[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

4K Blu-rays Cracked

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 78
Thread images: 10

File: 11416610-3594463353014543.jpg (87KB, 465x600px) Image search: [Google]
11416610-3594463353014543.jpg
87KB, 465x600px
Why aren't you watching Patriot's Day in 4k right now, /tv/?
>>
>4k bluray players are too expensive
>don't want to waste 100GB (and the time it would take to download 100GB) of HDD space
>>
>>83500259
>100GB
the remux is 65gb, cuck
>>
because i have no interest in this or smurfs 2.
>>
the muslim wife was so fucking strong
i clapped and yelled FUCK yeah in the theater
>>
MORE LIKE MANLET'S DAY LMAO
>>
>>83500234
Because I'm not a 55 year old thrice divorced man interested in post-9/11 fairytales to make baby boomers feel safe and clap their hands
>>
>4K Blu-rays cracked
source?
>>
>>83500234
Waiting for 32K
>>
>>83500781
This is the second disk to be cracked, the first was Smurtfs 2

https://www.forbes.com/sites/curtissilver/2017/05/05/massive-4k-uhd-blu-ray-torrent-file-appears-online-has-aacs-2-0-been-cracked/#2987810a2b16
>>
>he pirates movies
lmao
>>
>>83500945
>he gives kikes shekels to watch anti-white propaganda and support the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people

Good goy
>>
Why didnt they just go witn the original title Chink Holocaust? Not subtle enough I guess.

>The only good vietnamese is a dead vietnamese. They are like animals. Thye are the enemies of humanity. And thye eat dogs, our friends. They deserve nothing but a bullet vapoirizing their sickly ugly faces.

Chilling..
>>
Can you post screencaps of Rachel Brosnahan and Michelle Monaghan in 4K remux quality png pls?
>>
>>83501095
>>
>>83501487
>2160
>is 1530
>>
One of the coolest gunfights I've seen since Heat at the end of this movie. Fucking epic
>>
File: 1496430419860.jpg (32KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]
1496430419860.jpg
32KB, 720x480px
>>83500234
>HE LIKES HIS MOVIES ON HD
LAUGH AT HIM LADS
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
File: boston-20tank-620x349.jpg (81KB, 620x349px) Image search: [Google]
boston-20tank-620x349.jpg
81KB, 620x349px
Because I saw that shit happen in real life when I was living in Boston. Fuck Marky Mark's revisionist historical Mary Sue fan fiction.
>>
>>83501066
Didn't know Raimi directed this.
>>
Couldn't you just rip it through hdcp which was cracked ages ago?
>>
>>83501911
>unironically being a masshole
LEL
>>
Name one good movie on 4k blu ray

I'll wait
>>
>>83501808
had to crop it you stupid faggot, it's too big otherwise
>>
>>83501875
>on hd
lel fucking street shitter, learn proper english
>>
>>83502031
crouching tiger, hidden dragon
sicario
arrival
unforgiven

let's not forget about

batman v superman dawn of justice ultimate edition
the martian
xXx the return of xander cáge
and the great wall
>>
>>83500234
>one of the first "cracked" movies released is a based on a recent psyop to sell us the idea of Muslim terrorists
Gee, I wonder who could be behind this?
>>
>>83502225


Stunning....
>>
Is 4K actually noticeable compared to 1080p on a television that's 50 inches or less in size?
>>
>>83502031
Goodfellas got a 4k release
>>
>>83502406
it's noticeable on a 27" monitor, tard.
>>
>>83502225
Unforgiven is an upscale.
>>
>>83501983
>2017
>not being a Masshole
You some kinda wicked retahded queeah?
>>
>>83502406
I have a 4k monitor at 32 inch but I sit like a foot from the screen.
>>
>>83502406
less than 50 with a reasonable viewing distance, no. there's a bigger difference the larger the display and the closer you sit.

studios are probably betting on people being fooled by hdr rather than 4k this generation anyway.
>>
>>83500234
already seen it
>>
>>83502452
nope.
>>
>>83502527
>he's not watching it on a 24/7 loop
what are you, some kind of terrorist?
>>
>>83502558
Is too!
>>
>>83500234
Tom Hanks and Marky Mark are the biggest shills in hollywood
>>
File: 1457897365889.jpg (83KB, 685x615px) Image search: [Google]
1457897365889.jpg
83KB, 685x615px
>>83500945
>give us your money you stupid goy what are you poor or something
>>
>>83502577
nah. you picked the wrong title(s!) too (sicario/arrival finished at 2k).
>>
>>83502468
Oh fuck man. I live like 3 houses down from Menino's old house. His wife still lives there. It was super sad when he died, he used to throw the coolest block parties and gave out great candy every halloween.
>>
>>83502640
This.
It's becoming clear that the CIA is behind this whole "cracked" thing. Another way to get the content of their psyops to as large an audience as possible.
>>
>>83500996
>spending hours downloading anti-white propaganda to support the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people
?
>>
4K is a useless meme
>>
>>83502406
The bigger your TV the more noticable it is if you have a compatible set
>>
>>83502759
The director of this movie also made Lone Survivor
Go figure, he's on the payroll
He's their go-to propaganda guy evidently
>>
>>83500367
But why bother?
>>
>>83503048
I think you've got it. Peter Berg also made The Kingdom, another movie designed to sell Westerners the idea that Muslims are terrorists.
>>
>4k

Total waste of money. 8K is on the horizon and it's going to be superior in every possible way.
>>
God that movie was awful, the end credits were lame as fuck. I just got a 4k TV. I'd say 4k gaming is in a better place right now over movies. When is criterion going to release some 4k shit?
>>
>>83500234
where is the torrent at?
>>
>>83503586
https://hdbits.org/
>>
>>83500234
Great, now I can take screencaps of Your Name. when it comes out in 4K.
Even if I already pre-ordered the 4K version.

My PC needs 4K wallpapers, you know.
>>
>>83502706
Did he have Mounds?
>>
Aren't most modern movies finished in 2K? 4K is overkill.

Older movies on film on theatrical "release prints" made from several generations past the master generally had a resolution slightly higher or lower than 720p.

1080p blu-ray is really all you need at the moment.
>>
>>83504474
I always heard that theatrical prints for 35mm film was comparable to digital 8k resolution. To say nothing of 70mm.
>>
>>83500663
"Now 'Abortions Day' would be a movie I can sink my teeth into!"
>>
>>83502044
post offsite and link
>>
>>83504474
I think most big budget movies are shot at 4k or 8k now. Smaller movies probably stick to 1080p or so though.

I think most good releases make the transfer from the master so can make good use of the 4k. I'm sure some are like you said and not possible to work with the master though. Do you have any specific examples of movies where the film master is lost and you're going to get shitty quality from what's available? And I can't imagine that release prints would be that poor quality.

>>83504580
35mm is just a tad lower quality than 4k is what I've heard. With 70mm being able to reach at least 8k, if not higher, with good results.
>>
>>83504580
No digital resolution comes close to even 35mm film.
>>
>>83504633
Maybe it was more than 8k. Whatever I remember hearing it compared to was much much more than even current 4k digital technology.
>>
>>83504754
For sure.
>>
File: ALEXA65_fb_1300.jpg (127KB, 1248x724px) Image search: [Google]
ALEXA65_fb_1300.jpg
127KB, 1248x724px
>>83504633
Feel like shilling this camera because everyone in the industry shills it.

>>83504631
They may be shot at 4k or 8k but the final master may not necessarily be in 4k. CGI takes longer to render the bigger the image gets.
>>
>>83504631
>>83504633
Just looking it up on some photo site found me this comment:

> A "35mm" frame is 36x24mm in size. Look at the resolution spec for some films and lenses. Some films were rated at nearly 200 lines/mm, but some much less. There was a tradeoff between sensitivity and grain size. That added noise and lowered spacial resolution of more sensitive films. Lenses also cover a range. Let's say roughly 50 lines/mm would be "good", and 100 lines/mm astonishingly superb. Of course that's only at the optimum f-stop and camera mounted and held very still.

> You said top equipment, so let's see what 75 lines/mm comes out to as a starting point. A "line" is actually one complete light-dark cycle, so you have to allow for at least 2 pixels per line width. So the 75 lines/mm becomes 150 pixels/mm, which means a full 35mm frame would have 5400 x 3600 pixels = 19.4 Mpix.
(this is a little less than 8k at 7680x4320, but much more than 4k at 3840x2160 )

> However before you run off and declare that the answer, look at all the judgement calls that went into ultimately getting that number, and that film resolution and digital resolution are in some ways a apples to puppy dog comparison. Film not only has some maximum resolution, but also grain. This is effectively noise added to the image. Pixels have some noise on them too, but this noise is random and occurs on the pixel grid pattern.

> Film and lens resolution is a "soft" thing. Neither reproduces frequencies up to the limit perfectly fine, then suddenly mushes everything to the average after that. The contrast falls off with frequency, so the resolution spec is some arbitrary point along that curve. Usually the -3dB point is used. In contrast, what one pixel does is pretty much independent of its neighbors. The resolution is fixed and finite due to the pixel pitch, but that also introduces aliasing which is something completely foreign to the analog film process.
>>
>>83500234
So is this movie any good or is it just propaganda?
>>
>>83505006
It's not even good propaganda.
>>
>not just waiting until we get to 8k Hollywood rips
>>
>>83500259
Oppo 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray player master race, reporting in.
And I also have an LG OLED 4K TV.
>>
>>83503844
King sized bars, if I'm not mistaken. I could be wrong, it was a long time ago...
>>
>>83504581
ur mum made the wrong choice m8 kys
>>
thx yify
>>
This was the most accurate 'based on real events' movie i've ever seen.
>>
>BEING A VICTIM MAKES YOU A HERO

>YOU ARE A HEROIC VICTM

>YOU ARE UNDER ATTACK

>COMPLIANCE IS REWARDED

propaganda kino
>>
>>83508349
That's because both were Hollywood productions.
>>
>>83502406
49" Sony Bravia here.
Only actual 4K content I've watched was some dl'd porn. Bready good, much realer better than a bluray
>>
>>83500234
it's fiction
Thread posts: 78
Thread images: 10


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.