Why are sequels always shit?
>>84075884
>Why are sequels always shit?
Because the director doesn't follow the rules. That were established the first time round.
>>84075940
I always thought it was because executives want to grab cash once the original movie does well, so they rush everything to make a quick buck and be done with it.
>>84075884
>always
>posts a pic of a franchise where one of the sequels is considered as good if not better than the first
Terminator 2 is infinitely better though.