>Thankssssssssssssssss Why did the snake thank Harry here?

because arry freed him from the zoo you dip

>>83856170
Autism.

File: 1453656323224.jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

For helping him escape from one of the dullest franchises in history. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83856188
Are these books online somewhere? I wanna do a ctrl+f and search for "stretched"

because you can't do the hissing thing if you say "fuck you kid"

>>83856251
Some anon a long time ago already did once and debunked the pasta, it's something like a dozen times throughout the entire series and not even in the context of taking a walk. Pasta is funny and all but unfortunately lying.

>>83856331
It's a terrible franchise but serves a purpose as a pleb filter.
If someone goes for Potter when there's LOTR kino to enjoy instead, it says a lot about their character and tells you to avoid that person.

>>83856331
It's based on an actual review of the first book, which uses it 7 times. Rowling got a lot better.

>>83856400
>>83856408
Oh don't get me wrong, potter is shit and rowling is worse, but there's better examples the pasta could have used.

>>83856170
Why didn't Harry use his snake superpowers more often?

>>83856457
Because he realized it was associated with evil and thus deliberately avoided doing it. Before, he didn't even realize he wasn't speaking English.

>>83856188
>Ayn Rand
>Atlas Shrugged out of all the Rand books
>god tier

Don't you be talking shit about how dull something is.

>>83856483
whoa, so its like racism
harry learned to check his priviliege

>>83856492
How is there always always always some retard who chews up obvious bait