>batman v superman grosses 650 million in first 2 weeks >OMG!

>>83903869
The previous 2 solo Batman movies both made over a billion dollars each
The fact that BvS couldn't, even though it had Batman AND Superman AND Wonder Woman, is a pretty big sign of a failure
BvS also had twice the budget (300m) of WW (149m)

File: file.png (347KB, 1858x782px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 1858x782px

>>83903869
BvS was undoubtedly the better movies (if capeshit could ever be placed on a spectrum containing good).

But I made less profit. It wasn't a bomb, but for that kind of IP and publicity, it should have done Avenger numbers.

>>83903869
>>83904004

I just realized that for all the hype about >muh womyn heroine, WW made less than any of the Katnip movies.

Batman vs Superman was supposed to be Avengers-tier. It was supposed to be DC's masterpiece, the movie that elevated them up to Marvel's level. It didn't. It was a decent movie, certainly better than Avengers 2, but still, it failed to make that kind of cash.

>>83903973
>>83904004
>>83904081
>>83904004
So is the delineation "budget vs profit"? That's it, in essence?

Does that make Deadpool the most successful capeshit of all time?

>>83904174
Probably, yeah. It was probably the best capeshit too. Which isn't saying much, but meh, it's the only one I'd rather watch again.

(Batman solo is kino, not capeshit).

Didn't BvS have a marketing budget that cost as much as the actual film?

>>83904174
>Does that make Deadpool the most successful capeshit of all time?

It's the most successful R-rated movie of all time

I liked both of them so I don't really care.

>>83903869
It's because "Men make more money than women" so they're just doing the math.