Why is this considered "high art"?

>>84057707
Because of the butthole open and close pucker sequence.

>>84057707
because it helps destroy civilization, goy

>>84057707
Stick to capeshit, kid.

>that critic quote
top lel I love Waters

John Waters was talking about Devine and said that he ate real dog shit, and he did it in one take, everyone behind the camera was vomiting.

>>84057707
Depends on how you define "art.". Did you laugh? Cringe? Wince? Puke? Or did you feel absolutely nothing as you watched it? Art's in the eye of the beholder. If a film arouses feelings in you, whatever those feelings might be, then you walk away from it just a little different than you were before you saw it. That's the goal of every filmmaker, to get you to feel--to make it so you can't get the experience out of your head for awhile. Ever see a movie and then forget you saw it? It made no impression on you whatsoever? I don't know how you feel, but to me, that's the true definition of artlessness--when the work has forged no bond between you and it. When you don't even feel any hostility towards it. When it's just blah.

File: They bought it.gif (436KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 640x360px

>>84059173

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2YVRu09nAo

Divine was /ourgal/

File: giphy_s.gif (67KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 380x380px

>watched Female Troubles once
>literally felt dirty and a bit demented afterwards