Harry Potter

>>83961490
what are you, 9?

Can you repeat the question?

CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION

>>83961490
obviously you dumb fuck it was stated multiple times that horcruxes are pieces of voldemorts soul and because harry has a piece of that soul he gained some of voldemorts powers like talking to snakes so when the soul was destroyed he lost all that shit you dumbass

No dumbass, the talking to snakes was supposed to tip you off to his real father: Professor Severus Snape.

File: mac daddy rank.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

Do you think she thanked him for getting her out of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83962213
STOP THIS

>>83961490
Harry Houdini is that what its modeled after?

>>83963142
"No!"

File: IMG_0098.png (33KB, 502x380px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 502x380px

>>83962095
Reminder that this is who a large amount of Harry Potter fans idolised.
They're not the sharpest tools in the box. Some might say they're the dullest, even

>>83962213
based

>>83964146
He's kind of right, starving yourself is not a very healthy way to lose weight.

>>83964146
>They're not the sharpest tool
SOMEBODY

File: 1911.jpg (80KB, 630x851px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 630x851px

Why don't muggles carry guns?

>>83966060
Because it's set in Britain.

>>83965484
Even ignoring the thesaurus syndrome, diet and exercise are quite literally the only reliable ways of permanently losing weight.
Even if the adipose cells remain, they do get depleted

The fact that he said he'd delete suggestions about diet and exercise show he was just using the usual fat logic that any restriction of calories is a needless starvation.

File: 1497009378415.png (267KB, 480x527px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 480x527px

>>83964146
>metabolic dispriviliged

File: IMG_0174.jpg (588KB, 1448x2740px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 1448x2740px

>>83966476
It's fatty language for "REEEEEEE, WHY CAN'T I SIT ON MY ASS AND EAT ALL DAY WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES?!?!?"

>>83966060
If most of the muggle world knew about the existence of wizards/witches and mobilized their military, they would be able to take them out fairly easily.

>>83961490
No because parseltongue is a trait that can be learned, as evidenced by Ron opening the Chamber of Secrets in the 7th book.