Netflix 4K has been cracked; lossless 4K shows are being leaked online

>>83361761
>the same way you can download original YouTube streams with youtube-dl.
You can't. You can only download the shitty encoded versions that YouTube present.

Vimeo sometimes offers the original stream.

Are they releasing 4K masters before Netflix bitrate starves them so they can be streamed off the internet? Or have they just found a way to copy 1-1 the streams Netflix proffers?

>he fell for the 4k meme

my projector can't go any higher than old school 'hd' which is 720p. Maybe I should get an upgrade for this shit.

No way streamed 4K is better than blu-ray physical.

>>83362489
>he fell for the better resolution meme
Yeah and so has everyone else since the invention of the television you blithering idiot

>>83362474
Its a 1-1 copy of the HEVC stream Netflix offers. Nobody said the masters are available. Those are only available to Netflix in IMF and ProRes format and never see the internet.

>>83362499
>projector
Jesus Christ anon why don't you just use at that point

>>83362509
It is when Netflix encodes their 4K stream from the original masters using their in-house standards. Most Blurays are shit.

>>83362540
OP called it 'lossless'
Netflix "4k" is blurry and bitrate starved as shit.

>Netflix original series
Yay, so you can get the good stuff like S1 House of Cards, The Punisher, and the weakest season of Arrested Development.

>>83362606
That's still a lossless download. An original master would fill up a 1TB drive with a season or two.

>>83361761
First of all
>4k
el o el

Second
>implying Netflix has anything work watching in the first place
el o fucking el

>>83362624
If you look at the releases that are being leaked out, they are working on releasing all the most high demand stuff first. Stranger Things S1 is out, for example.

>>83362606
The rips are lossless in relation to the streams you would normally get.

>>83362657
it's not in a lossless 4k hevc format
it's in a 4k hevc format that is ripped without a (further) reduction in quality from reencoding
i could take a video of myself shitting, bitrate starve it and say "here, i am giving you this video and you are going to get without any quality loss, it will be a lossless video" but in the end of the day it's still shitty quality shit

>lossless
the bitrate is still shit though. it's not like they have blu ray tier quality on the servers and they're just encoded to look like shit

>>83362722
where can i find it all
where are they being uploaded

>>83362734
You are autistic

what about amazon? there are fucking incredible amounts of 4k streaming options for shows on amazon, including lawrence of fucking arabia and on the waterfront which aren't available on 4k blu ray yet

>>83362606
Are you autistic? Lossless doesn't mean that they magically got access to the original master file in Apple ProRes or IMF format. Lossless means they cracked the Wildevine DRM and can slurp up the raw files that Netflix hosts on their servers.

>>83362742
Secret club

nice! i'll wait for yify though

Netflix 4K is fucking worse than 1080p Blu-Ray

If you want actual 4K 10bit HDR, get 4K Blu-Ray discs

>>83362759
He's right though. Calling it lossless is misleading

>>83362722
>Stranger Things

Such pretentious garbage that show was

>>83362734
You need your autism meds, boy. If I download the original video from your iPhone or whatever, that is a lossless rip of you shitting.

>>83362804
>pretentious
it was nostalgia pandering to the LCD. It's far from pretentious, holy shit

If you don't have a Netflix subscription at this point, you are a loser.

>>83362781
>Lossless doesn't mean lossless, it means lossy!

>>83362783
so like private trackers?

>>83362830
it's not though you stupid retard. your phone encodes videos to save space you fucking idiot. You'd need to save in a raw or lossless format in order for that to be true. The only accurate thing to say is "higher quality." it's not lossless, just "less lossy"

>>83362837
+5 cents

>>83362830
That's not what's happening here though.

>>83362837
Never had one and never will

>>83362742
Private trackers. They aren't on public trackers yet, but they will be. What content do you want to download? I will tell you if they uploaded it already.

>>83362804
Do you know what pretentious means?

>>83362801
Lossless is not misleading. If you rip from a source without a loss in quality, that is a lossless rip. You have to be autistic to say its not losslessly ripped just because its not the original master produced by the shows editor.

>>83362861
That is what is happening here. The source is the Netflix server farm. The rips are being downloaded without any loss in quality. Untouched. That is a lossless rip. You are being autistic.

>>83362926
no, it's still lossy

imagine if spotify was cracked and you could download the mp3s of all of their songs without them being reencoded to further quality loss. You still couldn't call them lossy because they're encoded with a lossy encoder in the first place

the netflix rips are not lossless, they are just higher quality and less lossy

>>83362977
but the source isn't lossless in the first place. there's another term for this kind of thing called "remux"

>>83362875
>What content do you want to download?
idk i havent given that much thought
whats already been ripped?

>>83362988
The ripping process is lossless you idiot.

As long as you rip the original file from the source, it is a lossless rip.

>>83363010
but the vide files aren't lossless. they're encoded in a lossy format. this is similar to a blu ray remux.

>>83362854
It doesn't matter if the phone encodes to h264. By downloading the original file from your phone, I have performed a lossless rip from your phone. The only issue is whether or not something was taken from the source without a loss in quality. The source is your phone's memory just like the source in this case is a Netflix server.

>>83363010
We're talking about compression here though. The files are not using lossless compression

>>83363064
>you can use the term lossless to refer to the transferring of lossy data
"no"

>>83363078
It doesn't matter if the files are lossy. As long as the file being downloaded is the same, the file was ripped losslessly.

Do you think FLAC isn't a lossless rip because the CD is lossy?

>>83363024
Remux refers to putting a stream into another format like from the original disc format to mkv. It is a lossless rip even if the BD is lossy.

>>83363185
>>83363160
but cds are actually lossless though
see>>83363084

>>83363010
>>83363064
>>83362977
You're all using the phrase lossless wrong. Lossless refers to encoding techniques, not the act of ripping a file.
>>83363160
CDs are lossless and so is FLAC. But of course you would have a lossy file if you rip it to FLAC from a lossy format.

>>83362537
You literally need 120"+ or sit right in front of the screen to notice a difference

>all these plebs arguing quality even though most of them are redditors with iMacs and razor laptops
lmao

>>83363010
>it is a lossless rip.

Of lossy data. Sure, it's technically a lossless rip, but the only difference that makes is that there's no further degradation of already degraded data. To make a big deal out of a lossless rip of a lossy encode is disingenuous or stupid. The whole point of a lossless rip is to have peak quality because you have 100% of the original data. Having 100% of the original data of a file that represents less than 100% of the original data of some raw file is completely meaningless.

File: 74403a5c8bbe3efccc335e7ca9bf77d0.png (792KB, 1140x898px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 1140x898px

Holy shit, this is real. I guess it is time to buy some HDD's. 140GB for a season is madness.

>it's another autists shitflinging episode

>>83363213
CDs are lossy. The 24 bit master is the original. CDs are a 16 bit down conversion.

>>83363288
>not the first post from this IP
you used the word wrong. why should you be allowed to? why is it OK for you to do?

File: a62.png (328KB, 800x778px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 800x778px

>>83363267
>everyone is stupid but me

>>83363304
I don't give a shit for your gay debate

>>83363277
The 140 GB is actually not the ones being discussed in these threads. The scene has been encoding Netflix rips to x264 about 3-4 times bigger than the origjnal 4K files.

>>83363366
Checked and keked

>>83363379
Damn, didnt know that, thanks for the clarity.

>>83363277
Wrong. The one you're looking for is the H265 rip. That is only 42GB. The other rips are just bloated rips that weren't ripped from the server but just capped and encoded again.

>>83363324
you sure are lmao.

File: 3351abbd45ce27265fc86017b1e05f37.png (79KB, 939x281px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 939x281px

>>83363277
>>83363482

You guys are right, it looks like the PLAYREADY uploads are significantly less in size. Its insane how much bloat those other "4k" uploads have.

>>83363552
>13 GB for one shitty movie

Autism is a hell of a thing

>>83363277
>>83363552
>ywn get BTN access for 4k rips

>>83363267
Nigger the 5K iMac is the most high resolution color accurate screen you can get

>>83363665
its not loss lmao.

I can't even run 4K, but this is good for 1080p encodes.

>>83363662
Just find a decently reputable tracker with open invites. Get a good ratio and try to stay active in the message boards/irc if you can. Get an invite to an invite only tracker and do the same thing.

Back when I was trying to get one there were users on private trackers that would give you an invite to ptp/whatcd/btn based on your upload ratio, activity and longevity.

Not if that route is still viable but it worked for me about 4 years ago

>>83364470
Only one that's working as a start up point by my understanding is Redacted. Which I'm in, just currently going through the problem of having no one download my uploads. I had the same issue with WCD since I live in Australia so have fucked uploads, but worked around that by exploiting requests with the free Audible trick. That doesn't work anymore, so you gotta do shit the good old fashioned way of paying for a seedbox

>>83362804
How low IQ do you must have to think an ET knockoff with a magical girl is pretentious?

>>83364559
Damn, I guess I would proabably lurk the forums and see if anyone is willing to give up an invite if they are on btn or ptp. Offer them a blowjob or something.

Also one of them are giving invites to any member that donates. Offer them the money for the donation and a good ratio screenshot and you might get lucky.

>>83364822
Yeah WCD dying was a bitch, although I probably didn't get hit as bad as most people. I wish the porn trackers had a better standing, cause that's the one place I've got a good ratio on

File: 156856-39717-yoda.jpg (31KB, 400x516px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x516px

>>83362804
why are you speaking with inverted syntax?

>>83364952
I imagine there isn't much to do in Dagobah other than shitpost on spacechan

>>83361761
is there anything worth a damn in there?

>>83365032
It's Netflix, of course not

File: samurai-gourmet-1500x1000.png (508KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1500x1000px

>>83365032
>He's never watched the comfiest show of all time "Samurai Gourmet" now available in 4k.

>>83365114
I dont really watch movies anymore, I was just curious.

>>83361761
>They are better than Bluray quality.
What is each movie a Terabyte?

>>83365131
I was kidding man lighten up.. but there really isnt much on there to be honest, I ended my subscription about 4 months ago and switched to just using private trackers and PLEX. My ISP is cool as fuck and doesnt question me downloading terabytes of data in the same month.

>>83362489
>>83363258
Hey poorfag did you know a 4K tv increases the quality of all HD video and imagery?
Don't worry you're really showing how much smarter you are by saving the extra $100 and opting for a caveman display instead :^)

>>83363258
i'm sitting in front of one right now thats 43" and i see a huge difference.

get some money poor nigg**

>shit in 4K

>>83363660
>13gb
>big for a movie
>big for a 4k movie
that's right senpie just be cool with your 900mb yify rips and pretend that anybody with higher standards than you is retarded

>>83362734
It's lossless. You don't know what you are talking about and you're not masking this by using more technical language.

A properly-ripped FLAC copy of an album is a lossless copy of that album. If the album was mastered from mp3s, then that is not the fault of the lossless rip, nor does it magically mean it is no longer a lossless rip. GIGO.
I fear you still will not be able to wrap your head around it even with that pretty easy-to-follow example.

>>83365376
My nigga. 49" here.

I don't even enable 4K for my games and most things and I know for a fact it's still a sharper image. The tech is simply better behind the glass 4K resolutions are only part of it.

>>83361761
If only there was anything worth watching on Netflix.

>>83362837
(5 cents have been deposited into your account)

>>83363267
t. autist with superiority complex

>>83365007
Did he have internet access? His cabin was pretty comfy

File: 1480307979690.gif (2MB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x320px

>>83365437
>imagine being this autistic about the quality of shitty movies, especially ones you downloaded for free

HDB is back on the anti-piracy menu.

>>83365895
you have this backwards senpie
>I only watch good movies
>I only watch good movies in good quality
>sometimes I pay for them, most of the time I don't
it's that easy. Imagine being so lazy that, even when both movies are free, you download the shit quality one when it takes no effort to just click on a different link

>>83365846
It was an Outer Rim planet right? Can't imagine he'd have great internet access

File: 1432625777968.png (134KB, 334x393px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 334x393px

>>83366037
>imagine being this triggered over shitty movies

>>83361761
Why would they announce this before grabbing everything they want? Why would they announce it at all, even after grabbing everything they want? I don't know much about this sort of thing – is it because Netflix would know regardless?

exigo
xbtmusic
gardencenterstage
deepbassnine
hydra.zone
baconbits
h4h
togethercheatingher
funsharingcommunity
soitgoes
intheshadows
wigornot
mmmm.hm
fakedoor.store
smoothnesspuma
retrowith.in

>>83366393
delete this

>>83366449
no!

>>83362554
??

>HEVC

looks like /g/ got BTFO

File: 6d8434ef9d47959e1970a464a4ed4da5.png (213KB, 547x829px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 547x829px

>>83361761
wtf i love hdb now

>>83367143
IPT was doing this like a year and a half ago

>>83365895
You're just mad at your slow downloading speed

>>83367143
>dear white pople

>tv
>kino
There has NEVER EVER been such a thing. Fuck off plebeian scum.

>>83363277
>140GB for a 4k season

pathetic, I have 1080p remuxed seasons larger than that

anyone here remember joox and how rad2themax that was?

>>83367511
*tips*

>be oldfag
>720p still looks HD to me

whatever, waste storage space on huge files if you want.

>>83361761
4K IS A HACK, IF YOUR MASTER FORMAT ISNT 4K OR MORE.
ALMOST NO MOVIES ARE SHOT IN 4K (ONLY FEW SCENES).

Netflix's 4k bitrate is shit.
Waste of time and space.

>>83367623
You know I'm right faggot

>>83367627
>implying you need huge files with HEVC

>>83367682
And this is why 4k is the biggest meme ever created : It uses too much output. The HD TV is already compressed AF.

>>83367682
You can't even get higher than 720p if you're using firefox or internet explorer or really any browser that anyone uses, only retarded browsers can get 1080p nevermind 4k

>>83362788
underrated kek

>>83362837
but you HAVE to buy a tv box with correct tv or use a kaby lake processor to use 4k REEEEEEEEEE

all this hd shit is a meme, who gives a fuck, video looks as good as it needs to look already.

>>83361761
I'm still comfy with 1080p, hell I still as far as real media goes still have only a DVD collection that I've kept. Really no rush for me.

>>83368158
This. They've actually done studies about how people recall the material after watching it, and people do not remember scenes from movies in higher definition if they watch a BD over a DVD.

File: 1458678501776.png (299KB, 499x641px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 499x641px

>>83368158
>>83368274
DELETE THIS
I mean don't you want to buy 5 different copies of the same fucking movie all because we change the format whenever we want?

>>83367143
too bad it got patched already

>>83368404
>buy

:^)

>>83364470
I haven't been private since demonoid. :/ I miss demonoid.

>>83366892
He means heroin

What is the difference between HDR and 4K. Chefs Table is in HDR for example. Also for those saying regular 1080i is better than 4K you need to get your eyes checked, or is it my eyes that are bad?

>>83370055
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-dynamic-range_imaging
HDR does not refer to image resolution, but rather a higher spectrum of colors.