Well? Give it the /tv/ treatment already.
>>83387558
It's a good movie with great acting, cinematography and a huge budget that gets shit on because there's a bit of sex in it.
>>83387778
Also some shit is just silly like the giant lawnmower execution
It was so disgusting and degenerate that I couldn't get halfway through.
>>83387558
Tinto Brass is underrated
>>83387833
iktf i always cum at the lawnmower scene and then just stop watching
>>83387558
I Claudius exists and is close enough
>>83387833
>hating RAUNCHY kino
Good movie, shows the best recorded blowjob in human history.
>>83387778
Try the X-rated cut. You're welcome.
>>83387987
I was thinking that too
>tfw I have the uncut version but I'm too pussy to try it
how visual is the sex in this? we talk porn levels?
>>83388109
It's officially categorised as porn because of the content.
>>83388109
what do you mean you're too pussy to try it? it's not a horror movie. Are you scared of lewdness?
>>83388109
are you a pure christian qt
>>83388109
It's literally just porn
>>83388019
is that the uncut version?
>>83388271
Should be.
>>83388109
It was produced and marketed by Penthouse magazine in 1979. yes it is very much porn.
>>83388271
>>83388316
Most of the actors were circumcised, though.
>>83388019
>Try the X-rated cut.
I saw it in 1986, son and there simply ain't that much sex in it to justify all the slander the movie received.
"Caligula" was a victim of SJWs before the term existed, all because of who the producer was.
>>83390373
>gratuitous closeups of uncensored penetration, blowjobs, masturbation, anal, insertions,
>simply ain't that much sex in it to justify all the slander the movie received.
Did you even watch it?
The movie itself, with or without all the sex barely holds up, the script is a mess, the pacing is infurriating, the performances are comical, the set design is tacky as hell.
Even as a art film it doesnt push any boundry besides inserting porn scenes into an R rated period piece.
Porn had all ready done that.