>This was acceptable CGI in 2008
Daily reminder
>2008
Jesus christ.
Someone kill me.
>>83565657
Not really, everybody said it was bad but the movie was good so nobody cared.
>>83565657
>2008
Two-Face wasn't in the Burton movies, idiot.
>>83565703
It's weird how an perfectionist like Nolan let it slip tough
>>83565792
black twoface was
>>83565657
All of Nolans Batman movies are overrated
>>83565657
It was good in motion tbf
>>83565674
>videogames regularly surpass this now
>>83565657
>hurr durr Nolan made gritty realistic Batman
>man walking around with half his face gone like it was nothing
>>83565674
What "le fuggy" is this even from?
>>83565657
Because cgi looks less scary than make up.
>>83566555
FF the spirit within
>>83565657
This was the original Two-Face outfit for TDK (practical make-up) but somehow Nolan decided to use the cheesy CGI instead
>>83565792
he was, and he was black
>>83567080
>>83566797
>>83567080
>>83566797
that looks terrible, his face is too clean
>>83567106
this looks good
>>83567139
it's the same thing from different angles you retard
>>83567166
i mean they did a good job on the head, but a terrible job on the face.
the face should had looked like that one
>>83566797
>>83567106
PIZZA NICE AND BURNT
>>83566184
>>83566555
Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within. I remember when this first came out, a lot of were weirded out by how real we thought it looked. Like, who needs real actors now that we have cgi, right?
>>83565657
Why are the colours so bright?
>>83565657
Why does the other side of his face seem so unaffected. Wouldn't there be at least a little bit of swelling after something like that? At least a little swelling on the border between xtra crispy and normal side of his face?
>>83565657
Anyone else get hungry whenever you see his face?
>>83567166
and it's completely different from both angles you retard
>>83567602
I remember watching this movie and being sorely disappointed that it was nothing like the games.
>>83565657
Thaw wasn't even the original. They had a more realistic burned effect that they scraped because they thought it was too scary.
>>83565657
i was surprised they got away with that for a pg-13 superhero flick you get to see his mandibles and ligaments that's pretty gnarly.
>>83565657
I remember it being pretty good until I watched it again on Bluray. It's pretty laughable
>>83566797
>name is TWO FACE
>burn the back of his head instead of his fucking face
what the fug
>>83565657
Wasn't it much more realistic initially, but they decided to "tone it down" just so it wouldn't be too off-putting and disgusting?
Imagine if 2face was practical and instead Nolan used CGI to make Tom Hardy a big guy.
>>83565657
why are people complaining about this shit? This is exactly what Two-Face would look like
>>83565674
FULLY
>>83570194
Dwight's make up is terrible. You can't tell he's got his face burned half the time
>>83566184
All of Nolan's movies are overrated except Memento.
>>83571603
>never answer the phone
>>83565657
I thought this CGI was/is great and am surprised they pulled it off so well. Am I mentally challenged or something? It looks quite good to me honestly
>>83571307
Looks fine to me. And considering Nicotero won an Oscar for make up a few months ago I trust his vision of what an iron burn would look like over yours. Go jack off to Nolan's cartoon eyeball.
>>83572599
same, it looks great
>>83566797
>>83567080
>>83567106
Now I'm just sad that this didn't make it in the final film. Can you imagine how great it would be to have just a realistically burned Two-Face? Sure, some fans would complain but it'd be amazing.
>able to speak words with clarity and eloquence.
>missing half of his lips.
BRAV-FUCKING-O NOLAN
>>83568539
I remember watching this movie and being sorely disappointed that it sucked.
>>83573416
would you really like it if Dent snarled and have his spit drool out of his mouth and subtitles were put on the screen instead you fucking retard?
>>83566079
>Nolan
>perfectionist
>>83573671
Yes.
>>83573671
Actually, yes. That would be in par with the realism Nolan wanted.
>>83567080
I believe they chose to go with CGI Two-Face because the final practical makeup effect made it seem like he had more to his face instead of less, and Nolan really wanted to show his fucked up visage. However, I would really like to see the original CGI before they toned it down to be more acceptable, I believe it would illustrate Harvey's torn psyche even more
>>83566274
They really don't.
>>83570464
underrated
>>83567602
Still images from Spirit Within look good. When they start moving, however...
>>83573671
Yes. Nothing wrong with looking pitiful and disgusting while being a vengeful cunt.
>>83568539
Same. It had some random themes that show up in the games but none of the sword and sorcery stuff. It felt more akin to the Matrix or something.
>>83578027
Oh defnitely. I was in 8th grade and everybody was going crazy about how this picture was so hot and realistic. Lol.
>>83575232
Look up one of the far cry 5 trailers.
>>83578369
I jacked off to that. In fact, I think I will again...
What happened to Aaron Eckhart? He was in a ton of stuff for a while but I hardly hear about him now. Thank You For Smoking was top tier.
>>83580628
He died.
>>83565657
They didn't want it to look realistic. They wanted it to be watchable. They wanted to get the point across without being hard to watch. They said they were aiming for Pirates of the Caribbean skeletons level realism
>>83572599
>>83572706
i think a lot of people want a real horrifically burned person instead of cgi
>>83565657
>>83565674
Looks real to me
>>83565657
Killer Croc should have been CGI in Suicide Squad - Bane should have just been a bigger actor
Make up always looks better than CGI on a real person
>>83565674
This still look pretty amazing
>>83566165
>>83567102
Harvey Dent was black, 2face was white
>>83566274
not in polygon count.
>>83580150
>trailers
Yeah, not in-game but in-engine
>>83565674
What Rebels episode is this?
Damn, I thought it's something out of behind-the-scenes video, but it's not
>>83565657
>this was acceptable CGI in 1999
wait holy fuck is that really what it looks like CG is a joke haha
>>83572599
No, people are just circlejerking around here. I watched it the other day, I like the way the muscles move, and it matches the other half well.