N O T G U I L T Y

hey
HEY
HEEEEY

gulty of not giving a FUCK

Did nothing wrong. Those harlets wanted the Croscock

>>84056218
P O U N D C A K E
O
U
N
D
C
A
K
E

>>84056218
Not exactly.

Mistrial, there's a difference.

>>84056301
a bad court thingy?

>>84056301
No there isn't.

>>84056218
They'll make sure to fill the jury with young female feminists next time. They will make sure Cosby goes down, even if he's innocent.

>>84056323
why would there not be a difference

seems like there's a difference to me

>>84056323
Yes, there is.

It's a suspension of the trial due to lack of evidence or procedural failings, such as the crimes taking place 30 fucking prior, not an absolution of the accused's suspected guilt.

For him though, the results are pretty much the same, he's walking.

File: 1JBmi5.gif (3MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x225px

H E Y
E E
Y Y

BASED

LIBERALS BTFO

File: IMG_8524.jpg (23KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 470x313px

>>84056342
>tfw be the only man in a jury full of feminists in a rape trial deadlocked in a hotel together.
>they all pound your head continuously trying to get you to vote guilty but you're the lone dissenting voice meaning he gets off free

>>84056396
> there's a difference
> for him though, the results are pretty much the same

he's not guilty. what part of that don't you understand

>>84056491
>celebrating a rapist getting off just to spite liberals

You disgust me more than liberals do.

File: 1475093980119.gif (890KB, 305x320px) Image search: [Google]

890KB, 305x320px

>rapist niggers dont even see jail time
Sweden tier

>>84056323
If he were found not guilty, the double jeopardy protections would kick in and he couldn't be tried for these allegations again.

With a mistrial, the prosecution has the option to try him again, as they've indicated they will.

>>84056396
>innocent until proven guilty
>not proven guilty
>still innocent
>therefore not guilty

THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN

>>84056323
A mistrial means that he can be retried in the future. Not guilty would mean that he would not be retried due to double jeopardy.

>>84056511
No I don't support a rapist I just oppose feminazis who want to change the law so that rape is defined as however they feel it and want to make it a man can be locked up for life without any evidence just because a woman said so.

File: cosby-blind-1488397583.jpg (37KB, 620x417px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 620x417px

>>84056544
>>rapist niggers dont even see jail time
Even if he was found guilty he wouldn't see jail time

File: 1386466131993.png (161KB, 669x669px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 669x669px

>>84056499
>being locked in a room with 11 man-hating harpies not wanting to examine the evidence and testimonies rationally

Oh god, I can only imagine what hell that would be.

a rapist nigger who'll wear that reputation forever, albeit forever won't be long because he'll be dead sooner rather than later

what a victory, spending the rest of his miserable life in blind darkness

File: elCostanza.jpg (23KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 250x250px

>>84056572
>innocent until proven guilty

>>84056623
If your based enough, it would be hillarious to troll them on a daily bases.

Only nu-male cucks would offer to cut off their balls if they were on the jury.

>>84056499
I'd watch that Twelve Angry Men remake.

>>84056301

/tv/ is retarded don't bother explaining it to them

>>84056755
>11 Triggered Cunts

>>84056598
It's clear that he's guilty. You don't have 30+ women coming forward, all telling similar stories that they couldn't have heard elsewhere, without it being true.

File: IMG_0113.jpg (27KB, 229x221px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 229x221px

>>84056240

>>84056721
>the cornerstone of a fair justice system
Yes, costanza man.

>>84056218
>nigger
>not guilty

>>84056511
Good. I want you to feel as disgusted as humanly possible. Then feel even more disgusted. It makes me feel good.

>>84056805
Except the media publicized their stories, so all they had to do was read a newspaper.

>>84056582
They're not going to retry him. They wasted their one chance.

>>84056839
Cosby is an honorary white.

>>84056623
>not basking in their impotent rage as they shriek and shriek at you while knowing there is nothing they can do to change your non guilty verdict except just get angrier

>>84056470
That's cool how the ball drops into the drink and it actually splashes

File: k.jpg (61KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 306x306px

>>84056218

>its a /tv/ and /pol/ defends a rapist episode

>>84056916
A nigger rapist

>>84056805
>sleep with Cosby years ago
>see some women is suing him for rape
>decide to cash in

That's all it is. Girls that wanted to get fucked then, realized that they were just playthings and trying to get their revenge now for a payday.

>>84056805
>nobody has ever falsified an accusation before for profit
>nobody has ever conspired with other people to frame someone before

I don't care if he is guilty, as long as there is no physical evidence and enough room for reasonable doubt, he should walk free. That is the cornerstone of any free justice system.

SJWs want to make it you can be locked up for an imaginary crime based on accusation alone.

>>84056916
>want to let feminists create a guilty until proven innocent system for all males just because he's black

>>84056955
Yeah, because they're making bank off this whole thing

Look at how broken brained you are.

If he was really a rapist than show me ONE(1) SHRED of evidence.

>>84056916
>rapist
[citation needed]

If he really was at least one of them would have come forth sooner.

>>84056916
Prove he's a rapist.
I'll wait.

>>84056623
Dude id love to sit in a room and just shit on their opinions and create a hung jury just out of spite.

Not only that but id be paid by the government to do that.

>>84056721
dumb ass

>>84056218
What's his name again?

>>84056916
yeah a rapist

oh wait. HE'S BEEN FOUND INNOCENT

you're more of a rapist than Cos

>>84057292
>FOUND INNOCENT

>>84057292
>hung jury
>found innocent

Do we have to go over the difference between a mistrial and an acquittal, again?

>>84056322
that's why you're the judge and I'm the law.. talkin' guy

>>84057088
He admitted under oath that he stocked up on drugs to roofie women with but, oh, sure, he totally never actually did it, he just ended up not bothering and giving those drugs away

>>84057292
A mistrial is not in any way a finding of innocence

>>84056916
>its a /tv/ and /pol/ defends a BLACK rapist episode

>>84056805
>It's clear that he's guilty.
Please present evidence of his guilt.

>>84056881
>They're not going to retry him.
Because...?

>>84057345
>He admitted under oath that he stocked up on drugs to roofie women with but, oh, sure, he totally never actually did it, he just ended up not bothering and giving those drugs away
So thought crime is illegal now? Fuck off, if someone thinks about robbing a store and then decides not to do it that you can't arrest them for thinking about robbing a store.

>>84056891
Do you think they would tie you down and stomp on your dick haha just curious

>>84057403
wasted too much time and money already on it and they fucked up

1000% INNOCENT

SUCK IT HATERZ

>>84057451
>american lawyers
>caring if they waste too much time and money

BASED BILL

>>84057101
>id be paid by the government to do that.
You know jury duty payments are a fucking pittance right anon? Like maybe $10-20 a day, assuming you even get picked for an actual case that goes on for a while. Jury duty blows.

>>84056301
>Mistrial, there's a difference.

not in this case. He's 79 , and will be dead before they can re-try him.

>>84057415
>So thought crime is illegal now?
Getting the drugs after planning the whole thing is hardly a thought cri e, closeted bootlicker.

Do defend a black rapist, I'm sure it does wonders for your mental health.

>>84056916
>>84057355
>I have no proof but trust me he raped them!

>>84056916
>500 women all have the same story and will all be filing civil suits for millions of dollars using the same lawyers

>all the "rape" drugs were highly sought after and expensive recreational drugs

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

>>84056817
Yet he's already guilty in the public's eyes.

>>84057564
Source that he raped someone? Oh wait you have none.

>>84057493
lawyers don't, but the DA does

File: You got running right back to white but than get you get Murdered by a butthurt Black who took the Once you Go Black meme serusly.jpg (646KB, 1094x1462px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 1094x1462px

>>84056218
>N O T ... G U I L T Y
Have we gone back in time to the 90s?

>>84056301>>84056396>>84056582
>>84056721
>>84056764
Hes not guilty until proven guilty, so the OP was in fact correct

>>84056218
I refuse to believe he raped or forced anyone into his bedroom. He persuaded them with money and fame and now years later they want to cash in on him before he dies. Fuck them.

>>84057638
innocent and not guilty don't mean the same thing

I bet you people thought MJ was guilty too cause he had multiple people claiming cases against him and in the end they admitted they had made shit up for the money.

>>84057564
Where's the law that planning to roofie someone and buying drugs for it then never doing it is illegal? Brainlet.

>>84056218
Just for one night I love niggers
Based pudding man

>>84057345
>buying drugs means youre guilty of drugging people
>buying a gun means youre guilty of shooting people

>>84057674
If anything MJ protected the kids from the Hollywood pedophiles. They killed him because he was about to blow the whistle on the Hollywood slavery ring.

Did his dick fit in the pusy? Because if that dick did not fit in that pusy there is no way my client raped those women. I rest my case

>>84056916
prove he is a rapist

go on I'll wait

He probably did do it the fucking nigger. Too bad the justice system completely fucked their chance, again.

>>84057564
>Do defend a black rapist
I love how /pol/ always emphasize him being black like it matters, as if they wouldn't care if it was a white man allegedly raping.

File: 255902808627216384.png (8KB, 112x112px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 112x112px

>women accuse him of being a rapist 30 years later instead of accusing him on the day it happened

Of course hes not guilty.

Who the fuck would ever be guilty of stupid shit like that?

>>84057791
/pol/ here
If he were white I'd probably think he'd guilty because of the relative rarity of rape cases.

but he's black, and the women didn't say shit for 30 years. Under these exceptional circumstances this common event (nigger rape) probably didn't happen.

the main is plainly innocent

Yeezy was right as always. Mah nigga Bill innocent, man why these fuckin White old ladies suddenly come out the woodwork screaming and shit "I-I WAS RAPED BILL DUN GAVE ME THE PUDDIN POP." No one wants your pasty white ass get the fuck outta here

>>84057674
>had a secret room filled with images and paintings of naked children, as well as boy dolls

MJ's case was a bit different. He gave reason for others to suspect him.

>>84056322
It all depends.

Mistrial basically means the jury could not come to a decision about the charges Cosby was facing. US law says all 12 juries have to agree if someone is guilty or not guilty.

Mistrials are a double edged sword legally.

You are not 100% vindicated if you get a mistrial. It simply means the jury could not agree if you are guilty or innocent. So you don't get vindicated and legally declared innocent of whatever it is you are accused of.

More so, a prosecutor who's case ends in a mistrial, can simply file the same charges all over again. Meaning a brand new trial, which can be bad for some folks (especially rich folk who use up all of their money for lawyers in the first trial and can't pay their high priced lawyer to represent them for the second trial).

Often times, prosecutors use the threat of a re-trial to force defendants to take a plea bargain. Especially if they know the defendant doesn't have the money to get a competent/really good lawyer the second time around, unless the lawyer is working pro bono.

HOWEVER, especially in high profile cases like Cosby's trial, there is the notion that the DA's office might decide to let the defendant go free and order their prosecutors not to refile the charges for a second trial. This is done if the jury deadlock is decidedly in the defendant's favor (meaning that retrying Cosby would be fruitless in terms of people just not buying the evidence) or if the case is too much of a PR nightmare to keep going and going.

There's not even one non-ignorant post in this entire thread. Including mine.

>>84057592
and so was zimmerman but that doesnt change the proven fact that lil tray tray attacked him

>>84056499

> Be only man in all female jury
> Women are feminists
> Tell the other jurors that he will vote guilty if they all give him blowjobs

How far will these women defend their feminist ideologies?

>>84058025
>some wannabe cop racial-profiling you, refusing to leave you alone even after you tell him to stop

Zimmerman was asking for it.

>>84057798
He was famous then.

>>84057753
There was no proof.

That's how the justice system works, dummy.

>>84058100
More importantly, sleeping with women you're doing recreational drugs with wasn't considered rape then. They had nothing to gain by claiming rape then.

>>84058100
Why does that matter? Even if he walked away it showed that there was an attempt

>>84056812
reddit

>>84056499
literally unable to happen, if you ever been in jury selection a good way to get out of it is sperg out in the courtroom with hippie bullshit.

a feminist would not make it past selection because all one of the lawyers has to do is stand up and say "there are only two genders", those who sperg out gets dismissed

>>84058138
>no proof
correct, but there was evidence. People get off all the time due to poorly handled cases, obtaining evidence incorrectly, not just because there was no proof.

>>84058261
another good way is to use your offhand to fill out the form, keep your head down and write down video games and cats as your hobbys

>>84056499
They won't let you on a jury if you're biased about it

Let's be honest. These women went into the room knowing full well that drugs and sex would happen. They wanted his rich penis just as much as he wanted to fuck them.

its completely deplorable what happened but to criminalize a man who was doing what was the norm in the 80's is ludicrous, like literally move snitch get out the way, it reeks of gold diggin

>>84058303
And you think you have more authority over the matter then the law?
Lol fuck off. Innocent, he didn't do shit.

>>84057941
>>84057551
prosecutors already rescheduled the trial for October btw so Cosby is still on trial

>>84058535
Doesn't matter, they literally can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Cosby raped women who willingly came to him for drugs and sex.

They will have to keep retrying until they get the dumbest jury in existence if they want a guilty verdict.

>>84058096
tray tray attacked him because he thought he was a homosexual stalking him

>>84058086
They would have you bounced from the jury and arrested for attempted bribery, since you technically are demanding a bribe for your vote.

>>84056805

m8 humanity will die out if every guy has to worry about going to jail because a woman he fucked 30 years ago woke up one day and decided it was rape.

>>84058430
This is a criminal trial, which means that these women don't get any money off it.

>>84060683
> this goy
success in a criminal trial just means the floodgates open for civil suits

>>84060683
why not? Can't be awarded damages

>>84056544
more like
>lying roasties get btfo on crying false rape

>>84060744
*can't they

>>84060724
One expensive mistrial and being old af rapidly closes those floodgates. We'd know if they really wanted to milk it because they'd constantly be on talk shows and shit for those paychecks.

>>84060744
My legal knowledge is fairly rusty, but not really. Their best bet to get money out of him before he goes broke fighting two trials or dies is a class action lawsuit, because I don't think a criminal trial would award any damages for rapes that occurred 30 years ago.

File: cozby_bitch.png (240KB, 532x398px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 532x398px

>>84056301
>when it's a mistrial

>>84060724
Didn't the plaintiff in this case already settle in a civil suit a long time ago?

File: cleaning up.gif (2MB, 450x254px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x254px

>janitors trying to remove retarded /pol/ trash from this board

>>84058741
Or just not get any stubborn blekks.

>>84058303
Dude they didn't even have enough to try him in criminal court- there was only one accusation that was tried and it was a civil suit. The accuser was on the stand for hours giving testimony and the jurors were not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr Cosby had raped that woman.

That isn't a mishandling of evidence or any other OJ-like scenario that people would like to attribute to this case. Simply put there is not enough evidence to convict this man. If you still consider him a rapist then you aren't looking at the situation objectively, as in shut the fuck up and come back when you have a real rape, like the rape of Nanking or something.

>>84056396
>For him though, the results are pretty much the same, he's walking.

Except for the part where his name will be forever tarnished because of the accusations, yeah.

>>84056218
It doesn't matter even if he was truly innocent his reputation and legacy is ruined forever in eyes of 90% of normies.

He was one of very few based black guys who despised the modern welfare negro and his politically loaded answers probably earned him that rapist badge.

Did nothing wrong. Fuck bitches get money.

Isn't there a statute of limitations on this stuff anyway?

>>84056218

Good.

those bitches wanted $$$$

>>84062270
exactly how will they profit from a criminal lawsuit?

>>84062347
my bad, case, it isn't a lawsuit at all.

>>84062347
>>84062395
When criminal cases are determined and if the person is found guilty, or if they settle, that opens them up to civil cases. Most of which they will also settle, or risk yet another media rape.

However, in this case, it seems that he's doing okay. So, the alleged victims are fucked. Pun intended.

>>84062707
This last case is a mistrial. If he gets another then most likely he'll be broke, and closer to death. If these woman wanted money they'd be milking TVs shows and being insufferable. I'm sure a one or two of the woman are just in it for attention but there's no way 30+ woman want to be on the receiving end of all that hate for a dubious payoff, because if the civil suits ever go through Cosby will be probably be dead.

>>84058361
I put my loser self in and still got picked. Fuck that should have sperged all crazy.

>>84056218
Doesn't really matter his public reputation is still absolutely destroyed. Being falsely accused of rape is one of the most terrifying things ever because even if you prove without a doubt you're innocent the media coverage and just general stigma of ever doubting the accuser will ruin any chance you have of getting your life back to normal.

File: 20170515_104161.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>84062707
>>84062825
He probably won't be dead, because as far as cases go this one actually hit the courts pretty quickly. However, let's assume you're right and he does die. Guess what?

You. Can. Sue. His. Estate.

Trust funds he set up? Gone.
Accounts for his family/kids? Gone.
Investments? Gone.
Land/real estate? Gone.

Also, in most civil cases, if the alleged wins, they don't even need to pay out of pocket for lawyer fees. The attorney, knowing the payoff is imminent, will work for free until their % from the settlement arrives. So it's a win-win for everybody (except the Cosby estate).

I don't even think he did half the acts he's accused, nor do I think he did any of the ones he's been formally charged with; people regret partying and fucking all the time, but Cosby is famous and old and has money ($300m net worth iirc [yes, I know net worth doesn't mean they'll receive that much money in damages, but it does show he has a enough of a rich estate to liquidate and get a decent payoff for those involved]) -- Add in the latest feminism trends and you have the case we're discussing.

The American legal system is wonderful, it really is one of the best in the world. Except for half the 9th circuit is cucked to hell and back with modern liberalism disease, but beyond that Cosby is availing himself of the very same system that gives ex-wives half your money (even with a pre-nup, which are basically meaningless nowadays).

Sorry for rant at end, but final year of law school coming up so I get interested in these "pop"-justice cases sometimes.

>>84063054
you know more about this then me, if he gives his kids millions of dollars and a house each, which he probably has already done, can they take that away? All the suits would do is deprive his rich kids of few more million, and if they managed to not do anything smart with the money they're just retarded.

The american legal system is also wonderful because it makes Bill Cosby virtually unassailable at the height of his popularity, ensuring that any potential cases against him had to wait until he was old and uncool (which cuts both ways, I know).

>>84063611
Depends on a few factors:
1. Are the damages determined by an out-of-court agreement? (Did the two parties/mediator come together and hash out a $X to settle) -- Most out of court settlements are lower than what a court would decide, BUT that is not /always/ true. Last term I actually wrote an opinion paper on a minority case wherein it was obvious (though not verifiable) that the plaintiff had blackmailed the defendant into settling out of court, the amount was exorbitant as fuck [want to make it clear blackmail is not the only factor going into potential Larger OOC Settlements]) It was a fucky situation, but so is most of practiced law.

2. Cosby/his estate would likely want to keep his "family" intact by selling out "his" stuff first before tapping into his family's (I don't know his family's trappings or anything, so I lack the knowledge to go into detail)

3. I know he's a producer in film and in music, and likely has some royalties. There have been a few cases I've read where a (reasonably) rich person, instead of losing their real estate/bank accounts/cash on hand, instead signed their royalties over -- Sort of like, would you take a Lump Sum vs. Trickle Sum (if you plan to invest, Lump Sums are usually smarter choice [otherwise Trickle Sum])

4. How many of the people that accused him will be involved in the case. If it's only the few people then it's less likely he'll pay a higher amount (even if the media claims OVER 9000 women were raped, all that matters in court's decisions [or should matter if the judge is truly impartial {kek}] are the women actually alleging the rapes)

Yeah, it's wild how fame, the media, popularity, and the like are as equally important as precedent and evidence. Even if he had been accused at his popularity height by two dozen women, he'd have likely settled out of court -- and actually, this may have already happened if no formal charges were ever rendered-- which closes the door on further action.

>>84063611
>>84063935
But yeah, in a lot of cases, people will lose everything. Not so much super famous people like Bill Cosby, and with the way the wind is blowing it doesn't seem as if his luck will change. There hasn't been any "shocking developments", his behaviour (yelling HEY, HEY, HEY while walking out) lends itself to him not being too stressed, and the media is basically dead-ended with their opinions -- There's no "continuation" on the Cosby case, no deathknell being rang beyond "Oh, a mistrial, how terrible for women everywhere."

All in all, he seems fine. My belief is that he'll skate pretty well off, he might counter-sue for libel? But if I were his lawyer (which is, not to say I think I'd be a good one in his defense) I wouldn't push him to counter sue. Getting off is great. Keeping the media churning trying to save his reputation would be what would kill him. At that point /something/ would come out that'd sink him.

>>84056301
he was NOT found guilty

>>84057592
This, he's ruined his whole career and reset the societal evolution of the negro.

>>84063611
>>84063935
>>84064001
To actually answer your question without an essay: If the houses were paid by his money, yes, they could/would take them.

If the kids/family were given seed money (a small loan of a million dollars, for example) and they turned that money into their own significant net worth, then their own earned net worth wouldn't be touched. However, the initial loan (and in some jurisdictions, interest on said loan) could be taken out of their earned net worth.

Again, it all depends on the actual $X damages. Which, at this point, seems in Bill's favor.

File: DCdHSgqW0AAjMA2.jpg (515KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 2048x2048px

What are people like this thinking? How can they know he's innocent?

>>84063935
>>84064001
wtf I just had a non retarded argument on /tv/. I still disagree that he didn't rape people, because unless I'm mistaken, this case wasn't started by a random woman but by people who knew those woman, who were famous that spoke out. It just doesn't have the symptoms of a fake sexual harassment. And unless he resigns himself to total isolation, he will be feeling the repercussions for the rest of his life.

>>84064182
>Niggers
>Thinking

Pick one.

File: 1497841313270.jpg (47KB, 511x711px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 511x711px

>>84057941
Great explanation, here's a thank you waifu

File: Rothybaby.jpg (54KB, 900x450px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 900x450px

>>84057592
>>84064159
Even without a court case being accused of something destroys a reputation.

"Get accused of fucking a goat and even if the goat denies it, your tombstone reads as Charlie the Goatfucker."

When it comes to an elderly, rich man that isn't exactly pursuing a further career, his reputation isn't all that important. Yes, a man's reputation is always important, but he's been hermitic for years at this point living off his legacy. Given he's also a black man and has likely lived through prejudices, bigotry, racism, low and high lobbed insults, memes about him being a pedophile/puddin pops, I think he'll be okay.

Assuming the case keeps going his way, which seems likely.

>>84064206
Admittedly I haven't slept in a long time and haven't looked over my autistic notes I take on cases I read in the news but now that you've mentioned I think you're right about it being a proxy-allegation.

Yeah, his reputation is fucked, see>>84064257
for my bullshit shpeal about that. It was fucked the moment more than one person made a mention of any act. Such is the way of life, especially in the Information Age. Crowd-sourced mobs on social media thinking they're champions of justice will masturbate themselves into a tizzy-dizzy until the day he dies, and then for weeks afterward he'll be memed into his grave about "Remember how that rapist got off scot-free? At least the patriarchy died today.

PS: proxy allegations tend to have less of an impact on decisions by judges, except in cases of, say, corruption, or in cases of people who have gotten off before due to witness recants (especially if believed to be through intimidation).

>>84064257
>When it comes to an elderly, rich man that isn't exactly pursuing a further career

It's more damaging to the negro hive-mind because Cosby was the original 'white-man's nigger'. He was an aspirational standard for niggers to look up to and a talisman for white people to more accommodatig of them.

>Look, those blacks can be just as normal and well adjusted as us, with their nice house and wholesome family values.

Turns out he's a drug pushing rapist like most niggers. Whodda thunk it?

>>84057941
I thought they can't go to trial again because the statute of limitations is up. It wasn't in 2015 when the first trial started, but it is now?

>>84064182
>How can they know he's innocent?

Liberals constantly told them that any crime committed by a black man is the fault of the crackers/conservatives.

>>84057345
Wasn't he roofying them with 'ludes? As in a recreational drug? e could've just said that they were for personal use.

>>84064424
That makes sense, -- was he an active member of the black community? Beyond his media (television, music involving black people), was he still a regular at certain "black" neighborhoods and restaurants?

Did he donate money to their community?

I ask, because I don't know much of that side of his fame. An example as to why I ask: Rappers like Lil Wayne and Chance the Rapper are considered by New Orleans and Chicago (respectively) as great black people. Wayne and Chance donate to their communities, push agendas meant to further some of those communities. Black people do look up to "better"/rich black people, of course they do, but there's also a lot of them that would consider him to be an Uncle Tom (despite the irony of Uncle Tom being a gold standard of a gentleman and shouldn't be used as an insult) for forgetting who he was.

>>84057941
>one random guy from town in the jury gets to decide the fate of a murderer

American """""""""""""""""""""justice""""""""""""""""""""

>>84056544
Bill Cosby is an innocent nigger you roastie cunt!

>>84057345
>not in any way a finding of innocence
You know the phrase "Innocent until proven guilty"?
You know what? This country is dead, the Constitution is dead. The Founders are rolling in their graves. It's time for an autocrat to purge this pathetic husk of a nation

How many women actually went on record in court?

>>84064643
oh shut up you hysterical cunt, you can't even comprehend the other guy's post. fucking moron.

>guy named bill
>accused of rape multiple times
>never convicted

Clinton or Cosby?

>>84064867
what is it with Bills?

>>84061972
His "legacy" is shit anyway. The Cosby Show is one of the worst sitcoms of all time.

File: 1486192204270.jpg (426KB, 632x810px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 632x810px

>>84056470
NOW I DO WHAT I WANT

>>84064528
You can request a bench trial

>>84065367
I DID IT
NOW I DO WHAT I WANT

hannibal burress blown the fuck out!

File: 74dc3790cc7dfee5a4367b4b35f32e77.jpg (207KB, 2000x1329px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 2000x1329px

>>84056218

>A wealthy Black man gets off because he's popular even though he's guilty as fuck

Persecution my ass!

Bill Cosby raped my mom's best friend's mom in 1982.

>>84057345
This grossly oversimplifies the point.

Personally, I do think Cosby did rape at least some of the women (not all, but some), but what he testified to was that women had requested by buy quaaludes and other party pills for them, which he did. A number of them then testified that they had indeed requested he buy them for him, and they took them voluntarily.

It's kinda shitty and illegal, but not rapey. He was doing it during the 70's, when everyone was taking drugs recreationally if they were part of a certain crowd that Cosby and the women involved were definitely a part of.

That's partially what clouded the waters at the trial: many of the women admitted to taking roofies, quaaludes, LSD, cocaine, and other fun drugs voluntarily at other times, sometimes even from Cosby. The prosecution had a really tough time selling that Constand didn't want the pills that time, because she was known for asking Cosby for drugs frequently with sexual gratification in mind. How can you tell the difference between someone asking to be drugged and sexed and someone getting drugged and sexed without wanting to when it's the same person with the same drug getting the drug and the sex from the same person? That's a damn hard case to argue without some reasonable doubt--which is all the defense has to prove: that there is reasonable doubt that Cosby did not rape her.

>>84057345
party drugs and roofies are not the same thing.

>>84057030
Book deals, movie deals, public fame for being 'brave' it's all it takes.

File: 9327523749.jpg (69KB, 950x750px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 950x750px

>its a dangerous criminal is simply released into society episode

File: 1497864014829.gif (1MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x300px

>MJ, Cosby and OJ
>All free and not guilty
>Libtards still call them rapists and murderer

>Trump free of all charges that would link him to any sort of russian ties with the election
>Colbert and libcucks still push the agenda that he's a russhill

>>84064424
>lol nigger

it's so easy to spot the retarded /pol/ opinions and disregard them

>>84057941

>legally declared innocent

Thats now how it works.

Just because youre declared "not guilty" doesnt mean youre "innocent".

That being said. Cosby essentially won, but wont get damages from the woman who smeared him.

>>84064250
That's a man (female)

>>84065527
OJ got off because the state blundered the case, including having racial remarks leaked and mishandling of evidence showing both bias and incompetence. Plus high priced lawyers.

>>84065705
I can't speak for US law, but here in Norway, if you fuck a woman who is "not of sound mind" because she got drunk or high herself, you're in the clear. If you get a woman high or drunk, then fuck her, you can get in trouble. It gets a little murky beacuse for it to be rape thye need to prove you got her drunk/high with the INTENTION of raping her, which is kind of hard to prove since, unless you are a complete moron and write a blog with your plans, you just have to deny it.

>>84056916
>muslims and blacks rape women on a daily basis because liberals think we need tons of these ((people)) in our society
"Well it's not their fault really the white male patriarchy made them do it and there's really no evidence they even did it so....
>black comedian is accused of rape by a cabal of women who can't provide any solid evidence and took 30 years to speak up
"Yeah he totally did it what a piece of shit i mean he's basically a white male now"

>>84067393
>disregard
>by being a (You) slut
lmao

>tfw too ugly, unlikable, and poor to get away with rape

IT'S NOT FUCKING FAIR