What is the best trilogy?

File: 1414452620908.jpg (21KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 499x499px

>inb4 lotr/ star wars pissing contest

>Lord of Rings

>>83282270
LotR
>>83282303
>star wars
>good
One great film, one mediocre film, and one garbage film. If you consider the other 5 movies, it's even sadder.

Opinions this bad should be illegal

>all 3 lotr movies are equal
Fellowship is better than TT and ROTK

>>83282270
dude, none of those movies born as a trilogy.
Not even Lord of the ring that it is a hexalogy or a single book.

File: doors2.jpg (870KB, 1000x2566px) Image search: [Google]

870KB, 1000x2566px

>>83282270
That picture reminds me of a trilogy of doors

>>83282387
Nope

TT > RotK > Fellowshit

>>83282387
>>83282443
Both wrong

>rotk> tt>fotr

>>83282419

This is actually easier than the original monty hall puzzle. Odd are 50/50, doesn't matter which door you pick, unless you want a goat, in which case pick the already open door.

>>83282419
You pick a different door. You learn this in maths when you're like 13 retard

File: bear_bottle_burger_math_puzzle.jpg (14KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x480px

>>83282521
this

Reminds me of the calculus-based variants of pic related, which obscure the brilliance of the simpler puzzle.

>>83282537
How do you know which door is the "different" one when they've been shuffled?

>>83282599
The answer is 15.

File: 1490753487236.png (245KB, 672x446px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 672x446px

>>83282599
17

>>83282270
Die Hard

>>83282624
no its 60 dumbass

File: trouble with the trolley.jpg (835KB, 1000x1716px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 1000x1716px

now this is a tricky one

>Star Wars
Go away desperate Disney shill

>>83282624
Yeah, you got it. But like I said, the clever "trick" of the puzzle is obscured with the version that uses complex calculus, since it ignores the one-pint/two-pint part.

I don't have it saved though.

File: die hard.jpg (13KB, 378x171px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 378x171px

>>83282630
Reminder DH4 is better than 2

>>83282684
>deontologism vs utilitarianism
there is no objective answer unless you solved morality

>>83282684
Depends
Which side has the qt?

>>83282684
Switch the lever and proceed to slowly stab the five people to death for putting me in this fucking situation

>>83282772
Both sides have 1 qt

>>83282684
>do nothing
>lie and pretend you weren't there

Next

>>83282760
Utilitarianism is objectively the right choice here. 5 people more live by pulling the trigger than if you don't.

>>83282486
>>83282443
>>83282387
All wrong, TT is Kino, Fellowship is a comfy introduction and Return is barely watchable garbage.

>>83282788
Let the cart roll then. I don't want to share the qt

>>83282684
Switch the lever to the one-person track, then switch it back to the five-person track so that I have used my agency to kill those five people.

>>83282835
Who cares if 5 people live though?

Survival of "people" is not the highest good.

>>83282599
60

>>83282925
How do you define the value of a person?

>>83282925
The dilemma implies saving a life is moral. Therefore saving 5 lives is more moral than saving 1.

>>83282944
>How do you define the value of a person?
That's the question of morality that utilitarianism doesn't answer.

File: 1435349187572.png (66KB, 409x409px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 409x409px

>>83282944
me>family>qts with large breasts>>>>>>>other people

>>83282969
>The dilemma implies saving a life is moral.
It also implies that pulling the lever is immoral.

>>83282599
How it this not 16? I'm not good at this stuff

>>83282997
No shit that's why it's called a dilemma.

>>83283010
Oh nevermind I was just blind

>>83282879
kek

>>83282835
>Utilitarianism is objectively the right choice here
there is a completly healthy guy in the waiting room at the hospital. there are also 5 people that will die unless they recieve transplants of 5 different organs, they are all compatible with the guy. there is a shortage of donors and no organs will get to the hospital in time to save sick people. is it objectively right choice to kill the healthy guy and save other people with his organs as well? why aren't we doing it then?

>>83282852
The only right answer

>>83283010
x+x+x = 30
x = 10

x + y + y = 20
y + y = 10
y = 5

y + z + z = 9
z + z = 4
z = 2

x + y + z = 10 + 5 + 2
=17

>>83283058
ya blew it.

File: setsuko hara.jpg (23KB, 651x400px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 651x400px

Noriko's trilogy.

>>83283071
prove me wrong (you literally can't)

>>83282599
10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+2+2=9
5+2*10=25
>>83282628
the correct answer is 1, bongs like to argue the order of operation but even in that logic parentheses come first, the equation really looks like (6/2(1+2))

>>83283018
Exactly.... So?

File: 1495982883092.jpg (33KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x480px

>>83283083
double tricked

>>83283083
look closer
two beers != one beer

>>83283058
false.

a pint of beer is z.

y+ 2z + 2z = 9
4z = 4
z = 1

x + y * z
NOT x+y+z

x + y * z = 10+(1*5)
= 15

>>83283038
All things equal, then yes it is the moral thing to do. The reason we don't do it is because we have the instinctive aversion towards killing and sacrificing others. This instinctive aversion is usually right, but not in this case. It's also not rational.

File: shockedpepe.png (175KB, 434x409px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 434x409px

>>83283127
FUCK

>>83282684
Crack open the switch halfway...hoping that the preceding derailment will save them all

>>83283038
>>83283145
You're both wrong. The correct choice would be to let one of the sick people die then give his healthy organs to the other four

>>83282599
How is this even possible to solve? Or does 1 beer glass mean half of the double beer glasses?

>>83283162
>you do not have the ability to operate the lever in a way that would cause the trolley to derail without loss of life
you failed the autism test

>>83283188
Yes. Holy shit are you stupid?

>>83283188
that would be the reasonable assumption, yes

>>83283188
In reality it probably wouldn't work out exactly like that but in this case that's the best you can assume

>>83283058
The last operation is multiplication so
bottle = 10
burger = 5
beer = 2

burger + bottle x beer = 5 + 10 x 2 = 25

>>83283145
why don't you sacrifice yourself to become organ donor then? with your logic everyone that doesnt do it is inherently immoral

What's up with the Fellowship worship and Return hatred that suddenly started on /tv/? Is it just contrarianism? Return is of course fantastic, but so is Return.

>>83283245
beer is 1, in the third line there are two beers in one picture

>>83283307
>Return is of course fantastic, but so is Return.
Truer words have never been spoken

>>83283307
>Return is of course fantastic, but so is Return.
Fellowship is of course fantastic, but so is Return*

>>83283245
No you retard
x + x + x = 30
x = 10

x + y + y = 20
y = 5

y + z + z = 9
z = 2

Final one is
y + (z : 2) * 10
5 + 1 x 10
answer is 15

>>83283257
If everyone would sacrifice themselves, then humanity would go extinct. Which is not utilitarian.

Toy Story

>>83282270
>No 'The Dark Knight' trilogy

DROPPED
R
O
P
P
E
D

>>83282604
Well, the open door with a goat is pretty different from the two closed doors, so why not open the goat and see if there's a car inside?

>>83282270
>Clone Wars better than Revenge of the Sith
>Mad Max 3 better than 1

>>83282270

> Superman 2 better than 1
> Jaws 2 rated lower than 3
> Jurassic Park 3 rated lower than 2

i could kill you

>>83284251
congratulations you scored high on the autism test

>>83284140
it's an old image, I think it was made before TDKR came out

>>83282270
The Pusher trilogy is the only one that's consistently good

>>83282270
My first guess would be Godfather but goddamn, the third movie suck balls even though it had potential. LOTR was decent but the overall plot is too limited and most characters are even flatter than in the books. So Pirates of the Caribbean it is.

>>83283307
Fellowship was the closest to the source material and compact enough to imply something epic without revealing all the weaknesses. Besides Return was so fucking dragged and anticlimactic. If not for all the Boromir stuff, it'd be downright mediocre.

>>83284140
It's too fucking lose.

>>83284564
>Pirates of the Caribbean it is
Literally ONE good character, and ONE good movie. How can you say something like this?

>>83282270
Matrix 2 wasn't that bad desu

>>83284597
I actually forgot about Barbosa, but that's still a measly two good characters

>>83284654
>Matrix 2 wasn't that bad desu
I would say all three were good movies, but the first one was so cool that it blows them out of the water by comparison.

File: TrueTrilogiesRanking.png (26KB, 328x556px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 328x556px

FTFY OP

>>83284597
>Literally ONE good character,
Barbossa, Jack, Becket, Davy Jones. I count 4. Being overly anal "good" is overdoing for the last two but they were perfectly functional and memorable. Doesn't get much better for a kids movie.

>ONE good movie
They are were pretty fun and explored more of the world and more complex themes while sticking to the core premise. What else do you want sequels to do? The set designs and soundtrack alone put them over the majority of trilogies.

>>83284760
It'd should've been self contained since the whole shit breaks down the more you think about it.

>>83284863
>putting Star Wars anywhere near Godfather, LOTR or Batman

>>83284863
>Terminator 2 not the greatest movie of all time

You're shitting me, right?

>>83284937
Of course not when Terminator 1 exists

>>83282270
Back to the Future 3 is the best one

>>83284863

Actually worse than the OPs pick

>>83282270
man the first back to the future and matrix movies are classics.

>>83282749
easily anon, DH4 had better henchmen,better heist and better coopting of emergency services which are all the metrics a good die hard movie should be judged by

>>83285013
make a better one faggot

All I know is Captain America trilogy > NolanBats trilogy.

TDK>CA2>BB>CA1>CA3>TDKR

>>83285087
Here is your somehow deserved (You)

>>83283116
The only person in this thread who passed Algerbra 1

>>83282599

trick question, i drink enough beers to know you cannot multiply them (else i would have done it)

>>83282270
>thunderdome not being blank
shit chart

File: 1449943142933.png (209KB, 947x661px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 947x661px

>>83282419

File: trexcamefrompepe.jpg (27KB, 399x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 399x385px

>Jurassic Park
>same rank as Xmen 1 or Spiderman 1
>worse than any of the star trek or superman movies

File: yikes.jpg (62KB, 500x562px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 500x562px

>>83282643
>>83282926
Seems like someone forgot about PODMAS

>>83282270
Jurassic Park is almost a perfect movie, the first one should be much higher than that.

File: 1492469376932.jpg (39KB, 427x425px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 427x425px

>>83282270
>star wars
>higher than LotR

>>83282521
The odds are not 50/50.

>>83286026

That door is cute

CUTE

>>83285172
Too bad he missed that it's 5+1*10=15

>>83282976
DING DING DING, someone finally got it.

>>83282387
True.