Thoughts on this movie from a cinematic perspective?
No atmosphere
They never explained why the Hab exploded, or even why they were on Mars to begin with.
>>83320338
"Science" is a faggy vague marketing term that means nothing.
Engineering > Science. Fuck Bill Nye and Tyson "science" fags.
>>83320373
i see what you did there
>>83320338
The reason why they had a botanist on a mission to a planet known to have nothing growing on it is what?
>>83320407
>Why the Hab exploded
Something something gas leak then kaboom.
>Why they were on Mars to begin with
Because it's there.
>>83320373
>>83320407
Didn't they include the explanation as a montage or something? At least in the book, they explained there was a microtear in one of the layers during the fabrication process and the constant contraction/expansion cycling of the airlock eventually tore it open.
>>83320486
The crew members all had multiple skillsets & roles, but Watney's botany experience was for soil experiments.
Finding out if and how earth crops could grow to sustain a colony is a pretty big deal and not something we could do off Mars. Even if you get the soil exactly right, you still have different atmospheres, sunlight, and weather conditions.
>>83320373