muh ellipses
muh surrealism
muh hands
>muh tight framing
>muh dearth of horizontal motion within frame
>muh front-back motion
>muh composition at the expense of continuity
>muh tatami
muh "BBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!"
muh 'splosions
>muh Stones
>muh long takes with much camera movement
>muh bokem
>muh crying
>muh austerity
>>83818261
muh close ups of my actors faces as they speak incredibly slowly about nothing in particular
>>83817634
Muh grass
Who em I ?>
>>83818261
how can he be so fucking wrong
>>83818289
Iwai?
>>83818289
malick
>>83818289
Shamalamadingdong?
Muh long shots
>>83818300
>Liv Ullman cries about existentialism or family drama. Sometimes there's ghosts
That's every Bergman film
>>83818329
>>83818596
Good guesses but wrong
>>83818416
>>83818483
You two are just fucking stupid
>>83818666
tarkovsky
>>83818731
Far better sequence you could have used.
>>83818731
DING DING DING DING
Finally someone ITT who is not a complete uncultured swine
>>83818777
>>83818666
First off, wew lad.
Second off, grass is not even the first thing you think of for Tarkovsky.
>>83818640 this guy had a better idea, but I'd just say his use of elements in general is very trademark to him. Moreso thank Kurasawa, even, especially his use of water.
>>83818859
long shots were used by almost every director in 60's, 70' i wouldnt say its a tarkovsky thing
>>83818926
>60's and 70's
try 10's and 20's, pleb
>>83818989
i don't watch amateur cinema
>>83818926
I didn't say it was a uniquely Tarkovsky thing. I said it's more a Tarkovsky thing than grass is. My point is is that he had a firm emphaisis on all nature, and his best use of it was water.
>muh niggers
>>83817634
HANDS OFF BRESSON HE IS THE GREATEST KINOMAKER ALIVE!
>>83819638
he died the year you were born
>>83819031
fucking pleb, watch more films
>>83819735
literally fuck off
bet you even didnt watch any of his movies
>>83819990
tarkovsky or bresson? i've seen all of their films and like them a lot desu
>>83820046
bresson. oyeah, then whats you favourite?
>muh filming in harsh conditions
>>83820201
he's livinig tough life
(for you)
>>83820106
lancelot du lac or 4 nights of a dreamer
i dont dislike any of his films
>>83820201
>muh klaus kinski
>>83820288
muh
my absolutely fav is au hasard balthazar. don't see the point of moviemaking after that
>>83820201
>muh can't make a decent movie without kinski
>>83820422
delet this and watch even dwarfs started small
>>83820472
Search your feelings, anon. You know it to be true.
Herzog without Kinski is just distilled boredom.
>>83820413
really like that one too as well
a lot of people dislike the devil, probably but i think its because they don't agree with the main character, which imo is a dumb reason not to like it since that's not what the film is about
>>83820611
so what about enigma of kaspar hauser, even dwarfs started small, stroszek, heart of glass, his documentaries?
you're just pleb being pleb
personally i was more impressed by bruno s acting. and would trade kinski for him,
>muh different time
>>83820915
>so what about enigma of kaspar hauser, even dwarfs started small, stroszek, heart of glass, his documentaries?
>meh chekhov&dostoevsky&tolstoy
>muh close-ups
>muh racism
>muh historical fantasy
this place deserves to die
>muh long takes
>muh models
>>83821497
actually watch his films you mongoloid
>muh low bass rumble
>>83821567
more like pseudo long takes solely for spectacle
>muh helicopters