates in the background

He's not even pretending to shuffle his papers around

Why did no one just say "start reading news bro"?

Like just knock on the glass with a sign or something.

>>84137529

Link them

File: 1373505084249.png (58KB, 358x283px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 358x283px

>>84136910
I didn't knew the BBC was into youtube poops

>>84136910
Damn, he just gets straight into it like nothing at the very end. Good stuff.

>>84136935
typical since4pass poster

>>84137660
Retard.

>>84138029
Some dumb damaged goods slut, did porn while being 18 year old ward of the state

>>84137718
they can definitely detect antennas. Don't waste your time telling me you can't do it, apparently they can

>>84137027
Do you think taxes go into the bbc? It's funded by tv licenses, which you only need to buy once.

don't Americans also pay for the useless waste of airtime that is PBS? Although they collect the money in a non-retarded non-Orwellian way

File: bob enjoying a slice of pizza.png (2MB, 973x709px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 973x709px

>>84139326
pic related
the only good thing that ever came from pbs.

That was quite funny. I don't know why people are making a fuss so much, it's just a run of the mill cock-up.

>>84139326
NPR is way worse than PBS

I don't get how it went on for so long is the thing

I could understand if it was a minute, but four is just mental

>>84139326
>paying for PBS
is it hard work being this stupid?

>>84139375
>Sesame Street
>Ken Burns
>Frontline
>Nature
>This old House

>Jobs and prosperity must come first

Says the communists who want to see everyone in the country slaughtered by muslims

>>84139478
what do you think the P in PBS stands for? I'll let you take your time

>>84138032
>and here's Hitler with the weather!

File: retard_1.png (680KB, 600x542px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 600x542px

>>84139272
>which you only need to buy once

... a year, you retard.

>>84139594
>he'd rather pay £240 a year to get Jewpert Murdoch's executive advert injection service

>>84137438
>Putinbots

Yawn.

whys it so fuckin hot today lads

>>84137438
he didn't say jack shit, this was a waste of 14 minutes

>>84137438
>the ECB is having to pump 80 billion of new money into the economy every month
>if it stops this quantitative easing it is finished
>this is fake news!

Jesus Christ these EU shill are either barefaced liars or delusional

>>84139704
You think you have it hot? Friend, in las vegas its 48 celcius now.

>>84137736
>@StirringTrouble
>@AhahahImPoliticallyIncorrectYouNormies
>@ShitpostingtoAnnoyPeople
Free Speech Warrior are the new cringe

File: i_kekd_3.jpg (100KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 640x427px

>>84138032
LMAO'ing my arse off.

>>84137879
Like a newer version of Excite.

>>84137438
>>84137736
I hope he stays safe, guy has a huge target on his back I think by now

>>84136935
nice reddit badge

File: 1336830961690.gif (3MB, 290x189px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 290x189px

>>84138032
>they go back to the woman's picture again

>>84138266
No, the advent of the 21st century invalidates the licence system.

>>84138032
>Heres kat with the weather!
>hitler screaming
pretty sunny I take it

>>84139683
>implying the BBC hasn't been run by Jews since the year dot

>>84137904
stop being a faggot,the more parts of a machine there are=more chance of failure and they talking abgout a shit load of cables constantly being moved around.
never trusted the BBC since moira left but I would smack that scottish weather girls back doors in while she crooned in that accent.

>>84139792
Pretty much

I agree in principle but they're such twats that I end up hating them.

File: Naga-Munchetty.jpg (27KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 615x409px

>>84137823
always been more of a fan of naga desu

>>84139867
That's Goebbels you retarded faggot

>>84138032
well that's a beautiful weather

>>84140007
who?

>>84139704
I just looked it up, and it's only 83F/28C. That's completely normal summer weather; is that unbearable to you weak inbred fucks?

>>84140083
that's way above their average weather temperture.

File: fb09a73d0fcfa5f3914e8d22456a3e8a.png (19KB, 506x355px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 506x355px

>>84140102
Not where I live.

>>84137736
>cremedelekremlin.com

Top jej

File: b612d32f9ee21b44fb3561d5eed1e7fb.png (18KB, 502x374px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 502x374px

>>84140102
>>84140146
Here's the winter averages, for comparison. I feel bad for people who don't get a full cycle of seasons, and never get to experience everything that weather has to offer.

>>84137663
>mandatory government propaganda
Except it isn't. The BBC is a self-sustaining bureaucracy with an agenda of its own. It's a force-feeding machine for political correctness and identity politics.

The BBC is a major political force in the UK, and no politician has the balls to challenge it. We literally cannot get rid of it, however outdated it looks in 2017.

>>84140146
>illinois
my condolences

>>84140165
It's not a terrible place when you're a rural NEET.

>>84140075
The first one that screams after him it's hitler. Goebbels was the propaganda minister of the 3rd reich

>>84140164
The BBC are bound by legal contract to operate to a set of standards. Obviously it is full of sinister people with their own agendas but they get taken to task regularly. If they didn't they'd be even worse.

why is britain going crazy

File: 1335352456243.jpg (20KB, 243x322px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 243x322px

>>84140339
the elites are accelerating their plans.

>>84139326
PBS isn't anywhere near the size of the BBC.

>>84140164
>We literally cannot get rid of it

Incorrect. It's currently dying because people aren't paying the licence fee any more because they don't watch live television any more.

>>84137524
is that Allie Sin?

File: Breakfast1_20120917_0756-14.jpg (310KB, 1020x574px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1020x574px

>>84139977

nice taste there anon!

i do like the spicy variety of presenters they have especially this one. its Alice bhandakravi

>>84139847
>IT'S 2017!!

Nice argument pham

pathetic britbongs and their news channel

>>84140766
What's the black woman who does the sports called?

>>84137524
Probably drugs, right? She's got that look of being 18 and 30 simultaneously

>>84140326
You're thinking of the BBC Trust, which has been abolished. All that's required of the BBC nowadays is that they stick to Ofcom rules, just like Babestation and Russia Today ...

>>84136935
Yeah, the BBC is a solid source for news. Unless you are autistic.

>>84140794
So if the BBC didn't exist, you think it would be invented today?

>Hey folks, you know what this country needs? A new TV channel! No, a whole bunch of TV channels! And radio stations too! And a bloody great raft of subsidiaries, from local to international level! All they'll all broadcast the same kind of crap you get for free elsewhere!
>By the way, you'll all have to become subscribers, whether you use it or not.

Awesome argument pham.

File: 1498021822130.png (295KB, 450x452px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 450x452px

>>84137567
>I captured 4 minutes of just some dead air
Woah, you're truly a patriot bringing down the system aren't you?

File: 1496762001825.jpg (32KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x450px

>>84136910

>>84136935
xD so clever, have an upboat Reddit Gold user good sir.

>>84139326
>PBS is useless waste
>American teenagers actually think this

>>84137524
Fucking Allie Sin man, holy shit, my poor pubescent balls.

>>84139394
There is legitimately nothing wrong with NPR you delusional faggots.

>>84136910
Kind of reminds me of /pol/ actually

>>84139977
She's short, has no ass nor tits

>>84141166
>There is legitimately nothing wrong with NPR
listen to the Radiolab episode on debating and then come back to me. I know they're on WNYC right now but I think that episode was from the NPR days

File: noice boat.png (284KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 640x360px

>>84136910
nice boat

File: 1645689768565.jpg (56KB, 696x695px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 696x695px

>>84140766

>>84141289
>listen to this thing that probably doesn't discredit or really do anything to make NPR look bad but since we,are all autistic, probably think it's some truly ebin takedown of one of the most solid news outlets around.
Fuck off, NPR is still one of the most objective sources of information in the US and I get so fucking sick of this schizo /pol/ meme. We aren't talking about CNN or Fox here...

>>84141363
>listen to this thing that probably doesn't discredit or really do anything
just listen to it. Trust me on this. You don't have to get back to me in the thread, just find it and whenever you have the time go through it.

>>84141363
Anon, I listen to NPR, it is pretty bias.

>>84141444
Every news has some sort of bias, that's reality. The question is HOW objective are they? This childish attitude that NPR is not even news, when it is probably the best fucking news we have now, just shows how paranoid /pol/ has made some of you.

File: ic-5492.png (58KB, 230x257px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 230x257px

>>84136910
Breddy decent reaction pics tho

>>84141070
This argument is entirely specious and you know it, it could be made for pretty much anything.

File: naga-pasha-2-940x529.jpg (76KB, 940x529px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 940x529px

>>84141246
but shes a qt

>>84141412
>I'm not going to link my apparent "gotcha" moment to prove my claim
I'm not going to live my life in a state of panic thinking that the only place to get news is neckbeards on YouTube or image macros.

>>84141493
If you want unbias, there are better sources then a radio program that uses public funding reporting on a political party that has a public position of cutting public funding.

>>84141541
took me 5 secs on google
http://www.radiolab.org/story/debatable/
don't you dare not listen to it and claim you did

just for clarity: I was a big fan of radiolab before this and then I immediately unsubbed. And I'm not a /pol/tard

>>84137879
Top tier search engine in days before google. Lycos, web crawler, excite, couldn't hold a candle

>>84139039
Because there was no audio. You hear his mic come on near the end and then he starts reading.

>>84137866
Off the Air

>>84141570
So your argument is "it uses some public funding, so I can't trust it because the administration wants to cut public funding"? I'm sure there is equally good news somewhere else, but that doesn't make NPR a poor source at all. You are being a but autistic about one of the last real news outlets out there. It's not fake news or even poor news.

>>84137990

Because that's not the law, the law is if you have any device capable of viewing any BBC material, which means a smartphone or PC.

>>84141638
*bit

>>84141533
>This argument is entirely specious and you know it, it could be made for pretty much anything that you're forced to pay for whether you want it or not
ftfy

>>84141577
I don't understand how you think this really helps your argument though.

Who remembers this?

https://youtu.be/e6Y2uQn_wvc

>>84141680
your whole point was how great and unbiased NPR was, I'm giving you a little taste

>>84141638
no, dumbass, I'm saying its bias because the content is bias, then giving an example as to why the people at NPR would be bias. There are better news sources out there. Reuters is better, WSJ (not including the shitshow that is the opinion section) is better.

File: IMG_4384.jpg (27KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x360px

>>84141363

I never go to pol or care about teen thoughts on politics. Listened to NPR for years for music and prairie home companion. It is embarrassingly leftist at times, but generally just liberal. Just accept it and enjoy

>>84141444
>it is pretty bias.
>>84141570
>If you want unbias
>>84141712
>I'm saying its bias

BIASED. THE WORD YOU'RE LOOKING FOR IS BIASED

>>84141702
They are biased sometimes, woah you sure showed me. Looks like I should never listen to NPR ever again and just be an intellectual like you and mistrust everything, everywhere. Perhaps even collect some infographs made by retards

Fuck off, mate. NPR is still a decent source.

>>84141736
>it has a liberal slant
>that means I can't trust it
>I don't know what liberal even means anymore
Western society is liberal you fucking clods.

File: 1497630271230.jpg (24KB, 640x468px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 640x468px

>people still pay their TV licence in 2017

>>84141757
Thank ylu fkr getting worked up over spelling on a Congolese spider fighting forum

>>84141712
Yet you can't provide at least one example of bad or false reporting.

>>84141678
Except you aren't forced to pay for it - if you only ever watch Netflix etc there is no reason to pay

>>84141844
The other anon shot you a link, you haven't listened to it yet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzB2ex-cZpE

>>84141863
I did, it wasn't an example of bad or false reporting...

Fox and CNN literally make shit up and the only thing you have to justify being paranoid about NPR is that they have a bias.

>>84136910
This has to be some activation sequence. Expect more vans on sidewalks in the coming weeks.

>>84141858
>if you only ever watch Netflix etc there is no reason to pay
And if my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle.

>>84141937
You did? Yet made no response to that fact to the poster who posted it? Also, complaining that other sources are MORE bias is just trying to shift the discussion. Nobody is arfuing those sources are not bias.

>>84141533
Sorry

>>84141999
Are you trying to say that isn't the case? You literally just tick a box saying I don't watch live tv and they never hassle you again

>>84142010
Your argument seems to be "I can't trust this solid news outlet because there is a bias". You know that mantra that reality has a liberal bias? Well, that is more or less true for a lot of facts but it makes people screech. So what you think is an outright bias, can just be you not liking any facts that veer left.

There is bo goalpost shift here, there are establishment outlets who straight up lie to people and the worst offense you can pick out from the decades NPR has been on air, is one podcast...that shows a slight bias. No examples of false reports, no example of outright lying, no example of pushing a fake news narrative.

It's tame and it's not worth my energy.

>>84142085
Oh boy, now you try the whole "reality has a liberal bias" bs. Reality is reality, NPR has a bias, your argument is that it is better then Fox and CNN, sure, that doesn't excuse them though and there are better news resources then NPR.

File: 1488256158020.png (76KB, 161x242px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 161x242px

>>84142085
>reality has a liberal bias

>>84136910
I work in news and this seems like it was edited to be goofy.
The guy should know when his show starts. Usually it's at the top of the hour.

>>84136910
wat

>>84142139
than

>>84137438
>that little white knight manlet

>>84136910
I always thought that those scenes in movies where a guy is going about mind his own business while chaos and panic unfolded behind him was always a bit too unbelievable. But here it is, happening in real life. Pretty funny.

>>84142085
>reality has a liberal bias
what did he mean by this

>>84141689
They had him in the big fat quiz 2006. It was pretty funny.
https://youtu.be/0A8euEAREwU?t=243

>>84137529
Wow, they actually use the pen? But then again, what's the point in writing something down if you are just going to be reading off the teleprompter?

>>84142023
The point is that you can't watch live TV (including what is laughably called "Freeview") without paying off the BBC.

Why should the BBC even be allowed on Freeview when it's anything but free?

>>84142290
He has a liberal bias.

>>84137588
>Just look at her actual fat tits & meaty pussy. The leaks are on phun.
holy shit what a granny yummy yummy pussy

>>84137588
also, Luisa Zissman. those boobs are fake?

>>84142377
If you're that desperate to watch Britain's Got Talent or endless repeats of The Big Bang Theory you can quite easily watch them live through the relevant channels website or tv app

>>84136935
>he pays for 4chan

>>84139704
global warming

File: ctr.jpg (140KB, 741x838px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 741x838px

>>84139693
>>84139744
Fuck off neocons.

>>84136910
It's like a bad youtube poop

>>84136910
This would really be nice if you add VHS filter on it...
Hmmm

>>84140496
Remember it's now illegal to watch iplayer without a telly license too
>lol

>>84141689
What a fucking hero
Anybody know if he got the job afterwards?

>>84142139
>>84142159
>>84142290
>>84142393
It does though. None of you even know what the word liberal means anymore.

>>84142705
It would be pretty fucking retarded if you could watch iplayer for free, I don't know why anybody is surprised by that. You're paying for the content, not the privilege of watching it live

>>84140999
Eh, sometimes it can be emotionally manipulative.

I don't care for 100 days show either.

>>84142750
A liberal saying reality has a liberal bias is just masturbation.

Reality has no bias.

>>84142139
>reality is reality
Right, just like climate change is a concrete fact. The phrase doesn't mean that facts are themselves liberal and conservative, it means that facts like climate change, are obviously liberal positions.

>>84141076
Why did that trigger you so?

>>84142785
You don't even know I'm liberal.

>>84142803
>he responded to me
>he must be triggered

>>84142139
>they gave a bias
This has literally been your only argument and it doesn't just magically make them a bad news outlet.

>>84142795
Climate change itself is not a liberal position, the degrees and what to do is

>>84142862
a news outlet with a bias is bad senpai

>>84136910
I can't watch it right now. What happens?

>>84142867
There is no "degrees" on what to do, bud. It is a global crisis that literally the entire GOP is willing to outright ignore and if drastic measures aren't taken, there will be irreversible effects.

>>84142893
Everyone has a bias, the point is that even despite that, NPR is one of the more objective outlets out there. You just can't live your life in a paranoid state.

>>84142905
Tree hugging faggot

>>84142935
Right, great argument. I guess caring about breathable air makes me a faggot now.
>caring about trees is bad

File: triggered2.png (296KB, 364x400px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 364x400px

>>84142652
Fuck you too, Sergei.

Keep up the post quota, or you won't get your bonus this month.

>>84142905
lol, no, their are degrees and tradeoffs fag

>>84142926

>more objective

By what criteria? Your own personal bias?

>>84142926
>NPR
>objective

Shut your nigger mouth. A news outlet says things you agree with and you call that objective?

Dumbass.

>>84140766
I find Martine Croxel very gorgeous.

>>84143053
>REEEEEEEE NPR SAYS THINGS I NO NO LIKE!!! YOU A NIGGER!

>>84142750
It's pretty clear some people don't know what "projection" means anymore.

>>84143011
There aren't you fucking brainlet. That's a GOP dodge talking point.

>>84142926
and other sources are better

Post more bloopers.

>>84143030
By a history of objective reporting? By a good track record?

File: 1485062665444.png (24KB, 764x706px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 764x706px

>>84142994
>nationalism le ebil so we need to create a giant socialist super nation with it's own government, anthem and army

>>84143162
Indulge me, name one.

>>84143150
nope, its a fact. You've just been jerking off to your liberal leaders for so long that you don't realize any action we take has a cost.

>>84136910
Is this newskino?

>>84143198
Reuters

>>84143204
Of course it has a cost, literally nobody said it wouldn't. But you need to look at a bigger picture kiddo, you need to look at this as a gradually worsening problem. Which it is. How bad does the net loss of all ice caps have to get for you to understand that?

>>84143226
Yeah, I like them too.

>>84136983
Link me, bruv

Where and when, which weather girl

Fiona Bruce gives me a funny feeling downstairs

>>84143124
This entire site doesn't know what most words even mean anymore.

File: 1479493022375.jpg (78KB, 1000x960px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1000x960px

2deep4me

>>84143204
>breathable oxygen and livable temperatures may cost me personally a few extra dollars, I can't do that REEE!
The absolute state of America right now...having an actual debate of taking care of the fucking planet.

>>84143189
Wow, do you really get paid for pure shitposts? Don't you people have standards anymore?

Your supervisor won't be happy if he hears about this.

>>84143238
You need to look at the fact that we don't know the extent of damage over time quite yet, and that taking action has a possibly large cost in human lives. The debate is what action do we take that best manages both costs

>>84143354
>If you don't cut ALL carbon emission the world will completely die!
yeah faggot, keep sucking those dicks

>>84143413
>You need to look at the fact that we don't know the extent of damage over time quite yet
Yes, we do you fucking shelteted cunt, that's the issue here. We have people like you who are gullible enough and stupid enough to believe these anti-science talking points.

There is literally ongoing damage globally you dumb fuck.

>>84143449
>Big Oil told me carbon emissions are good.

>>84143449
Nobody is only saying that.

>>84143413
>protecting the planet
>will cost human lives
That's a new one.

>>84139704

You got Hilter doing the weather, m8. Its the fucking Apocalypse, that's fucking why.

>>84143238
left is 1celsius, right 3.7celsius. Per Nature.
It's probably too late to stop this but when Indonesia, India, Africa start reaching 110 degree days and 95 degree nights 300-350 days a year there is going to be a slight immigration problem, lol.

>>84143479
*sheltered

>>84143359
>everyone I don't like is a KGB agent
Enjoy the rest of Ramavan Khan.

File: image.png (78KB, 534x193px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 534x193px

>>84143567
oops

>>84136910
Today I have understood at last what it means to be professional.
What a man.

>>84136935
>since 2012

off yourself

File: retard_2.png (287KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 480x360px

>>84143573
>KGB

File: 1309_consensus-graphic-2015-768px.jpg (135KB, 768x466px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 768x466px

>>84143567
Holy shit, what is it like being this oblivious?

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/RisingCost/rising_cost5.php

Useful fucking idiot.

>>84143567
Here is that last link on global disasters

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/RisingCost/rising_cost5.php

You people are the problem.

>>84143479
dipshit, the projections have been wrong plenty of times
>>84143557
cutting emmissions now will hurt advancement of poorer countries which will cost lives

>>84143699
>dipshit, the projections have been wrong plenty of times
No, they haven't you stupid faggot. Almost every prediction has come true.
>cutting emmissions now will hurt advancement of poorer countries which will cost lives
None of this is even remotely true and I have no idea what retard convinced you of that. It doesn't even make any sense.

You types of deniers are frustrating.

File: Dude-Climate-Change.png (162KB, 1045x1567px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1045x1567px

>>84143567
>lets spend trillions of dollars to possibly lower global temperatures by a percentage of 1/10th a degree

>>84143699
Sometimes I forget that in an information age, we still have clods like this.

>>84143752
>No they haven't
Hahahahaha

Also, nigga read a book, do some research into economics. Developing countries rely on energy sources that tend to be "dirty". They do so because it is cheap and the countries are relatively poor. The benefit is their development.

>>84143771
>look at this rebbit post.
Yes, I forgot autists on rebbit were more of a credible source than NASA. Here, let me fix that greentext for you:
>be brainwashed by GOP talking heads to believe that climate change will cost gortrillions of dollars to scare me away from supporting any substantial climate change efforts, which just so happen to benefit massive oil and gas companies internationally. This is a coincidence though, so obviously we should just do nothing despite rising temperatures and crisis-tier effects that have literally started to destroy some of the third world. As long as I get to laugh at liberals.
Kill yourself you drone.

We can't stop rise of emissions without fucking india and china

>>84143903
>dude these group of organisations are more trustworthy than that group of organisations lmao
If you really cared you'd kill yourself and your family carbon producing scum.

>>84143928
India will certainly never stop if no one else is stopping too.There's some merit in making a move first.

>>84139272
oh wow much more reasonable

>>84143863
>hahahahaha
That's not an argument.
>read a book.
Why haven't you? If you did, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
>Developing countries rely on energy sources that tend to be "dirty".
I guess you missed the memo how much of the developing world is starting to jump into alternative energies given the fact that coal is a dying industry and the West has a monopoly on oil.

The conversation is about carbon emissions. There are vastly more positives than some made up economic scenario some retard on Breitbart told you.

http://www.oecd.org/dev/developing-countries-and-the-renewable-energy-revolution.htm

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/sep/15/five-developing-countries-ditching-fossil-fuels-china-india-costa-rica-afghanistan-albania

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_developing_countries

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

>>84143903
>Muh oil companies
kek

>>84143928
China is literally putting more effort into green energy now than the US and will overshadow us in the rising green energy market, thanks to pulling us out of the Paris Agreement.

What does your script tell you to say now?

>>84143752
The real estate firm I work for targets rich oil/gas people to make long term investments in Miami, Galveston, Nola real estate. Many of the EU and Chinese firms and investors that used to buy these places are selling due to concerns of sea level rise.

I guess these oil and gas people will get to find out if sea level will rise.

>>84144073
What is the argument here? That there is no big oil lobby in the US? Next to guns, they are one of the largest lobbies in the US.

>>84143985
Yes, NASA is more trustworthy than an oil company with a vested interest in oil...

>>84144041
Damn, you really are brainwashed, Developing countries still rely on dirty energy, many are switching over because it is becoming cheaper. However plugging your ears and trying to act like because that is happening, these countriea don't rely on old energy sourcea is just lies you heard you masters at Salon feed you. People like you who don't even treat this AS a conversation and instead attack anyone who has doubts on the means we should use are the problem.

>>84144093
Sea level is rising...
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

Do you faggots just not bother to look this up?

>>84144115
The problem is that trying to shut down any dissent by screaming about oil lobies is retarded

>>84144160
I'm brainwashed because I sourced y9u facts? I literally proved every point you just made wrong...

>>84144143
>give me more funding goy
Why don't you start shitting in a bucket and walking everywhere if you care so much while I enjoy my affordable energy and reasonable tax levels

>>84144196
your brainwashed because you think what you sourced is saying developing countries don't still rely on dirty energy

>>84144182
The problem is that there IS dissent on hard scientific data, that's the issue. There is a legitimate disinfo war to downplay environmental problems and it is chiefly due to powerful oil lobbies. That isn't a conspiracy, that is a reality.

>>84137027
>or they will be jailed
[citation needed]

>>84144082
that you're a /pol/ tier conspiratorial retard

File: 1470223744616.jpg (1MB, 3000x3420px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x3420px

>>84136910
>2.50
>shit's stick fucked? welp, I guess I'll check my mail or something

>>84144217
They aren't relying on it as much and it is less every year...

Did you even look at the sources I sent you? Regardless, this whole stupid tangent is a dodge; climate change is already fucking up these countries with increased storms, increased sea levels, increased temperatures and overall environmental disasters that are RIGHT NOW fucking up developing countries. Your autistic belief is for them to do nothing, on the off chance a Fox pundit is right and someone dies...somehow.

>>84144171
You misunderstand. I make a small commission on the transaction. The long term investment outcome is of little concern. Our firms (and others) are trying to dump land and properties in these areas to people who will overpay. I am counting on oil and gas industry members to not believe in sea level rise so they pay more for something other investors are fleeing.

>>84144290
Oh, gotcha.

>>84144281
What are you fucking talking about? Literally nothing I said was a conspiracy and I never post on /pol/ or even remotely go there.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/world/asia/china-renewable-energy-investment.amp.html

China is going to become a green energy competitor on the global stage you stupid faggot

>>84141363

I drive between Ottawa and Toronto quite a bit and I always listen to NPR when I'm close to the US border.

It's about as bad as CBC. Which is horrible.

>>84137438
Thank you based kremlinbot! I will surely sing the praises of Czar Putin now!

>>84144381
>It's about as bad as CBC. Which is horrible.
Why is it bad...?

>>84137736
>Nekrassov

Sure thing buddy.

>>84143104
My nigga!

>those piercing blue eyes
>those big fat mature baps.

>>84144209
>affordable energy
Green energy is going to eclipse natural gas in your lifetime and there are literally hundreds of thousands of private sector jobs in it that ensure competition and low prices but you rather have an energy monopoly that has you paying out the as s.

Well at least Trump will bring back a few hundred mining jobs, amirite?

>>84139326
PBS has some of the best War doc's I've seen and i'm not even American, they are so long and detailed. Its fucking Kino.

>>84139479
What's wrong with that? There will finally be peace on Earth.

>>84144115
>Much gun lobby
You know that the entire us gun industry is like a few hundred mil a year right? And that oil/power is billions and billions? You libs crying about the supposed him lobby having an iron grip on the entire government is absolutely laughable. You just can't fathom that anyone on Earth would disagree with you so it must be the work of some secretive shadowy cabal somewhere, just like 'muh russians'

>>84144288
They are relying on it less and less because it is becoming cheaper and easier every year, which only helps my point. The problem is people like you think that if someone disagrees on HOW we solve the issue, it means they think we should do nothing, like you just said. That was never my point, my point was that the discussion right now is weighing the costa and picking a decision on what the best way to proceed is

>>84144572
>They are relying on it less and less because it is becoming cheaper and easier every year, which only helps my point.
I'm trying to explain to you why this is wrong.
>my point was that the discussion right now is weighing the costa and picking a decision on what the best way to proceed is
But your position isn't based in actual facts to begin with...that's the crux of this whole autistic thing.

>>84144553
>You just can't fathom that anyone on Earth would disagree with you so it must be the work of some secretive shadowy cabal somewhere, just like 'muh russians'
1. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal cartoon.
2. Lobbyist groups do have immense political power over policy writing, this isn't a conspiracy.
3. The NRA is in fact, a very influential political group.

You need to relax hothead. Lobbies exist. I'll gloss over the obvious irony in this post too, concerning conspiracies, given where we are.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/19/taking-on-the-n-r-a/amp

http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-lobbying-money-national-rifle-association-washington-2012-12

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21647627-prevent-gun-deaths-politicians-offermore-guns-why-gun-lobby-winning

Gun lobby is one of the most influential lobbies in the US my naive friend.

>>84144611
Your trying to prove to me that green energy constantly becoming mor economical to implement, use, and rely on is unrelated to why countries are switching to it?

My argument is based completely on facts, you jist don't like the conclusions. The US cut down on a ton of our carbon emissions over the years, a large portion of that is actually a result of a switch to natural gas, since it has become cheaper.

>>84144457
>solar and wind can't compete even though their being pumped full of government money
Face it green fag if you want to save your planet it's nuclear or nothing.

File: Screenshot_2017-06-21-12-36-15.png (279KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1440x2560px

>>84144553
>You know that the entire us gun industry is like a few hundred mil a year right?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA


https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-trends/market-research-reports/manufacturing/fabricated-metal-product/guns-ammunition-manufacturing.html

>>84144783
>solar and wind can't compete
Except that isn't happening.

>>84144826
That actually is happening, Solar and wind operate on massive subsidies and are completely dependent on chinese rare earth metals.
I wonder why china is specifically pushing for wind and solar. Hmmm.

>>84144775
>My argument is based completely on facts
You literally have not sourced a single fact.
>The US cut down on a ton of our carbon emissions over the years
Sure? But there is a long way to go. There is more work to do.
>a large portion of that is actually a result of a switch to natural gas
No, that's not true. That didn't happen.
>since it has become cheaper.
But it really hasn't...

Would be great if you showed me where you get all this wrong information from. You just sound really obstinate here and don't like that you've been proven wrong by global stats.

Jesus, guys, i just wanted to laugh at some silly thing that happened on BBC, not talk about global warming

>>84144797
Yeah and oil is literally almost 2 trillion USD, even if the numbers are off to scale is not

>>84144797
not him, but I assume he is talking about the NRA/gun lobby

>>84138799
LET'S SHATTER SOME MYTHS

>>84144875
It's not happening:

http://www.greenpeace.org/africa/en/campaigns/Climate-change/renewable-energy-myths/

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-15/world-energy-hits-a-turning-point-solar-that-s-cheaper-than-wind

China is pushing wind and solar because it is an investment that makes them a green energy giant. They want a monopoly on where the future of energy is going...which is green.

>>84144966
Yes...which is one of the most powerful lobbies in the US.

>>84144923
You are so blind to your religion anything someone says that you don't like must be a lie or fake. Here, I went out of my way to find a source that is biased in your favor that STILL agrees with what I said

https://www.skepticalscience.com/frackingandCO2.html

>>84144944
And? I never said oil wasn't a powerful lobby.

>>84145045
and the dollar amounts are more in line with what he said.

File: Screenshot_2017-06-21-12-47-14.png (342KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1440x2560px

>>84144875
Oops.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2017-01-03/for-cheapest-power-on-earth-look-skyward-as-coal-falls-to-solar

>>84145102
not him, but read your own article bro, it is cheaper in some places, and EXPECTED to be cheaper all over in 10 years

>>84145062
>here, look at my global warming skeptic website
Oh boy. I want a credible source backed by data, not some climate denier website made by some dumb faggot.

Do you have any research from credible scientists? Perhaps world economic stats on developing nations and alternative energy? Bloomberg? Reuters data on developing economies? NASA climate data on developing nations? Perhaps a world economic report?

>>84145089
He said a few million...

File: Screenshot_2017-06-21-12-52-46.png (1MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2560px

>>84145172
Double oops!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/energy-costs-at-record-lows-thanks-to-natural-gas-and-clean-energy/

>>84145239
A few HUNDRED million you illiterate dope

>>84145315
But the number is in the trillions. You dope.

>>84145199
>didn't even read the link
Want to know how I know? The source is anti-climate denier. It says so right on the site. In addition it links to an actual research paper for its source

>>84145272
doesn't change the fact that your previous link says coal is cheaper

>>84136910
youtube poop kino

>>84145348
16B = multiple trillion

Kys

>>84145396
>I didn't read it.
Coal is dying. There is no money or jobs in it anymore.

>>84145432
I read the article, My first response repeated its point to you

>>84145363
>Skeptical Science is a non-profit science education organisation, run by a global team of volunteers.
This is not a credible source of info and the data in question does not even support your retarded point.

>>84145406
>it's only 16 billion in domestic sales and a trillion in international sales!
>it isn't a powerful lobby reeee!

>>84145363
Buddy, what even is your argument? That you want to be taken seriously as a science skeptic? That despite the overwhelming data that doesn't support your arguments, we have to entertain deniers? Why? Your info is wrong, it keeps getting proven wrong...why do you keep peddling it then? You come off as someone just parroting denial bullshit for a narrative.

Fuck off already.

>>84145450
Who gives a shit if coal is slightly cheaper when so is solar and wind, when coal is dying, when there is no longer a sustainable market for coal?

>>84145480
check the source it is using, dingus. unless research papers are also not trustworthy

>>84145396
Coal isn't a natural gas, buddy. I was hoping you would pick up on that.

>>84145577
Nigga read the first posts, my argument is only that the solution to climate change is still a debated topic

>>84145737
Again, it has virtually nothing to do with your point on developing nations...

>>84145577
>Don't bother to read sources
>get mad and say others deny science
pottery

>>84145772
The problem is that it's literally not a fucking debate outside of conservative lobbyists and the GOP.

Literally the entire fucking first world has agreed on what to do, except some retards in the US. Do you understand the frustration here? Do you understand how you are probably doing the wrong people a favor here?

>>84145779
My point is that nations switch to other options when they become more economical, which green energy is doing. My natural gas reference is an example of the US doing exactly that, and the benefits it has provided to reduces emissions

>>84145862
But that wasn't your original point.

>>84145815
Your source was on reduced carbon emissions and fracking, from a nonprofit website run by climate change "skeptics".