Was it immoral for Kubrick to bully Shelley to the point she

>>83339887
Nah, she turned out all right.

File: 453276.jpg (30KB, 500x322px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x322px

>>83339908

nice

File: shelley-duvall-3-2000x1333.jpg (194KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 2000x1333px

>>83339908
No.

>>83339887
No, because she's an actor, and sometimes actors need to be pushed to get a great performance out of them and she was great in that movie.

>>83339959
Like you wouldn't...

>>83339887
yes

>does it matter
no

>>83339887
The director isn't there to make friends, he's there to make kino desu

no, because she was being paid to act in a kubrick movie

if she didnt know what she was getting into, then it's her own fault

Hello, she's Shelley Duvall.

File: kubrick-mc-dowell.jpg (43KB, 500x335px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x335px

>>83340071
>The director isn't there to make friends

>Malcolm McDowell had his feelings hurt when, after having such a close relationship with Stanley Kubrick during production Kubrick was not seem to be interested in continuing their friendship after the film was finished, or even pick up the phone to call him. McDowell later put some of that sentiment being a young actor unfamiliar with the intimacy of the filmmaking process, but admitted that he was very upset by it at the time.

>>83340247
kek

>>83340247
Based Kubrick

>>83340247
I only wish Kubrick could come back to life for a couple of hours so he could tell McDowell to stop.

>>83339959

Some folks'lll never eat a skunk
But then again, some folks'll
Like Shelley, the slack-jawed yokel

>>83340247
The true sign of a hack director is when you actually do make real friends with your actor and typecast them in every single one of your movies afterwards. Tim Burton/Johnny Depp is the prime example of this.

File: 1469392418546.png (202KB, 544x416px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 544x416px

>>83340649