Please explain why this film was dismissed by critics?
It is style over substance like most of his films, but it does it so well how could this be panned and Drive be praised?
because refn sold out and cut the 18 minute child rape scene
>>83424292
Because it's trite af with only some redeeming qualities. The only people who like it are pretentious edgelord loners who identify with Gosling's character.
It wasnt Drive 2. Most people only knew Refn from Drive, expected Goose to be the real human bean and hero again in a straight ahead narrative, instead of his usual violent, stylization and different narrative choices, like telling this film though the eyes of the ineffectual younger brother of a dead dirtbag, against the actual hero of the film, Chang
>>83424292
TAKE IT OFF
>>83424379
b-but senpai
>>83424292
Drive was subtle about it, OGF forced it down your throat with every single frame. In other words, normies couldn't understand it as easy as Drive.
>>83424379
>Throws 'trite' around where it doesnt actually apply
>Calls others pretentious
>>83424292
I don't get why this got bad reviews and something like Upstream Color was praised.
I loved it.
It will be remembered as his greatest film.
>>83424292
OGF is the reddit of movies
Because it's lipstick on a pig; neon masturbation by Refn.
>>83424379
My roommates and girlfriend all like it
>>83424292
it was even worse than neon demon
>>83424292
Because critics saw Drive but never saw Valhalla Rising. Critics being surprised by the film moving slowly and being heavy on symbolic imagery piss me off
>>83424379
pseud
>>83424292
Because Drive is simple, this is not. Critics, especially American critics like simple, especially simple and tragic, a good story with snappy and memorable dialogue is what is preferred.
This is more akin to Refn's earlier films, a very formal, mute and abstract experience.
>its beatdown time
>>83424292
this is refn's best film.
>>83424292
I haven't seen the film but that poster is a travesty of graphic design holy shit.
I've seen it twice. No idea what the fuck is going on.
My friend is an artist and submitted a piece to an art magazine and it got published with a bunch of critics trying to figure out what it means and shit. We were sitting around laughing to the point of tears what some of the people wrote about it, how hard the analyzed it when in reality he just painted something totally random with no thought out into it what so ever.
I feel this film is like that.
>>83425059
Isn't that the point? The neon pink and blue tacky colors is called vapor wave.
>>83424292
>Put up your dukes mister, I'm gonna wreck you
>>83425059
pleb
Better than Drive anyway, although even the Neon Demon was better than that. How you can't "get" this film is beyond me, with so much written about it online, you don't even need to listen to critics to get an accurate description of whats happening.
>>83424292
It's good but it's pretty boring and not exactly a crowd pleaser
>>83425428
What WAS happening though? A little rundown?
>>83424292
I personally had only two problems with the movie like how Gosling would almost never talk, and the scene where Gosling sticks his hand into his dead mother, and some of the symbolism is a bit forced and obvious. But other than that the movie is really good. A movie can have flaws and have me still really enjoy it.
>>83424613
Jesus, I wonder how horrible must it be living with you faggot hipster types.
>>83425122
Just look at Refns retarded cuckface, its obvious nothing deep or meaningful can come out of his head.
>>83424292
>style over substance
you're a pleb and should stop watching films immediately
>>83424292
some shit just didnt make any sense which isnt surprising when you find out that the mother was killed literally because Gosling came to the shooting one day and said "I want my character to kill her" and Refn just kind of went with it
>>83427656
heh. I bet gosslings character really spoke to you right?
Back to your bane threads pls
Because it wasn't good
The Neon Demon was a better example of Style over Substance
>>83424388
>including the "volume:200%"
its just a crap film
embarrassing display by the hipsters pretending they liked it so they can feel like intelligent contrarians who are 'special' for 'getting it'
sad!