Will it win an Academy Award? Which one?

Award for worst piece ah garbage eva!

>>83644869
Your moms son already claimed that one

>>83644901
Ayy

>>83644836
Probably one of the awards that no one cares about like Sound Mixing or Costumes.

>>83645447
Still an award

>>83645981
An irrelevant one in the scope of the whole thing.

>>83644836
Best waifu

>>83644836
Is she jerking them off?

>>83644836
Do DCucks attach weight to RT scores now? Someone please clarify.

>>83644836
You know WW got that 93% because she is "muh stronk wymyn"? Realistically, it should have somewhere between that 80% and 77% of Thor and Cap

>>83644836
nobody will remember it in two weeks

File: silly goy.webm (953KB, 800x646px) Image search: [Google]

953KB, 800x646px

>>83644836
>It's not often that I wake up to a mailbox full of unsolicited comments from Academy members about a movie, especially in June, a half-year before any of them receive their Oscar nomination ballots. But that's precisely what happened on Sunday, the morning after Patty Jenkins' Wonder Woman screened for the organization's members at its Beverly Hills headquarters. The pic — the first big-studio superhero film in either the current DC or Marvel movie universes centering on a female character, starring Gal Gadot — opened nationwide on Friday, garnering 93% favorable reviews and grossing $100.5 million at the domestic box office.

>"I've never seen more people at an Academy screening," tweeted Tony Pierce, a community manager at the Academy, along with a picture of the crowd. "

>""Large, enthusiastic crowd," wrote one male member of the public relations branch who is not connected to Warner Bros., the film's distributor, or the film itself. "Big applause for Patty Jenkins and Gal Gadot.

>"It played extremely well. If a film like this can get Oscar attention, this might be the one this year." He continued, "My guess is that the directors might want to nominate Patty Jenkins for reasons you can divine, though not undeserved. Remember, the pic got great reviews. On the other hand, WB couldn't get any Oscar action for very well received Harry Potter and Batman films [apart from a posthumous Oscar for Heath Ledger]. Oh, and on a personal note, if the film stopped the moment Gal Gadot made her stunning entrance, I'd give it five stars and go home happy — she's incredibly beautiful and, more importantly, quite a good actress, at least for this role. The film is really wonderful. Gotta hand it to Patty Jenkins."

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/oscars-could-wonder-woman-be-popcorn-movie-finally-breaks-best-picture-contention-analysis-1010042

>>83644836
Could you put the laughing Gal behind sad Ben Affleck?

File: 636060601386955657-2069599132_RT Article 5.png (176KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1440x900px

>>83646470
lmao shut the fuck up, dumb faggot

File: asdfsdfsdf.png (206KB, 762x479px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 762x479px

>>83646717
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVY2KwagyGE&t=1s

File: laugh.png (750KB, 877x514px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 877x514px

>>83644836

/tv/ will meme this into getting an Oscar nom and then REEEEEE about it.

They're legit talking about it at the Academy, be careful.

File: laughing gadot.png (339KB, 471x445px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 471x445px

>>83646259
>couldn't even win a insignificant nomination
embarrassing

>>83646886
>93%audience score
Retard