is there a conspiracy in hollywood to solely make big budget

>>83991585
Conspiracy implies ill-intent, so no.
Is there an active plan to cater to chink audiences? Obviously.

Yes. Next question?

>>83991585
>americans now think hollywood caters specifically to the chinese market in order to delude themselves out of thinking that they aren't the biggest nation of plebs on the planet

wew

>>83991585

yes like transformers

better question is why do the chinks love it? I thought they were suppose to be smart

>>83991627
>Conspiracy implies ill-intent, so no.
apparently making movies shit doesn't count as something that is bad

Actually these movies are used to transfer money
Cali is dying and everyone is moving to austin
stuff like ghost in the shell, pirates 5, etc are jewish accountant tricks

>>83991739
Honestly, this is the only logical explanation.

I find it impossible to believe that the only halfway intelligent entertainment execs all happen to work for streaming services (Netflix, Amazon, Hulu). And it's worth noting that they still know how to make....watchable Oscarbait.

So, the clearest explanation is that they're tanking on purpose.

>>83991627
No, ill-intent may be common among conspirators, but not necessary. Just secrecy, which may be adopted out of efficiency, necessity or chance.

>>83991693
Maybe seeing big robots makes them forget about their small penises and diminutive bodies

>>83991693
They allow 20 or so foreign films a year. Might as well get the big name ones in.

Also yes Hollywood is losing a like 25% of their shit every year so they HAVE to make money in China.

>>83991693
Chinks are math smart. They are drones and have no emotional intelligence. They don't know what art is.

>>83991682
Hate to break the news, but the Chinese are bigger plebs and tackier than Americans. Communist revolution destroyed whatever taste they once had. They love Hollywood's blockbuster.