>>83719981
no. no more remakes pls.
>>83719981
Remake of an already remade movie kino.
>>83719981
>make one successful,get handed a classic
Really shows how desperate hollywood is.
>>83719981
Yup. Man knows atmosphere. Nosferatu was pure atmosphere
>>83719981
/v/edditors will love it just because it has colors and is new
>>83720069
He didn't want to do it right next but something happened he said. Idk this is good article/podcast on it all though. https://www.google.com/amp/collider.com/nosferatu-remake-robert-eggers/amp/
>itt: plebs complaining about a remake of a film that was just an adaptation of Dracula with a different name because they couldn't get the rights from Bram Stoker's widow
Although really, just call it "Vampyr" or something and no one would know it was a remake.
pls cast ayynya
>>83719981
Normally I'm against more remakes but this unironically sounds good.
>>83720907
yeah that's true, but there's also vampyr from 1932
>>83720907
Yeah no one has seen the OG one cause muh silent movie is hard to watch. It'll be cool to see how he'll depict the time period it takes place like he did for the VVitch. It'll be a lot harder I imagine cause he can't just do the woods and house. Mf gonna have to spend a shit ton of money like he did for VVitch just for the historical aesthetic alone.
>>83719981
>VVitch
THIS HAS TO STOP! ENOUGH
There's a remake starring Doug Jones coming out this year
>>83719981
Sure, why not. I thought the witch was good.