what did /tv/ think of this? i thought it was fucking excellent.

>>83831708
Beautifully shot, cool setting and premise, but it's way too long and the main twists are pretty obvious about halfway through. Also, about halfway through, Lockhart turns into a complete retard.

There was a lot of potential, but it just felt silly to me by the end. A solid 5/10

I haven't seen it but it looks beautiful, is it worth the watch even if it is shit? I'm a style over substance guy at times so I don't mind shit stories all the time

>>83833348
Fuck yeah, you'll probably love it if that's the case. I genuinely really enjoyed it, I don't get the hate for it.

plot was pretty mediocre but it was pretty to look at

>>83833781
Okay, thanks anon

>>83831708
beautiful film, intro has a nice message, but the story can be a bit stupid especially towards the end

So in the end is Lockhart becomes crazy, or he is just evil from the start?

>>83831708
3rd movie in a row I watched with awkwardly menstruating girl. Here is my streak:

1. The survivalist
2. Brimstone
3. A cure for wellness

I wonder what next movie will bring.

>>83835155
Kek I watched Brimstone and then A cure for Wellness. Is the survivalist any good?
Maybe Movie 43?

>>83835269
>Movie 43
kek

Jerked my gherkin to the nurse's dried up titties.

Too long and the premise is a bit tired and obvious.