Question about Harry Potter

>>84020563
Voldemort was immune to all magic except for his own, or something like that

>>84020630
you just made them up didnt you?

Dullest

File: 1497754313243.jpg (512KB, 1620x2884px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1620x2884px

Because he was a masochist cuckold that watched over his ex-childhood love's husband's son and he also starred in easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>84020563
it's harry potter if you don't want to turn off your brain then don't read kids books
jesus christ are people still trying to take it apart? It is a fucking chapter book about magic for kids and teens

>>84020630
That's Agahnim.

>>84020799
>Because he was a masochist cuckold that watched over his ex-childhood love's husband's son

kek

>>84020563
Magic has lots of failsafes innovated, dark magic even more so.

Voldemort could Apparate away at will. Apparition can't be traced and can't be stopped unless you set it up ahead of time like the wards over Hogwarts. If they somehow did manage to anchor him there (which doesn't exist as far as I know), he can Dark Mark Snape's forearm after immobilizing him, to summon fanatic Death Eaters to defend him.

No one mentioned the Horcruxes, and no one is arguing that having Voldemort's body destroyed would be helpful, you faggot

dude why don't they use guns???