So /tv/, overall I think he is a pretty decent critic, but I had heard you had an issue with Confused Matthew, often equating him to DarkSidePhill or Tom Preston? If so, what is it?
As far as I know, he
>Never ever ever closed any of his comments.
>Admitted faults when he had some(Like with Bipolar issues)
>Never fapped to anything weird
>Rationally and logically explained his issue with a film
>Agrees with the world 95% of the time anyway (For ex. People bitched at him for his Batman Returns review, but never gave BennetTheSage shit for his.)
>Never insulted or directly attacked his dissenters
>Has a consistent viewpoint that does not contradict, and is true to his feelings.
>Does not have an ED page.
Now he has faults, and I'll list the ones I see.
>Evolving opinions with short term memory (His Lion King film review has him say "This is the one part I liked" three times. He should have been aware that and said "There are exactly three parts in this film I like". He once said "Lucky Star was the only anime I ever liked" and now says "Death Note is the only anime I ever liked."
>Bipolar
>Possible girlfriend issues (When Baffled Beth was with him, he like Avatar and Scott Pilgrim. Now that he is no longer with her, he does not like the films)
>>84056114
t. Matthew
I was going to post his No Country for Old Men and 2001 reviews as evidence of your hopeless plebiness, but I can't find them. Did you remove them from the internet because you admit they were horrible?