here's the thing

>>83314788
yes
also whats a good website for tv shows streams?

File: 1475521799662.jpg (173KB, 618x618px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 618x618px

Tell me about Kermode, Why does he wear the suit?

The gender politics are all over the place
*waves hands*

>People unironically think he's a quality critic just because he's on the BBC and in the Guardian
>Can't see why Prometheus was shit
>Praises Boyhood
lol he's more pleb than /tv/

>>83315029
>likes prometheus
>loves the martian
>shits on Alien covenant
I don't even know anymore
he certainly has his biases though

>>83315085
He's just shit tier. The fact that he praises films for having similar politics to himself isn't just bias, it's him being bad at critiquing.

Hell, Mike and Jay are better at this than he is.

Why does he hate Guy Ritchie so much?

Literally the kind of person that would watch cuckporn

Why do redditors love this clown so much? He hardly ever makes a good or interesting point or really makes you question your interpretation of a film.

Is it because he looks weird? He's British? He looks like a nu-male?

Literally who: the reviewer

I only watch his rants, like sex and the city and PotC because sometimes they're funny

Why does Mayo always get to do the interviews?

>>83314788

<spoiler>wha?</spoiler>

>bravura

>cinematic literacy

>>83314788

I unironically watch/listen to all his reviews
He is by far the most knowledgeable movie critic around today. The way he talks about movie like they are pieces of art puts him head and shoulders over the rest.

I often don't share his taste but everything he reviews is at least insightful and not just surface level 'analysis' of the plot/acting/pacing/cinematography/etc

>>83315161
>Mike and Jay are better at this than he is
Fucking kek

Armond White aside, are there movie reviewers who are actually worth reading or listening to?

>>83315085
2/3 he is spot on there, the Martian is pure garbage though

I like the KERMODE UNCUT segment

File: 1496009556567.jpg (190KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1920x1080px

>ITT Capeshitters call movie critics shit tier because they have better taste than their own


Mark Kermode: 50 films every film fan should watch
The Arbor (2010)
Bad Timing (1980)
La Belle et la Bête (1946)
Black Narcissus (1947)
Blithe Spirit (1945)
Bullet Boy (2004)
Capricorn One (1977)
Céline and Julie Go Boating (1974)
Un chien andalou (1928)
The Company of Wolves (1984)
Countess Dracula (1971)
The Day the Earth Caught Fire (1961)
Dead Ringers (1988)
Distant Voices Still Lives (1988)
Dogtooth (2009)
The Draughtsman’s Contract (1982)
The Elephant Man (1980)
Face (1997)
Fear Eats the Soul (1974)
Fitzcarraldo (1981)
Godzilla (1954)
Hadewijch (2009)
Hands of the Ripper (1971)
Highway Patrolman (1991)
Immoral Tales (1974)
Interior. Leather Bar. (2013)
The Ipcress File (1965)
The Lady Vanishes (1938)
The Lodger (1927)
Maîtresse (1976)
A Matter of Life and Death (1946)
Le Mépris (1963)
Mother (2009)
Nosferatu (1979)
Ordet (1955)
Pasolini (2014)
Peeping Tom (1960)
Prick Up Your Ears (1987)
Radio On (1979)
Rashomon (1950)
Red Desert (1964)
Red Road (2006)
The Red Shoes (1948)
Rome Open City (1945)
Symptoms (1974)
That Sinking Feeling (1979)
This Filthy Earth (2001)
Underground (1928)
Unrelated (2007)
La Vallée (Obscured by Clouds) (1972)

Educated yourselves plebeians

>>83315441
Out of all Lynch films he picks The Elephant Man?

File: thething1982-1.jpg (108KB, 2064x994px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 2064x994px

>>83314788
No, here's the thing

A good critic isn’t someone who just has the same exact taste as you, you literal turbobrainlets.
It’s pathetic how you autist have the need to be constantly synchronized in every opinion with your "favorite" critic in order to feel that your opinion is valid.

>>83315523
the rest of lynch's filmography is fucking nonsensical garbage. kys

>>83314788

His Pirates review was pretty good

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkG-GC5RKsU

>>83315754
Ahhh I see the good old underage "it doesn’t make sense to me k-kill yourself" defense mechanism firing up.
Are non linear narratives a bit too much for you anon? Dreams in film form are trash right?
I bet you think Tarkovsky makes "nonsensical garbage" too.

Must be quite sad to be you.

>>83316032
>Are non linear narratives a bit too much for you anon?

bahahah muh mobius strip dude it all makes perfect sense if you ignore all the loose ends and just pretend 3/4 of his films are pointless dreams!

either crawl back to /r/movies or kill yourself you utter pseud

>>83316198
nice buzzwords my dear surface level casual, yeah it's all shit you're right give me my standard hollywood structure with direct symbolism shots with universal singular answers to every frame which I can get with a single google search, that's what film really is about who cares about experiences g-go back to imdb/reddit/facebook please don't question my immaculate utterly generic taste

>>83315441
HOLY FUCK! the mediocrity on display here

>Dogtooth (2009)
>Distant Voices Still Lives (1988)

two of the most overrated films i've ever seen

>>83315161
>He's just shit tier. The fact that he praises films for having similar politics to himself isn't just bias, it's him being bad at critiquing.
>what is film criticism since the 1960's

File: 1446263607948.jpg (30KB, 296x288px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 296x288px

>>83315441
I have seen only 3 of these. feels pleb man

On one of his recent vlogs he compared Prometheus to Zardoz.

>>83318716
The nature of big heads

>i went in wanting to like it i really liked it
>i laughed precisely x times

>>83315754
>>83316198
He loved Inland Empire and Fire Walk With Me. Not sure about the rest of his films.

>>83315506
Mark Chadmode

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDQ3tOxuFr0

>>83320547
top rant

>>83315441
>Ipcress File

Why did a Bond fanboy put a Bond knockoff on his 50 list?

post your rare Kermodes
https://youtu.be/wvbaMfF4rO4?t=17s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TZZOXE64To