Is there ONE poster without Iron Man or the Avengers?
>>84053395
here you go, champ
>>84053395
If they paid him to be in the movie, why would they not advertise RDJ?
move on next question
>>84054576
nope, at the bottom center of the shot beside the wooden base of the sign you can see the avenger's tower
try again, scrub
>>84054644
oh sorry, there's a building you can barely see that says that it's the avengers
you can't even see the building in the freabkin thumbnail
it count's
>>84054732
>the optimal viewing experience for a poster is via the thumbnail
negative, boss. i expected better. imagine how visible it would be in its native resolution rather than that pixellated mess you saved
>>84054798
generally if something in a poster is important they're gonna want it to be readable from far away, yeah
that building is in a few more posters- like the one here- but much closer to the screen, and with the giant A clearly visible as in "hey, this is the avengers tower, you can tell cause there's an A there for Avengers"
for this one you have to be looking pretty closely at the skyline to see the tower, and even then you have to recognize it from its shape- the A isn't even visible
it's a nice nod to anyone paying close enough attention, and it's a reflection of how the new york city skyline looks in the marvel movies, but someone walking by the poster wouldn't know there's an avengers connection, unlike the others
>>84053395
no there isn't, they want you to know it's MCU