Is it good?

Why are there so many threads about it today? Also, like in the case of the first one you could just watch the attack scene on youtube.

>>83556298
No. But it's pretty relevant.

Don't be the guy who watches the second movie before the first.

File: A_68b804_6282655.jpg (80KB, 736x736px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 736x736px

>>83556298
Its ok, this is the future of londonistan after all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOKf5r_JMAo

>>83556298
It got a lot of flak when it came out didn't it? The sheep should not bite the wolves.

>>83556478
>Why are there so many threads about it today?
Because London is falling?

I'm sure if the main character was some spandex-wearing überman rather than a guy with a gun /tv/ would never stop talking about it.

yes it's the die hard of our generation

>>83556298
Children of Men if more accurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrALRx95mHs

>>83556298
It was pretty entertaining

>>83556661
I'm just not cheking the news today, now I see. Still the one similar in France was bigger.

File: 1489014961599.png (1012KB, 564x770px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 564x770px

London bridge is falling down, falling down

>>83556827
my fair lady

>>83556298
Watched it last night, breddy good
>not-merkel getting btfo

>>83556827
lmao @ the floating faggot flag

it's directed by an iranian s no!

>>83556827
>that pic

Rhetorical kill-shot if I have ever seen one