Will there ever be anything like him ever again?
Of course!
Yes, time is cyclical and history is always repeating itself.
I hope not.
No. People don't develop personalities anymore.
>>83863821
Fat and unfunny? There are plenty of those people around, OP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_UUKwPWj80
>>83864231
Get out pleb.
That faggot aside. If I had to rank Farley he wasn't as good as Hartman.
>>83864289
Oh I'm not joking. He was the epitome of "fat, loud and unfunny Americunt." I'm just sad that he was given enough time to exercise his influence on several abhorrent films, as opposed to any other exercise, which he clearly did not do.
>>83863821
SNL has been circling the drain for years now but this is what finally killed it for me. Dredging up one of your dead former cast members most memorable characters for some dumbass shit like this is in really poor taste
>>83863797
John Candy was a million times funnier.
>>83864289
Are you a burger?
>>83864553
can't really compare the two. john candy was a creepy family man type and chris farley was the loveable village idiot. i kinda think jonah hill has a job because there was a void that chris farley left open.
>>83864731
I can compare them. John Candy was funnier. And they are both generally grouped together, with Farley imitating a lot of Candy's material that he developed at 2nd city. I like Farley's stuff but I don't think he was as legendary as people make him out to be. He was a funny guy, but not an all-time great or anything.
>>83864917
They both died doing schlocky comedies too. Farley as Shrek would have been way WAY better than mike myers. Franchise potential meant they needed to recast.