ITT: We post actually good remasters of movies. I'll start.

>>83747388
bump

File: 123841934.png (152KB, 505x259px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 505x259px

I don't know why they made this look worse than before

dvdexotica.com/2016/09/controversial-blus-american-werewolf-in.html

The LotR bluray has a blue tint on it

Is there a list of blurays that looks like shit because they made some dumb change?

Being the good goy I am I want to buy some movies and feel worried I will get some fucked up version on the bluray

>>83747388
wait what. Ultimate Hunter edition is garbage

>>83749581
>Why yes of course I prefer fuzzy garbage to a sharp high quality crisp image! Shit tastes delicious!

>>83749581
Yup. OP made this thread for "le ebin troll XD" and should go back to whatever shithole he came from. The UHE is one of the most egregious examples of overdoing it that I can think of. Everything looks like it's made of wax. All grain is erased. Truly horrible, and only someone who does not enjoy film can say it's an upgrade with a straight face.

>>83748888
The older Blueray was over-sharpened/too much added grain making it a mess during some scenes. Your pic is the only bad thing about the newest release

>>83750219
They restored it in 6k and still made it look shit.

File: panasonic-150-inch-plasma-tv.jpg (23KB, 500x311px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x311px

CRT and Plasma > LCD xLED 4/5/6/7/8K shit
>But muh inches, curves and resolutions
Fuck off. Most of the time, I'd rather be watching a Laserdisc than a Blu-Ray.

Best version of Die Hard?