Why is the formula so hard to break?
>>83487266
>hard to break
>No one in their right mind would rank Die Hard series like that
>>83487266
Because the gay cabal that runs pedowood doesn't allow anything else commercial success
>what happened to one Saturday morning?
It got too many kids to start thinking for themselves
We can't have that
1 is proof of concept
2 is refining the idea of 1 without getting bogged down with "origin stories" and fully explores the themes and ideas presented in 1
3 no original ideas or stories left to tell, because most of those were already shown in 1 and 2, so 3 is usually just a rehash of already familiar things.
2>1>3 is normie
1>2>3 is patrician
2>3>1 is turbopleb
>>83487266
Because first movie is to get popular
Second is to milk it of money
Third is the jews
Find a series that fits the formula:
3 > 2 > 1
>>83487266
I can break it with one image
>>83487435
What about:
>3>2>1
>3>1>2
>1>3>2
>>83487473
Dr. No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger
>>83487266
This is only true for Star Wars
Terminator, Alien, Predator, and Indiana Jones disprove this theory.
>>83487522
3>1>2
>>83487522
this is literally 2>1>3
>>83487541
>This is only true for Star Wars
Even then, it's only the original trilogy
The prequels are 3 > 2 > 1.
>>83487557
Wrong
2>3>1
2 with 3's face would be the ideal woman
Don't fuck with the formula
>>83487522
K E L O W N A
E
L
O
W
N
A
>>83487575
What? 2 is the most buttery butterface every born.
>>83487605
2 has a disgusting pig face. 3 is gorgeous.
>>83487473
the dollar trilogy
three colors trilogy
Test
>>83487522
It's 1 > 3 > 2, you fucking streetshitter.
>>83487522
obvious shop
>>83487605
3 is the kind of woman I pray to Odin about.
>>83487522
2>3>1
Any other ranking is hot garbage
Do people really not like the girl in light blue? Skinny with huge tits is my jam. Theyre out of order now.
>>83487731
>>83487769
As long as you rate 2 last, I'm fine with it.
>>83487598
>Two good scenes, 80% filler
No
>>83487522
I honestly couldn't decide id cum on all 3 of their faces.
>>83487522
UNEDITED PHOTO
>>83487795
Rating 2 first confirms your faggotry.
>>83487808
Do you really not realize that she looks like an inbred retard?
>>83487765
What is shopped you dumb nigger
>>83487862
Oh cool you made it blurry
>>83487808
>tfw was friends with gorgeous polish redhead who was skinny as a rail and had huge perky dd s
Whenever we hung out it was like hanging with a celebrity. Even women would check her out.
>>83487862
Where's the difference?
>>83487922
You're retarded if you cant see the differences in between the two photos
>>83487880
see >>83487862. The shopped the two girls to have bigger tits and smaller bikinis
>>83487473
Wolverine "trilogy"
>>83487435
>2>1>3
Star Wars
>1>2>3
Alien
>2>3>1
Hmm...
>>83487266
Doesn't apply to Jaws either
>>83487986
Not really a trilogy though.
Even calling Indiana Jones a trilogy is kind of a stretch, but with the Wolverine films it really doesn't make any kind of sense.
>>83488042
Loose trilogy. They're all three independent movies with Logan as the lead.
>>83488041
Or to jews.
2 > 3 > 1
Captain America
>>83487972
Whatever fag
>>83488072
Trilogy means one continuous story though. Otherwise it's simply a series. Star Wars is several trilogy (3 movies that each tell one overarching story). LotR is. But simply having three films with the same character(s) doesn't make it a trilogy.
>>83487731
Finally a man of taste
>>83488199
WRONG
A trilogy is three individual stories. Three parts of a whole is called a triptych.
>>83488199
Technically, it is one continuous story
>>83487266
1. A risk; usually less budget, rushed to get done.
2. more time and budget, actors know their characters, film shows more polish
3. everyone phones it in
>>83488348
>A trilogy (from Greek τρι- tri-, "three" and -λογία -logia, "discourse") is a set of three works of art that are connected, and that can be seen either as a single work or as three individual works.
So Star Wars 4-6 would be a trilogy, LotR wouldn't, same for the Wolverine films (because they are not connected and can't be seen as a single work).
>>83488435
>same for the Wolverine films (because they are not connected and can't be seen as a single work)
They ARE connected, and they ARE three individual works. Based on your definition, it is a trilogy.
>>83487871
>Do you really not realize that she looks like an inbred retard?
She looks totally normal. I don't know what's wrong with you
>>83488488
>as a single work
You conveniently left that out. Every Wolverine movie stands on it's own. There is no story connection between these three movies.
>>83488495
Tell me one thing anon:
Are you attracted to your sister? Your cousin? Your mother? Are you from the south?
>>83488495
3 has the best body, face and hair colour
1 and 2 have bigger tits, but have worse faces, bodies and 1 isn't blond
2 has the worst face
>>83488717
this
>>83488578
>a single work or as three individual works
Look at the "or". You lack reading comprehension
>>83488999
That means it can be seen as both. The Wolverine movies can't be viewed as a single work.
>>83489048
You can view the Wolverine trilogy each individually as well as back to back and still understand the plot and how they're connected.
>>83487435
WRONG.
1=2=3 is patrician because you're judging the story as a whole.
Fellowship>TTT=RoTK
>>83489390
Twin Towers > Return > Fellowship
>>83489378
>stories have consistent quality
Nah.
Captain America trilogy
>>83489317
But they're not connected. Wolverine: Origins has been retconned before The Wolverine came out, and The Wolverine has been retconned before Logan came out.
>>83487473
Indiana Jones
>>83487473
Alien 3 > Aliens > Alien
lotr is 1 > 3 > 2
>>83487318
You're right
It's2>4>3>1>5
>>83487336
lol
>>83487473
Harry Potter
>>83487266
2 > 1 because 1 is a hell of a lot of work. With 2, you already have code and assets, so it's much easier to improve upon 1.
3 < 1 because by this time, the series was successful enough that the devs are pressured by CEOs (codename for retards in chief) to "appeal to a wider audience". At this time, the series dies.
>>83489519
What a terrible opinion
>>83487731
Came to post this.
>>83487375
pretty much this. i'll add that expectations are often too high for the third movie, especially when the sequel was a huge success.
>>83487711
I'm confused. 2 has an objectively prettier face yet i'm more attracted to 3. Seriously, I don't get it
>>83487473
Star Wars Prequels
>>83491297
Came to this post.