Is it true westerns were the capeshit of the 50s?
>>83970538
Whatevuh happened to... Gary Coopuh?
No because among the shit pile of the genre are some of the greatest films ever. Capeshit has never produced anything worth watching.
>>83970597
conan the barbarian you fag
>>83970538
Also the 40's
No because there are actually a lot of good westerns.
Some were
High noon is obviously not one of them
>>83970597
>>83972327
Just wait till Italians will start making capeshit on the cheap
>>83970624
Conan is adventure/fantasy, not superhero shit
>>83970538
Actually it was pirate movies
>>83970538
the wild west is a setting, not a formula.
>>83970538
No. There were more than five good westerns.
>some of the best movies ever are low budget Italian capeshit
Huh
>>83972377
It's too late
>>83974303
This
>>83974303
>spoof of cheesy 1970s Italian action movie rip offs
>never completed
>still better than any Avengers movie
>>83970538
No, because they are concerned with themes of masculinity.
>>83970538
no because some of them are actually great movies, the only comparison to be made between the two is the over saturation of the market.
>>83970538
Westerns and WWII movies
>>83972197
And, the 30s, the 20s, etc.
>>83972327
Well, there's like 100 times more w>>83972377
esterns than superhero films.
>>83972377
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qogxEfXL-ME
No, because "Western" is its own setting/genre. Westerns can have an abundance of different styled antagonist and protagonist, living in different decades, and dealing with different societal problems.
"Super-hero" is a subgenre of Action/Adventure.
>>83970538
are you serious?
If you compare how many westerns were made during that time vs how many capeshit films were made/are being made there's like a huge gap between those two. It makes the capeshit plague look like a common cold and westerns a spanish influenza
>>83973364
>american movies have big budgets
You fell for the money laundring jew