Perfect movies don't exi-

>>83477366
4>5>8>7>3>1>2>6

>>83477366
why was fantastic beasts so shit?

>>83477502
It was good but not HP tier

You don't exist, really. Kek

yes indeed, 10/10 movie, all hp movies are. Shame about literally everything else emma watson has been in, complete dogshit and she can't act

in b4 the dullest copypasta in /tv/ history

>>83477366
is he Jewish irl?

>>83477502
Walked out of the cinema about 20 minutes in.

File: IMG_1635.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

You are right, perfect movies do not exist, especially the movie from which the picture you've shared is from. A part of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83477575

You know, I can imagine other actresses playing as hermione and doing a far better job.

>>83477473
2>1>3>4>5>6>7a>7b

>>83477646
7a/b > 6

File: hpendingshot.jpg (23KB, 750x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 750x300px

>>83477366
Perfect ending shots don't exi-

>>83477619
I only open these threads to see this

>>83477619
Should've said:
How could a perfect movie exist in one of the dullest etc etc

>>83477683
A profound and often misinterpreted ending shot, in which Radcliffe is seen trying to escape at high velocity, but to no avail, the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series' only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it's certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83477587
half jewish, so yeah he's jewish.

>>83477788
>he didn't post the image

end

your

self

>>83477646
i like you anon, you're good people!

>>83477633
Like?

>>83477903

Hannah Murray, Claire Foy, or Kaya Scodelario to name a few

>>83477619
>Charlotte's Web
>middle tier
Them's fighting words.

>>83477619
Haven't seen you in a while, good to know you're still going.

2=1>3>5>4>7.1>>>>>>6>>>>>>>7.2

>>83477683
what kind of ending shot is that?

>>83477619
You only have to write the first line yourself and you managed to make a terrible job of it. In fact, what you wrote is on par with one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: emma-watson-short-hair-01.jpg (311KB, 1222x872px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1222x872px

>>83477575
She's single handedly responsible for the ever decreasing female beauty standard.

>>83477366
>Lupin and Sirius know how the map works
>nobody asks why
Perfect my ass.

>>83477366
3 is by far the best, with 7 being a distant second. All the other movies are utter shit and your opinions are trash if you disagree

Harry Potter is gay

>>83477646
this guy get's it. first two movies the best

>>83483191
7 is fucking trash, everyone acting and speaking awkwardly.

File: reeee.jpg (19KB, 400x288px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x288px

>>83477683
>he posted it

File: 1495565712332.jpg (11KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 540x540px

>harry potter

>>83477502
It removes the best part of the series. The comfy setting.

>>83477683
>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh-haHAAAAAAAAAAAAA-