Why did it flop so hard? It's an enjoyable action flick.

Because they took an epic legend and made it chavvy and laddish to appeal to idiots.

lead is a poor man's Channing Tatum

>>83262880
because charlie hunnam is box office poison and no one gives a shit about Arthurian legend anymore.

because it's trumpeting lad-mate culture

Production hell and no one's gives a shit about the king aurther name

>>83262880
2edgy

File: tmp_9107-15ce08a2fb6fd4590f57255c726e24d0783095420.jpg (44KB, 332x500px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 332x500px

anyone that gives a shit about king arthur know which is best

>>83262880
It was good
maybe it's just because it's "another king arthur movie" type thing
I'd imagine it would be the same for a robin hood reboot

It sucked.

File: KingArthur2.jpg (65KB, 888x456px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 888x456px

>>83262880
Looks like absolute shit with 2 edgy 2 cool inaccurate armour and props

Amazing medieval kino.

File: 1411081425_3.png (3MB, 1918x815px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1918x815px

>>83263729
This isn't a Flesh + Blood thread.

good King Arthur movies besides Excalibur?

>>83265140
Ladyhawke

>>83263205
>raised on the streets of medieval nodnol
>chav
All is in order.

File: 1423578537210.jpg (144KB, 626x880px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 626x880px

>>83263526
>inaccurate
>King arthur

>>83265140
sword and the stone, nigga

>>83262880
Because it's not a comic book adaption