>want to cut Kreacher out of the Order of the Phoenix movie

>>83804869
what does the mirror do again?

>>83804869
>tfw they cut Peeves

File: lon_putin_170517.nbcnews-ux-1080-600.jpg (45KB, 1067x600px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1067x600px

>current year
>decade old childrens flicks

>>83804888
this

Wow, it's almost as if Rowling had no fucking clue where her drivel was headed

That would certainly explain her going maximum MacGuffin at the end. Dull fucking franchise.

>6 posts
>no dullest franchise copypasta
Shameful display

>>83804869
>Why did Rowling allow this?
She didn't became britain's most rich woman because she was protective of ther ip, fám

>>83804975
>>83804888
nvm I just looked it up, it's how Aberforth finds out Harry is in trouble when he and Hermione get captured in book 7

>>83804979
How dull though?

i don't watch kids movies

>>83804888
It's a two-way mirror that shows whatever the other part of the mirror is seeing. It seems to work like the portals in Portal only you can't pass through it.

For example, the mirror is hanging up in tne girl's bathroom while you have a shard of it in your bedroom. When you look into it you see the girl's bathroom whereas when they look through it they see your bedroom. Something like that anyway, the movies ir is in don't bother to explain it.

>>83804869
Couldn't reveal all her weird Dumbledore soap opera shit before the book was released. It was too secret

>>83805007
dead meme

File: 1489592588835.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

Why are you even trying to find logic in a childrens series bassd off of one the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83805044
based dullposter

File: 1483742982467.png (407KB, 1080x1426px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1080x1426px

>>83804921
The tumblrinas got bored of spamming 13 reasons why threads
Also reminder we won :^)