So was he a fucking replicant or not?

>>83629177
If he was, then it doesn't matter and the movie has sense.
If he wasn't, then it doesn't matter and the movie still has sense.

>>83629177
He absolutely was, in every cut besides theatrical.
So yes.

>>83629177
In best versions, no. So we'll say no. Also no in the source material.

>>83629177
He is a replicant implanted with Gaff's memories (up to a point Gaff met rachel same way Deckard did and whatever gave him the limp happened to him)

That's how Gaff knows what Deckard is thinking and why he treats him with absolute contempt

>>83629177
> ITS AN UNICORN DECKARD JUST LIKE IN YOUR DREAM I KNOW ABOUT YOUR DREAM SO YOURE A REPLICANT DECKARD HOW DENSE CAN YOU BE JESUS CHRIST LMAO

This cryptic line delivered by Gaff is said to shed some light on the issue, but nobody is sure

>>83629177
Well, he's in Bladerunner 2049. In any other case I would say yes he was, but he clearly isnt if he's in the movie unless theres some bullshit twist.

Replicants don't live very long. But then again who does.

>>83629621
>an unicorn
come on pajeet.

>>83629829
They were specifically engineered to live short lives. It's not implausible they could remove the age limit for some special units.

>>83629177
No not originally. Scott only claimed he was a replicant after fans came up with the theory in order to make himself seem more deep.

>>83629621
what about Deckard talking while sleeping?

>>83629177
well he aint called a replican

>>83630118
But do they get old/age? Like getting saggy and gray hair as Han Solo?

File: 1493332934697.jpg (285KB, 962x1376px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 962x1376px

>>83630263
They are bio-engineered, not fucking robots from Fallout 4,

>>83629177
To me, definitely yes. He was an experimental Nexus-6 meant to replace Gaff as a blade runner but the experiment was a failure in the end.

>>83629177
#Deckisnorep

>>83629177
I honestly don't know. you know why? cause its the slowest movie ever! I have tried to make it through it 3 times cause everyone raves about it..

>>83629177
He got shit done so he was a replican

>>83629177
Unfortunately yes. Mainly because Rid Lee thought it would be like, hella amazeballs and so deep for him to ruin the heart of the original story

>>83629177
Yes he was.

I don't know what this means for the new movie where he is old though