Is she the Audrey Hepburn of our generation?

>>83960475
Not even close.

>>83960475
Sure, if Audrey Hepburn was completely devoid of charisma.

File: big_6437b635f890314b178c2bf1fa5ff29585d65e99.jpg (974KB, 1719x1290px) Image search: [Google]

974KB, 1719x1290px

she's the hershlag of our generation

File: natalie-portman-premieres-natalie-portman-136160_1251_1920.jpg (297KB, 1022x1600px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1022x1600px

shes the jewess of our generation

File: Zoe.jpg (162KB, 719x1080px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 719x1080px

>>83960475
No.

is it because they were both smolls?

File: 1449345744167.png (347KB, 480x750px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 480x750px

No

>>83960964
I'd love to put my peepee in her shlag if you know what I mean

>>83960475
Audrey Hepburn was a fashion star who started a lot of new trends in clothing, that's why she's popular. Hershlag isn't that. I guess Lady Gaga is the closest we have to new Hepburn

>>83960964
This. Let her have her own lane.

>>83961359
ayyyy

>>83960995
>C H E S T L E T
>H
>E
>S
>T
>L
>E
>T

literally a disgrace for judaism. no wonder jews like jared kushner marry big titted aryans like ivanka trump.

>>83961735
Boobs are for gays

>>83961735
I love her jewbs. Size isn't everything.

There is no Audrey Hepburn of our generation. No one is as perfect INSIDE and out as her.