So why didn't they just fly higher?

>>83571076
That wouldn't be aesthetic

>>83571076
Because reasons

>>83571115
I guess it's better to keep flying within that monster's reach and be killed than to be accused of being unaesthetic.

>>83571242
It was the 'Nam Era. You couldn't operate if you didn't look cool doing it.

File: IMG_4946.jpg (327KB, 1296x730px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1296x730px

Why the fuck did they have to make King Kong stand on his two feet and walk so awkwardly throughout the entire film?? Just another reason why the 2005 version with Jack Black is a million times better.

>>83571510
Because this wasn't a reimagining of Merian C. Cooper's King Kong, this was a reimagining of Toho's King Kong.

>>83571510
Nice bait.

>>83571510
the 2005 Kong is unironically Kino

>>83571510

Is there a shortened cut? There is too much filler in 2005 King Kong.

>>83571076
Air pressure can throw a helicopter flying out of control.

>>83571076
Because the monkey has big arms and could still probably reach them if they flew higher

>>83571076
https://youtu.be/uNx4RbeSpYM

cuz jordan vogt robets is a nigger

>>83571076
They're already next to the sun if they went any higher they would be in space

>>83571076
No clue, it's fucking retarded. 19,000 feet is the upper service ceiling of the UH-1, depending on model, load, conditions, etc.

>>83571076
kong would just throw trees at them anyway, with his super natural accuracy

>>83571076
They just didn't fly so good.

File: 91BvDZn8G0L._SY445_.jpg (43KB, 309x445px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 309x445px

>>83572465
Nah man, but they actually released an extended edition. It's like they weren't impressed that we took the whole dick so they shoved the balls in there too.